4
.40 cal
Guest
you claim we have given false information i provide information with it's sources and i'm ignored... good to know.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/84f0209x/2000000/4158986-eng.htm
stats canada's webside show that my mat WAS off sorry guys. my origional numer of 34 was off
the actual number was 20
from Robert F.I found this anti forum on a website called Urban Toronto. I signed up under the name "rational1" and made a few posts to stir the hornets nest. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
ht tp://urbantoronto.ca/showthread.php?7376-Gun-Control
Take the space out between the t's.
Seems very unlikely that in a city that is generally anti-gun
But one possibility that crosses my mind, is that on some board of gun freaks, that a few people might if they are bored ... because there is probably not much else to do in bumfuck - might decide to start trolling as a group here.
But if that was the case, that would be trolling, and is still a violation of the rules here. One way or another, your breaking the rules. Either it is fiction ... or it is a mass troll.
And that you will not provide a link only proves it. Come on, I dare you.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/84f0209x/2000000/4158986-eng.htm
stats canada's webside show that my mat WAS off sorry guys. my origional numer of 34 was off
the actual number was 20
I believe you are correct for the year 2000, .40 cal. This is what I found:
From Mortality, Summary List of Causes (For the year 2006, Release date: July 19, 2010)
……………………………..................Total deaths……..Male…..Female
Accidental discharge of firearms……….17..…….…...17..……0
Intentional self-harm (suicide) by
discharge of firearms……………………..586.…………567.…..19
Intentional self-harm (suicide) by
other and unspecified means………..2,926.………2,128.….798
Assault (homicide) by discharge of
Firearms……………………………….......166.…………133………33
Discharge of firearms, undetermined
Intent………………………………..............5.…………….5.………..0
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/84f0209x/84f0209x2006000-eng.pdf
Seems very unlikely that in a city that is generally anti-gun, that one could find so many Torontonians who were 18 months after the debate so in favour of people carrying guns. It's really hard to find that many crazy nuts.
But one possibility that crosses my mind, is that on some board of gun freaks, that a few people might if they are bored ... because there is probably not much else to do in bumfuck - might decide to start trolling as a group here.
But if that was the case, that would be trolling, and is still a violation of the rules here. One way or another, your breaking the rules. Either it is fiction ... or it is a mass troll.
And that you will not provide a link only proves it. Come on, I dare you.
thanks i was looking for more current stats but i coudn't find them. i was n't looking that hard though
You've broken every rule in this place. How is that not nuts?
Besides, you seem to think that carryign handguns are good things. Everyone knows that only half-wit white racists think things like that. Why would one want to debate with such a bunch of liars? It only brings one down to your level.
We all know the gun registry won't be going away ... enjoy
Interesting so are all people that disagree with you “crazy nuts”?Seems very unlikely that in a city that is generally anti-gun, that one could find so many Torontonians who were 18 months after the debate so in favour of people carrying guns. It's really hard to find that many crazy nuts.
But one possibility that crosses my mind, is that on some board of gun freaks, that a few people might if they are bored ... because there is probably not much else to do in bumfuck - might decide to start trolling as a group here.
But if that was the case, that would be trolling, and is still a violation of the rules here. One way or another, your breaking the rules. Either it is fiction ... or it is a mass troll.
And that you will not provide a link only proves it. Come on, I dare you.