kEiThZ
Superstar
I've always liked the Merkava.
It's a great tank. Especially for urban warfare. It's supportability that's a problem. In the long run, Ukraine needs to be kitted out with European gear.
I've always liked the Merkava.
We might be there….A failed counteroffensive makes them very vulnerable to a Russian offensive.
So what now? News has been sparse recently regarding Western support for Ukraine. It's been completely overshadowed by the conflict in Israel. Are Ukraine's allies debating strategy on how to best end this before it becomes a frozen stalemate? Ukraine has been screaming for fighter jets almost since the start, supposedly pilots have undergone training and they're supposed to get planes sometime next year, but it seems like months since anything has been mentioned. What about more mine removal equipment? What about more long range missiles, now that the US has finally relented with regards to supplying them. What about the German Taurus missiles? Scholz has been flip flopping hard. I'm assuming that Western military deliveries have continued and they just haven't made the headlines?I think doomed from the start is accurate. They never got what they needed and felt compelled to try anyway, either because of perceived or actual pressure.
I can't imagine planning a major breaching operation without airpower.
Indeed. There are similarities with the the Ardennes Offensive,I can't imagine planning a major breaching operation without airpower.
Ukraine must go through, around or over the minefields and defensive works and get to the gates of Crimea. If they don’t do this by this time next year, they’re kippered. By then the West will have provided F-16s, Abrams tanks, and more advanced kit, and taxpayers and pundits in the West will be wanting to see results.So what now?
What's going on in Venezuela-Guyana is a result of our hesitation on Ukraine. Every dictator is now emboldened. I wonder how long before China makes a play for Taiwan.
I can't help but wonder if in spring 2023, Ukraine would have had more success if they'd thrown everything at taking Melitopol before Russia could lay their minefields, instead of diluting their forces on three different pushes. Yes, Wagner would have taken Bakhmut sooner and then progressed further, but Ukraine would have a strategic victory that cuts off Crimea and all the Russian forces in Kherson Oblast, and from which to launch a counteroffensive in Spring 2024. As it stands now, Ukraine is little further ahead than they were in March 2023, see maps March and Dec below, any difference?I think doomed from the start is accurate. They never got what they needed and felt compelled to try anyway, either because of perceived or actual pressure.
Certainly reinforces the opinion that relying on the US to continue to support allies is unwise. Ask the Kurds, the Afghans and now, maybe, the Ukrainians.This isn't looking good. I can't believe we're openly allowing opponents of democracy to do this:
Republicans to meet allies of Hungary’s Viktor Orbán on ending Ukraine aid
Hungarian appearance at two-day event part of Orbán’s transatlantic attempt to bolster Russia’s warwww.theguardian.com
I don't think that would have made an iota of difference, other than literally burning all of the Western equipment in one spot a few months earlier, given that:I can't help but wonder if in spring 2023, Ukraine would have had more success if they'd thrown everything at taking Melitopol before Russia could lay their minefields
I think the West moved about as fast as it was likely possible to - look how fast Ukraine received the MANPATS, MANPADS, drones and small arms that crushed Russia's assault on Kyiv.What would have worked is if our western governments did not wait an entire year since the war began....