Allandale25
Senior Member
Wasn't the frequency going to be 90 seconds at peak? Can anyone elaborate? [Updated. See below.]
Last edited:
It should be possible, and might be advisable, to extend the OL to Sheppard and then convert the existing Sheppard stub to the OL line's technology:
- Will make extending the Sheppard line further east and west more affordable.
- The extensions would be fully grade-separated, and afford same speed as the subway. The converted line will have less capacity, but that lesser capacity may be sufficient for Sheppard for a very long time.
- Conversion from TTC subway to the high-floor OL rolling stock should be a lot cheaper than conversion to low-floor LRT.
The frequency cited was always trains per hour per direction so it would actually be every 5 mins in the worst case. In any case, a definite downgrade. The value engineering has begun!
Surely there is a more cost effective solution (a yard on the Yonge end of the line) than spending a few billion tunneling Sheppard W.There is a need to be able to bring trains from Wilson Yard to the east side of the line in a more timely way.
This would make it easier to start service earlier/run it later as well; right now a lot of time gets soaked up by run time from Finch (soon to be #7) all the way back to Wilson.
Surely there is a more cost effective solution (a yard on the Yonge end of the line) than spending a few billion tunneling Sheppard W.
How is it cheapening out if service levels won't need that at the beginning of completion. Makes perfect sense to me and there are provisions to support the future service levels needed, 100m platforms and probably will have an option to get more vehicles.Surprise, surprise. Well, cheapening out on a needed build to fund unnecessary underground tunnelling elsewhere.
AoD
How is it cheapening out if service levels won't need that at the beginning of completion. Makes perfect sense to me and there are provisions to support the future service levels needed, 100m platforms and probably will have an option to get more vehicles.
If the amount of time it's taking to get the first relief line under construction is any indication, your use of the word "just" is wildly optimistic.If it gets too crowded too soon then instead of increasing its capacity later just build additional DRLs covering additional routes.
Why is the maximum train speed 80 km/h? There are many straight parts of the line where the train could definitely go at least 100 km/h. This makes no sense.
Wikipedia says TRs have max speed of 88 km/h and max revenue speed of 75 km/h.Why is the maximum train speed 80 km/h? There are many straight parts of the line where the train could definitely go at least 100 km/h. This makes no sense.