They say he had supporters. They didn't say he wasn't there.
Well.. .perhaps you should check out the Globe and Mail
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ant-be-everything-to-everyone/article1628028/
Looks like they agree with me (smaller presence)
Well.. .perhaps you should check out the Globe and Mail
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ant-be-everything-to-everyone/article1628028/
Looks like they agree with me (smaller presence)
Interesting considering he's the 'downtown' candidate.
Wonder if he will return to his council seat.
Were you hoping people wouldn't read that article? Because it didn't agree with you. It said he was there.
An aside to the discussion of mayoral politics but this article is very interesting, discussing how pride has splintered into different political movements. While I support people standing up for whatever they believe in, I'm a bit afraid of what might happen to pride if too many political groups, especially controversial ones like the anti-Israeli apartheid group mentioned, are involved in the proceedings. It seems likely to detract from the overall message of the event.
Which is of course that you should parade naked through downtown Toronto![]()
The dude was handing out condoms with his face on them and you're thinking it was all part of a deliberate strategy to placate the Catholic voters in his ward?
P.S. JOE pants didn't make an appearance at the pride parade?? Deal Breaker!
js97 said:Well.. .perhaps you should check out the Globe and Mail
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1628028/
Looks like they agree with me (smaller presence)
js97 said:i said they agree with me.. (the smaller presence) perhaps you should read my quote again?
Also i proposed it as a question - hence the question mark .