AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
James:
Yeah, but honestly, I do have to question the wisdom of the organizers.
AoD
Yeah, but honestly, I do have to question the wisdom of the organizers.
AoD
I don't usually like Fiorito much, but that's a decent piece.A far more constructive take:
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/art...-we-should-ask-about-the-scarborough-shooting
I don't disagree with anything he has said, but it's only a start. I don't think Fiorito wants to make blanket statements any more than his crime prof or the police chief - but if you're "talking to the shooters" - who are you talking to? How old are they and where do they live, and does their background or upbringing influence who they become?“We spend a lot of money on safe neighbourhoods; that spending needs to be assessed; the guns and gangs task force needs to be assessed.” He thinks we should begin by asking questions of the police, the social workers, the community leaders; above all, he thinks we should talk to the shooters.
What do we think has happened to street culture of crime?And then he nailed the question. “Something has happened in the street culture of crime over the past 20 or 30 years, something that enables people to shoot each other.”
cd108, this isnt this the RF thread or the Scarborough subway thread. I'm talking about about a media bias when it comes to crime reporting in Scarborough and using this shooting as a prime example.
I only brought it up as another example of 'deflecting'.
You can't 'help' things if you can't even discuss them factually. malvern2 is opposed to saying "Scarborough", but if police efforts and government resources are needed to help solve/prevent these sorts of crimes, should they be focusing instead on Mimico?
What do we think has happened to street culture of crime?
What do we think has happened to street culture of crime?
The neighbourhood is apparently called West Hill according to the Star - http://www3.thestar.com/static/googlemaps/starmaps.html?xml=090120_shapetool_neigbourhoods.xml and Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Hill,_TorontoHaha, Mimico, not Etobicoke... you just proved malvern2's point.
I wasn't asking the question to get answers for myself, it was to spur discussion from the article posted.Honestly, watch The Wire.
That's the most bizarre thing I've ever heard.Scarborough isn’t even a city anymore so why even bother saying it? By continuously saying Scarborough in every news article you are painting a huge swath of the city as somehow having involvement in a horrible incident in one small portion of the city. If this happened anywhere else in Toronto the media would never have referred to it as North York or East York and never ever Downtown Toronto….when was the last time a shooting in Jane-Finch was referred to as North York?!
The neighbourhood is apparently called West Hill according to the Star - http://www3.thestar.com/static/googlemaps/starmaps.html?xml=090120_shapetool_neigbourhoods.xml and Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Hill,_Toronto
But then no one would know what area is being talked about. Mimico is an old town itself, and well defined. Not sure how you describe Lawrence and Morningside as anything other that Scarborough. Some seem to be calling it East End Toronto ... but how Lawrence is East End I don't know ... surely East End is west of Victoria Park.
I wasn't asking the question to get answers for myself, it was to spur discussion from the article posted.
No thanks on The Wire - it's no more appealing to me than Oz was.
It's not an 'appealing' conversation, but a real event that happened in our city that needs to be discussed, and not a TV show?Then I wonder how this discussion is appealing to you?