News   Jul 15, 2024
 137     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 332     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 1.8K     1 

GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

The domed canopy is gone. shame but I'm still excited! From link:
rutherford3-1024x663.jpg

rutherford2-1024x663.jpg

Love the third express track in the rendering. They really should just put in in from day 1 so proper express service can happen on the Barrie Line.
 
A. The contract was already awarded last week.
B. Clearly, you don't live in the area and not use this station.

C. Maybe if there was some TOD in the area he would be willing to move there and use the station ;)
 
More likely it's for freight.

Barrie corridor expansion projects are being speced for 3 track capability (two tracks will be built to start. I think the only bottlenecks are Snider and the future Davenport Diamond. Metrolinx has mentioned that longer term, it will be for express service. But in the meantime, yes a third track would help with the freight conflicts we've seen.
 
Love the third express track in the rendering. They really should just put in in from day 1 so proper express service can happen on the Barrie Line.

Yes, it's for express service, in the final configuration at lesat.

Recall the RER 2025 plan is to run Barrie trains all-stop to Aurora then express to Union. That's in addition to bi-directional all-stop trains from Aurora to Union at a minimum of 15 minute frequencies rush will likely see much higher frequencies given ridership projections. That combination requires 3 tracks through all stations at very least.
 
Last edited:
I have a friend who used to work for GO transit and she said that Whitby station was due for the construction of a new station building on the south side but we haven’t seen anything done about it. Are there any plans for a second building at Whitby station?

It's been rumoured to be in the cards for going on 20 years now - basically since the extension to Oshawa.

But considering that all that's happened is the construction of the parking garage and the bridge to it, I suspect that's all that's going to happen.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
 
Some shots from the LSW Train today.

At Exhibition GO, they are working on the new pocket track. The switch has been in for a while, but now new tracks are extending from it. Strangely, it dead-ends at the existing platform.
5gOsHyK.jpg

1yqvbYI.jpg

aXmmdNk.jpg


At Union, there are a bunch of new tracks ready to go in, and the extended platforms used for the VIA Canadian are being restored.

1yJjF3d.jpg

Y9zvqEB.jpg
 
^That pocket track has been there for a while now. It is used for storing maintenance equipment. As you can see in the photo, it hasn’t received a more substanstial set of ties.

The switch was roughed in back when the Dufferin interlocking was rebuilt. It’s there as futureproofing, and the use of the stub for maintenance gear (which would otherwise have to be taken off the rails) is just clever use of it.

- Paul
 
^ And here @alexanderglista got @TOareaFan's hopes up Exhibition construction had resumed.
lol....but I don't actually care about resuming construction on the station.....just finishing the tunnel extension and opening up that entrance that was already built on the north side to alleviate the tunnel crush after events. This might be the next thing that ML said was impossible under their old masters that they might find a way to do now? Perhaps?
 
^That pocket track has been there for a while now. It is used for storing maintenance equipment. As you can see in the photo, it hasn’t received a more substanstial set of ties.

The switch was roughed in back when the Dufferin interlocking was rebuilt. It’s there as futureproofing, and the use of the stub for maintenance gear (which would otherwise have to be taken off the rails) is just clever use of it.

- Paul

I've been out of province for grad school since September, so didn't notice the new track! And it makes sense as a storage track for now. Metrolinx neeeds to get rolling on Ex station. It's crazy for TFC games.
 
Because the topic comes up so regularly, but little documentation has reached the public domain - there is, after all, no EA - I decided to offer an amateur view of just what makes the Milton Line such a daunting route to enlarge. Here's my commentary for those who wonder why more isn't happening quickly.

The tour of the line, with comments:
- The route is two tracks, with a short stretch of third track east of Erindale.
- West of Scarlett Road, all the GO related infrastructure is on the north side. If track is to be added, the most logical place to add track for GO is on the north side. The most logical place to add track for CP freight is on the south side.
- Headways at rush hour are now low enough that CP cannot make any use of the north track - it is effectively dedicated to GO
- The one track available for CP, on the south, is a straight shot from Milton to Scarlett Road. CP can run unidirectionally while GO is occupying the north track, but has no place for trains to meet anywhere on the line. Off-peak, CP can currently use both tracks to run bidirectionally,
- Even when two tracks are available, CP has virtually nowhere to stop a train without fouling level crossings. A 14,000 foot train travelling at 30 mph will foul a crossing (gates down to gates up) for approximately 6-7 minutes. If the train moves slower, as it will if it has to decelerate to a restrictive signal or accelerate from a stop, the blockage can easily be ten minutes. This is fundamentally unacceptable in an urban area due to traffic volume and the potential need for emergency vehicles to cross. This constraint rules out more creative running patterns. (Note the mileages on my map to demonstrate how restricting this is)
- Because CP has no place to bypass a freight train, there is no place where GO can run a counterflow train at peak, or run a frequent 2WAD service, unless more track is added to keep the second GO direction away from CP freights.
- A look at Google Maps shows that a third track has already been roughed in at many of the existing grade separations and culverts. However, there are seven creeks/rivers that would need new bridges to create a second GO track on the north side. A couple of these are pretty major spans. In addition, there are two road separations that would need a new span. Only a couple of the stations have passenger tunnels under the track, and these would be needed. All of this construction, plus grading and fill and sound walls, is needed to give GO a two track corridor....not cheap.
- Now consider what it would take to give CP more track capacity . Since the new GO track would use up much of the roughed-in capacity, even more new bridges and overpasses would be needed. I counted nine creek bridges and twelve road separations that would be needed to give CP two way capacity on the line.
- Don't forget there may be any number of utilities, fiber cables, sewer and water mains, gas mains, and who knows what else that would have to be relocated. I have no data on any of this.

What would I do?
Phase I
- Double track the zone from Dupont to Union. No pointing fingers at CP when MLcan't run bidirectionally if it wanted to... this zone is a prerequisite to upgrading Milton service.
- Build a new GO track Dixie to west of Cooksville, giving GO a 2-track mainline from Royal York to Erindale. Initiate turnbacks from Erindale at peak. Possibly, CP would allow turnbacks to use the first trainlength of the Orangeville line. Depending on headways it would be possible to interleave one or two of these with the peak service without adding track west of Erindale. Off-peak, hourly service to Milton would be possible. Interleave with hourly turnbacks at Erindale, and you have 30 minute headways from Erindale to Union.
- Upgrade the Obico South Service Track to a main line, with signalled switch east of the West Mall (CP calls that location 'The Annex') giving a freight siding on the south side of the current main line. Gives CP another contingency to manage freights.
- Add a passing track for CP on the south side running from 10th Line east to Meadowvale, allowing CP some ability to run bidirectionally while GO is occupying the north track.

Back of envelope cost estimate: $200 million, without upgrading stations.

Phase II
- Grade separate the level crossings at Erindale Station Road and Wolfedale Road. That would give a zone where a second CP freight track could be added. Adding that track would greatly improve CP's ability to run its own trains while GO makes fuller use of the current north track. The new track would start east of the Credit River, and end west of Cooksville.
- Judiciously add GO track west of Streetsville so that GO trains can pass each other out there.

Back of envelope cost estimate: $300 million

What's left?
- Don't even think of more than 30 minute 2WAD without building a flyover around Lambton or the Humber River. Too much interference to CP.
- Adding even a third track through Streetsville is problemmatic. Start working with the community to figure that one out. We might well end up with a Weston-like tunnel.
- A third and fourth track over the Credit River will be needed once Streetsville is figured out.
- Grade separate 5th Line, 6th Line, 9th Line, and 10th Line to give CP more flexibility and eventually lay a full second CP mainline, plus a full GO second main line.
- Link the second CP main line from west of Cooksville to that new mainline east of Dixie/Annex.

Cost estimate to complete? Easily $1 Billion.

All of this is just my musing, driven by some general informed comments from experts but without any inside knowledge of plans etc. CP and ML might have totally different opinions and requirements.

If there were one single thing I would do to improve service.... it's see what CP would charge to implement a turnback using the Orangeville line as a stub track. Run a couple of trains out from Willowbrook before the morning peak, and interleave these with the ten Milton based trains to add seats on closer headways from Streetsville east. Reverse the process in the afternoon. Or at least to Erindale. Once ML has rebuilt the Canpa interlocking, it may have the ability to run trains out the west end of Willowbrook Yard and up the Canpa without conflict with LSW trains. That would solve the dearth of storage at Milton.... but that initial $200 million for new track would probably avoid the expense of four $50 trainsets, so it's a very cost effective way to build the line.

Sorry to be verbose.

- Paul

Milton Triple current state v2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Back
Top