AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Gensler confirmed.
42
Nice! Very corporate, but good to see them branch out to other, internationally regarded firms. (and yes, they are responsible for Shanghai Tower).
AoD
Gensler confirmed.
42
The mansard roof was, in fact, a later addition. The building on the corner was originally a two-storey house, with the third storey and mansard roof added when it was renovated into a hotel two years later, in 1875. I agree the tudor facade was probably added later.I got a feeling the tudor facade may have been a later addition though. The mansard roof just doesn't jibe.
Why not consider that Toronto architecture of old might have been a bit wonky (or whimsical if you prefer) for some buildings? We venerate anything old that's left, but maybe they were occasionally as slap-dash then as we are, occasionally, today.
Perhaps, but i'm not sure they had the luxury of being all that deliberately slap-dash about it then (generally speaking of course), it was a far less disposable/consumerist society and things had to be made to last. I imagine any shortcomings in design and/or execution we might perceive are more about lack of resources or limits to technology and equipment. These places are still standing though and often without the best of ongoing maintenance and care.