AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
DtTO:
La Defense exists precisely because they don't want to have skyscrapers in the historical core.
AoD
La Defense exists precisely because they don't want to have skyscrapers in the historical core.
AoD
uhhh...Toronto has plenty of examples of streets lined by 1-3 storey buildings. The difference is that Yonge is arguably the most important street in the city. Show me a picture of Tokyo's most important streets, and I guarantee you that they aren't lined by 2 story dilapidated townhouses. Even the cities that value heritage the most, in the European Union, had the sensibility to modernize their main business areas (ex. La Defense, Paris). Nobody's asking to tear down St. Lawerence here. The fact is that Yonge isn't as glamorous as the historians on this site make it out to be, and I'm not only referring to it's current form, but also it's potential with the current massing. It's sad when the city's most important road becomes an area to avoid when showing out of towners around, and I know I'm not the only one with this sentiment.
uhhh...Toronto has plenty of examples of streets lined by 1-3 storey buildings. The difference is that Yonge is arguably the most important street in the city. Show me a picture of Tokyo's most important streets, and I guarantee you that they aren't lined by 2 story dilapidated townhouses. Even the cities that value heritage the most, in the European Union, had the sensibility to modernize their main business areas (ex. La Defense, Paris). Nobody's asking to tear down St. Lawerence here. The fact is that Yonge isn't as glamorous as the historians on this site make it out to be, and I'm not only referring to it's current form, but also it's potential with the current massing. It's sad when the city's most important road becomes an area to avoid when showing out of towners around, and I know I'm not the only one with this sentiment.
DtTO:
La Defense exists precisely because they don't want to have skyscrapers in the historical core.
AoD
Why do you keep bringing out-of-towners to Yonge Street if your so embarrassed by it?
I know this has been pointed out countless times to you but I couldn't resist, you seriously bring guests to Yonge street ? Why ? I never do, I never recommend it, I'm referring to the part a little bit south of Bloor to about College / Dundas. Why bother ? There are so many other interesting places in Toronto to visit, the only apeal of Yonge is its proximity to the core.
I specifically said that I *avoid* Yonge when showing out of towners around.
I don't, I avoid it just as I'm sure you do. Still, you can't avoid that area forever, especially since the Eaton Centre and Yonge/Dundas Sq. are very close by, so it's inevitable to have to traverse that stretch of crap. We should be proud to bring people on Yonge, not drag them in the opposite direction. Like it or not, even Aura is 100 times than just about everything on the stretch of Yonge you mentioned.
Besides, I'm not sure how much you know about La Defense, but I assure you that the area was not as barren (before it was modernized) as you seem to suggest. Paris decided to scrap everything, and look at the result; a beautiful, contemporary neighbourhood free of diseased, mainstreet-fronting townhouses.
Hands up, everyone who can't believe DtTO said that unironically.
I understand, but my point is that this specific stretch of Yonge isn't all that unique. We've already built our downtown here. We can't just move it somewhere else. Besides, I'm not sure how much you know about La Defense, but I assure you that the area was not as barren (before it was modernized) as you seem to suggest. Paris decided to scrap everything, and look at the result; a beautiful, contemporary neighbourhood free of diseased, mainstreet-fronting townhouses.
https://maps.google.ca/maps?q=La+Dé...=jrYYvEETE1bJf6dngch8Dw&cbp=12,83.55,,0,-9.03
Wouldn't we all want Yonge to turn into that one day?
*hands up for Adma
Paris has plenty enough to scrap everything - we don't
And sorry, Yonge isn't the most important street in the city contrary to what the rhetoric has been (and if it is important, it is precisely due to its' history).
You really haven't made a case why selective demolition and redevelopment wouldn't revitalize the street - when adding multi-story towers failed to do so for Bay.
One could take a wrecking ball to Yonge street south of Bloor down to Dundas and only Spacing Magazine would have a hissy fit. It's disgusting. And I would know as I live less than a block away. Talk about lack of civic pride. The whole strip looks like a Meth Lab.
One could take a wrecking ball to Yonge street south of Bloor down to Dundas and only Spacing Magazine would have a hissy fit. It's disgusting. And I would know as I live less than a block away. Talk about lack of civic pride. The whole strip looks like a Meth Lab.
You're right. This is so much better: https://www.google.ca/maps/preview#...1!2m3!1sdnQX9uw-P8qXKwpQ8rBt-g!2e0!7e11&fid=5
[/Sarcasm]
This is just it, though. In the case of Yonge, we do. Nothing on that street is really all that unique. One can find many architecturally similar buildings, with similar massing in other areas of the city.
I disagree. Yonge is important simply because of its location.
By what standards is Bay a failure? Sure, it isn't what it could've been, but it's far from a failure. Anyways, one only needs to look at Cityplace, the Entertainment District, and St. Lawerence to see that development in Toronto has evolved far beyond the simplistic one use model that Bay was built upon. In fact, some of the newer developments on Bay are a perfect embodiment of that evolution; all you have to do is compare the old (ex. ROCP) with the new (ex. Burano).