Rainforest
Senior Member
All the internal Metrolinx reports I’ve seen have been credible. It’s the external reports released to the public that’s the problem: at that point the government whitewashed and suppressed any dissenting information, far beyond the point of objectivity. Given that the government hasn’t had the opportunity to corrupt this report, I’d say it’s credible.
Mind that the government and Metrolinx would have no motivation to disparage the SSE, which makes this report critucal of the project even more credible.
I agree on this point. All transit-related reports funded by the public money should be released to the public, and should not be tampered with.
The government has the authority to act against recommendations given by the experts, and outline the reasons for doing so. But the government should never withhold or alter any report just to make its position easier to defend.