So you're basically saying you want more SkyTrain articles because you personally want a SkyTrain.
You're complaining about The Star being biased, but only because they're not biased in a way that suits you.
Why would they report on a fringe possibility that was never really endorsed by any official agency?
If you read through the Neptis Foundation report, it's quite clear that why it wasn't taken as seriously. It calls for canceling the DRL, while keeping a 2 stop Yonge Subway extension to Richmond Hill.
It certainly didn't endorse any kind of Scarborough subway.
The Star is reporting on the two final options that were considered - the LRT and the subway. They're reporting on the subway now because it's been reduced to one stop, the cost has ballooned (and will continue to) and there are councilors that feel it should be questioned.
It's real news, and I'm quite glad the public is being informed of the facts by a source that's far more impartial than Rob Ford was, or than Doug Ford or John Tory are.
If you don't argue the facts, then how can you dismiss these SSE articles that demonstrate serious cost and planning issues as nothing more than an 'agenda'?