TheTigerMaster
Superstar
Honestly some of these ideas that get bandied about on here go from bad to worse. Sometimes I'm glad politicians make decisions and not bureaucrats/technocrats.
Why?
Honestly some of these ideas that get bandied about on here go from bad to worse. Sometimes I'm glad politicians make decisions and not bureaucrats/technocrats.
I don't follow your logic. If anything, the completion of the Line 2 extension makes the Line 4 extension less likely. Councillors would say we're already spending billions on subways to Scarborough and we're not going to spend any more on another underused line.
I don't follow your logic. If anything, the completion of the Line 2 extension makes the Line 4 extension less likely. Councillors would say we're already spending billions on subways to Scarborough and we're not going to spend any more on another underused line.
If anything, the Line 2 extension has emboldened the subway nutheads to think that "since we succeeded in killing the LRT, maybe we can do it again on Sheppard". I don't think the Sheppard subway is likely to happen, however there a real chance that the Sheppard LRT will be killed and nothing gets built, which the subway nutheads would prefer.
That somehow will never be a Scarborough-specific tax. That's fantasy land.Stop it. We have to pay for subways somehow
That somehow will never be a Scarborough-specific tax. That's fantasy land.
It's a pattern of killing LRT development, witness Salsa:I don't follow your logic. If anything, the completion of the Line 2 extension makes the Line 4 extension less likely. Councillors would say we're already spending billions on subways to Scarborough and we're not going to spend any more on another underused line.
If anything, the Line 2 extension has emboldened the subway nutheads to think that "since we succeeded in killing the LRT, maybe we can do it again on Sheppard". I don't think the Sheppard subway is likely to happen, however there a real chance that the Sheppard LRT will be killed and nothing gets built, which the subway nutheads would prefer.
Either way they killed the SRT and are trying it again. They had success the first time.Actually I would think that's what people who doesn't use transit would prefer. I mean, recall the "honk if you support subways" crowd - that's what it's about. You don't honk on a bus.
AoD
Actually I would think that's what people who doesn't use transit would prefer. I mean, recall the "honk if you support subways" crowd - that's what it's about. You don't honk on a bus.
AoD
We're talking about right now. Right now, Scarborough councilors got the SRT overturned, barely. Now they want to over turn the SELRT. What makes you think they would stop at the Bloor Danforth extension?
There is no doubt that the B-D extension switch wouldn't have happened without the subway to Vaughan. Is there any doubt that the B-D extension will not encourage the SELRT to be cancelled and switched to subway? The only question is how successful it will be.
Oh, it's a new phenomenon is it?We're talking about right now.
Budget?Right now, Scarborough councilors got the SRT overturned, barely. Now they want to over turn the SELRT. What makes you think they would stop at the Bloor Danforth extension?
The passenger demand on the Spadina subway extension exceeds the existing Sheppard subway in the 2031 Metrolinx Big Move modelling, with a peak-point ridership of 7,200 compared to 5,900 (in 2031!) on the Sheppard subway. East of Victoria Park, the Sheppard subway ridership is forecast to be much lower than the existing Sheppard subway. Sure, the last couple of station in Vaughan are a big questionable, but it's only another 2 km of subway past York University, and Toronto isn't paying a cent. The Sheppard subway extension to Scarborough Centre is over 8 km long, with lower ridership than the Spadina extension - at least past Victoria Park (i.e. the entire length in Scarborough). And then there's the other 7 km or so to Meadowvale which the LRT is planned for ...Why is Vaughan getting a subway (with worse ridership then either Scarborough subway)is Sobara and politics.
Bingo. From both passenger demand and budgetary constraints.Exactly. I would say that if anything, reverting back to the SLRT would make the Sheppard East Subway MORE likely, not less. Conversely, staying with the Bloor-Danforth extension would make the Sheppard East Subway less likely. Going with the B-D extension would make it easier for Council to say "Scarborough is already getting it's subway, we stick with the approved plan for Sheppard".
To me the hate for LRT is ridiculous, so I see it as unprecedented.[/QUOTE]Oh, it's a new phenomenon is it?
The whole thing getting canceled is more likely to happen, but tell Brad Dugid, Rob Ford and Norm Kelly that. They seem to think that Scarborough needs 2 subways and a underground LRT.Budget?
Oh, I expect they'll try. And they may well get the entire project cancelled, and the federal/provincial funding withdrawn (particularly as the TTC sugar daddy in the federal cabinet who funded Sheppard East LRT, Spadina subway extension and the Danforth subway extension is no longer there). Perhaps the federal money will instead go to building infrastructure in ridings that the Conservatives have more chance of winning - like in Oakville ... or Milton.
That's actually weaker then the Bloor Danforth extension. Bloor Danforth is somewhere around 8500-9500. So it really begs the question why any of these are even options. What you said about Sheppard East is correct but Spadina is not much better, if at all.The passenger demand on the Spadina subway extension exceeds the existing Sheppard subway in the 2031 Metrolinx Big Move modelling, with a peak-point ridership of 7,200 compared to 5,900 (in 2031!) on the Sheppard subway. East of Victoria Park, the Sheppard subway ridership is forecast to be much lower than the existing Sheppard subway. Sure, the last couple of station in Vaughan are a big questionable, but it's only another 2 km of subway past York University, and Toronto isn't paying a cent. The Sheppard subway extension to Scarborough Centre is over 8 km long, with lower ridership than the Spadina extension - at least past Victoria Park (i.e. the entire length in Scarborough). And then there's the other 7 km or so to Meadowvale which the LRT is planned for ...
Bingo. From both passenger demand and budgetary constraints.
Either way they killed the SRT and are trying it again. They had success the first time.
Kelly seems to be quite well aware it would likely be cancelled, and quite comfortable with that. He's commented that it would be better if nothing was built than LRT.The whole thing getting canceled is more likely to happen, but tell Brad Dugid, Rob Ford and Norm Kelly that. They seem to think that Scarborough needs 2 subways and a underground LRT.
7,000 or so for Spadina isn't that bad. If it was 20,000, no one would be able to get on by Eglinton West! You can't have 30,000 on the last station on the line! Also, it has a huge off-peak AND counter-peak flow because of York University.What you said about Sheppard East is correct but Spadina is not much better, if at all.