doady
Senior Member
Those numbers are very misleading. Mississauga and Brampton have much higher densities and more dense clusters like Brampton Centre and area around Sq 1. which allow for better transit. Those numbers really show that the transit usage in Peel is terrible for a region of almost 2M people.
Peel has 1.2 million people. And the numbers are already adjusted for differences in population. Hence, the use of the term, "per capita." I do think the transit ridership in Peel is much better than in York Region, but that was not the point.
While York has 1M people, only about half of them live in area that can be served by transit, and those are areas mostly south of Hwy 7, and along Yonge. Remember, York Region as a whole is still about 60% rural, versus Peel which is now mostly built up, except for a small section around Caledon.
If we want to gage the success of Viva, you need to look at the ridership not at York Region as a whole but look at the two corridors: Yonge and Hwy7. Other that VIVA, YRT hasn't really improved their services enough to dramatically increase ridership. It's VIVA Purple and VIVA Blue that have seen ridership numbers increase in their respective corridors.
Yonge and Highway 7 are the busiest routes in the region by far. They are most important corridors. If they saw a major improvement it would be reflected in region-wide numbers.
The fact is, York Region spent $180 million, a lot on branding, and they expected major increase ridership region-wide, but they saw less improvement than either Mississauga and Brampton.
I would also argue that once the BRT are up an running, ridership will increase even more. For now, VIVA is nothing more than just a comfortable express bus.
Which is exactly my point. VIVA relied mostly on marketing, but it didn't work, and so I don't see why Brampton or Mississauga should follow the same path.