To freshcutgrass,
I just noticed your comment below in a previous page and I completely missed it…
Toronto also "acted" the part...which is why it had far more impressive buildings and skyscrapers than Montreal.
And Montreal didn’t “act†the part?
The above statement is not fair at all and I’ll tell you why…
First of all, Montreal has a height limit of 200m on all its buildings, which is the elevation of Mount Royale, so that limits what architects can do with tall structures.
Secondly, we don’t know what kind of buildings would have been built had Montreal remained to be the economic centre of Canada prior to the Quiet Revolution in the 1960’s.
In spite of that, the city has some truly impressive buildings and sites to witness; I mean they created a man-made island in the middle of the St. Lawrence River for God’s sakes!
The Olympic Stadium looks far more impressive than the Rogers Centre in my opinion, especially when you consider that it’s the tallest slanted structure and stadium in the world.
Have you seen anything in the world that looks like the Biosphere?
What about Habitat 67?
Even churches, is there any church in Toronto that has the same grandeur as St. Joseph’s Oratory? It’s the biggest church in Canada and has the second biggest dome in the world after St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican. Notre Dame Basilica looks just as fabulous if not better.
Who has more geographical coverage with more impressive stations, the Montreal Metro or the Toronto Subway?
What about the Westmount City Hall? The Museum of Fine Arts? The Casino?