News   Jul 11, 2024
 4.8K     0 
News   Jul 11, 2024
 417     4 
News   Jul 11, 2024
 539     0 

Waterfront: Portlands Sports Complex (8s?, RDH Architects) DEAD

But the impetus for the stacked design was not to be a catalyst, but to put some lipstick on the pig of the sprawling single-level design originally proposed. And I would argue that the particular location is not planned to have the kind of road and transit support that one would want for something that will draw large boluses of people at particular times.

Seriously, what's up with your metaphors? You're making yourself sound OCD and agoraphobic!

Are you actually suggesting that the Design Review Panel were trying to beautify a sus barbatus? Come on. The City and Waterfront Toronto have been consistently using this strategy along Queens Quay, Sherbourne Common, the West Don Lands, and the Port Lands.

It works.

As for your planning argument, your point is moot. Build the asset and people will come. The plan for the area is for LRT lines, and its road links are more than satisfactory. After all, it was a bustling industrial hub for most of the 20th century.
 
Seriously, what's up with your metaphors? You're making yourself sound OCD and agoraphobic!

Sorry, I had assumed most people were familiar with that metaphor, especially after it came to prominence in the last US presidential election.

As for your planning argument, your point is moot. Build the asset and people will come. The plan for the area is for LRT lines, and its road links are more than satisfactory. After all, it was a bustling industrial hub for most of the 20th century.

As I understand the planning, the area is intended to be primarily residential, and I shudder to think what the traffic will be like as four games end and pour out of that facility onto the streets.

But I think we can at least agree that the waterfront shouldn't be used for such a sprawling project, and that the stacked design was an improvement on the original suggestion.
 
The area is planned on being mixed-use. Residential will be the most prevalent, but there will still be plenty of commercial, office, and community uses. By suggesting that all four games will end at the same time tells me that you have spent minimal amount of time at most going to a 4-rink ice pad. The scheduling for the games are usually offset by 15 minutes in order to flood the ice. I can see them having two zambonis so at most there won't be more than 2 games scheduled to start at the same time. The amount of traffic the facility will have on the local infrastructure will be minimal
 
Don't shudder. Hockey rinks aren't big traffic generators and they generate traffic off-peak. You won't even notice the traffic. In fact, if you combined this site with an office or, say, film studio use it would barely even need parking (which is what started this redesign fustercluck to begin with).
 
Not really. It's a catalyst project.

Yes, that's the justification that has been used. Here's another reason it exists: the city hasn't been keeping up with demand for ice time, so they take the easy way out to throw multiple rinks in an isolated area where it's easy to build rather than within the communities who need the ice rinks now. Since the area will not become inhabited for decades, it will remain a sprawling suburban complex accessible only by car just like T&T, FilmPort, Canadian Tire, the Smart Centre development, and all of the other developments turning the mouth of the Don river into a suburban landscape.
 
National Post has an article on the Hearne today and refers to a demolition permit for the Hearne - it was applied for in August 2010 and is ready to be issued.

Application: Demolition Folder (DM) Status: Ready for Issuance

Location: 440 UNWIN AVE
TORONTO ON M4M 3B9

Ward 30: Toronto-Danforth

Application#: 10 241855 DEM 00 DM Accepted Date: Aug 18, 2010

Project: Industrial Demolition

Description: Proposal to demolish existing 8-storey generating facility structure, the "Hearn Power Plant" (20367m2) to the top of the slab. Generating stack to remain. No proposal for replacement building at this point.

The NP article says:


Peter Kuitenbrouwer: Hearn is a part of our heritage

The Richard L. Hearn Thermal Generating Station, Toronto’s largest and most remarkable heritage building, is in danger of imminent demolition. That must not happen.

Wreckers demolish just about everything in this unsentimental town, but even Toronto saves a building now and then. Take Old City Hall. In 1967, the Eatons wanted to knock down our Richardsonian Romanesque jewel in red sandstone (1899) for an even bigger Eaton Centre, and preservationists went to the barricades. The good guys won. Now it’s time to fight again.

The Hearn, built in 1952 at 440 Unwin Avenue, just east of Cherry Beach, is a late-deco behemoth in red brick with translucent windows; its 70-storey smokestack remains one of the 10 tallest structures in Canada. Since 1993, when Ontario Hydro stopped producing electricity here, it has sat empty.

Studios of America, a company in Vaughan with a lease on the Hearn power plant from Ontario Power Generation, has applied, with its wrecking company, Quantum Murray, to demolish the Hearn.

“The lease deal [which runs until 2024] allows them to demolish the building for development, as long as appropriate laws are met,” says Ted Gruetzner, a spokesman for OPG.

The Toronto Building Office web site notes a “Proposal to demolish existing eight-storey generating facility structure, the ‘Hearn Power Plant’ to the top of the slab. Generating stack to remain. No proposal for replacement building at this point.”

City spokesman Bruce Hawkins adds, “The permit has not been issued as we are awaiting the Municipal Road Damage Deposit.”
Councillor Paula Fletcher (Toronto-Danforth), in whose ward the Hearn sits, is ringing the alarm. She will bring a motion before city council on Thursday that the city “reaffirms the city’s interest in the protection and preservation of the Hearn Generating Station,” and that council, “request that OPG, prior to exercising its right to demolish the property, hold a public meeting and consult with the ward councillor, the chief planner,” as well as officials with Heritage, Economic Development and Waterfront Toronto.

Other fans are lining up in the Hearn’s corner. Councillor Adam Vaughan (Trinity-Spadina), voted against a plan to spend $80-million on a new, four-storey stacked ice rink in the port (a rare point of agreement with Rob Ford) because Mr. Vaughan believes we should build our Portland hockey and skating palace in the Hearn.

“The reality is that the industrial engineering would make it perfect for a hockey rink,” Mr. Vaughan said on Monday. “It’s cheaper to reuse it than to demolish. We wouldn’t have to build an $80-million rink. It’s the smartest thing to do. We have $34-million (from Ottawa) that has to be spent on the waterfront on a sports facility, and we have to do it soon.”

Studios of America agrees. Paul Vaughan, a spokesman for the company, has written to Case Ootes, who headed Mayor Rob Ford’s transition team, and to Ms. Fletcher, begging them to talk to him about using the Hearn for a hockey rink. (Studios of America has drawings by architect Stefan Behnisch in Stuttgart of rinks in the Hearn.) No one has replied. Hence the application to demolish.

“We are spreading our options to every possible alternative,” Mr. Vaughan says. “If Rob Ford wants to save the taxpayers $56-million and build his rink there, then God bless him. If someone else wants to demolish and build big box retail, so be it.”

On Monday I reached Dan Dubowitz in Tuscany. He is a British photographer who travels the world, exploring wastelands. Mr. Dubowitz took photographs inside the Hearn in the past few weeks; one of those photos appears in his current show at Toronto’s Bau-Xi Gallery. He loves the Hearn.

“Every city wants its Tate Britain, its Sydney Opera House, its Guggenheim Bilbao,” Mr. Dubowitz says. “Cities all over the world would be over the moon to have a building like the Hearn. It’s there. It doesn’t need to be knocked down. It’s got parking all around. Everything is perfect. It just needs will, funding and inspiration.”

All of which are occasionally available in Toronto — just look at the Brickworks, Distillery and Wychwood Barns. We have the power to make this happen.

pkuitenbrouwer@nationalpost.com
.

Read more: http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/1...earn-is-a-part-of-our-heritage/#ixzz1867dAWGr
 
To lose an impressive industrial building like Hearn that has so much reuse potential would be very regrettable. Hume needs to pick up on this issue. We can't let this happen.
 
There's certainly enough room inside, and if we're no longer building the stacked complex, repurposing the Hearn would be a decent alternative.

I wonder, though, if this might be a tactic by its current owners to strong-arm the government into taking an unused, empty building off their hands.
 
Converting it to hockey rinks would be very expensive. As would the maintenance costs.

I think for a conversion to be worth all that money it would have to be for something very notable. Perhaps an aviation and space museum? An aquarium? Rob Ford's buffet table?
 
An interesting note- the company renting the property would prefer to see it reused if the money dedicated to the Portland Ice Rink would go its way instead.



Heritage Toronto joins fight to save Hearn generating station

Peter Kuitenbrouwer December 14, 2010 – 7:42 pm

Heritage Toronto, an arm’s-length city agency funded mainly through donations, has entered the fight to save the enormous Hearn Generating Station, a listed heritage building in Toronto’s port lands.

Tyler Anderson/National Post

Hearn Generating Station

“This building is a symbol of the former waterfront of Toronto,†said Gary Miedema, historian at Heritage Toronto. “The Hearn was built there so it could easily receive coal brought up the St. Lawrence Seaway. In a place where everyone thinks that there is no history, this is a building that could anchor that history.â€

Heritage Toronto posted an urgent note on its web site late Tuesday calling on Torontonians to save the Hearn.

Last August, Ontario Power Generation, which owns the building, applied for a demolition permit for the structure, according to Armando Barbini, manager, plan review at the Toronto Building department.

“We have received an application for demolition from an agent for the owner, or an employee of OPG, or it could be a demolition company, on behalf of the owner, which is OPG,†Mr. Barbini said.

He said the city has no power to refuse the demolition permit, and is merely waiting for a road damage deposit before it will issue the permit to the wreckers.

“We’ve been given advice that the Ontario Heritage Act is not applicable to a provincial agency,†Mr. Barbini said. “It’s in the hands of the province.â€
Related

OPG, which is provincially owned, insisted yesterday that it has not applied to demolish the Hearn, but that the application came from Studios of America, a company with a lease on the Hearn that lasts through 2024. OPG said the tenant’s lease permits it to demolish the vast structure.

The generating station, built in 1949-51 of structural steel, reinforced concrete slab floors and brick infill walls, bears the name of Richard Lancaster Hearn, an engineer, nuclear power entrepreneur, and chairman of Ontario Hydro from 1955-1956. When it opened in 1951 it was the largest thermal-electric station in Canada.

Studios of America spokesman Paul Vaughan said his company would prefer to reuse the building, and has asked the city to put its four hockey/skating rinks, for which Ottawa has donated $34-million, into the structure. He said he has invited Mayor Rob Ford and Councillor Paula Fletcher to tour the Hearn.

Ms. Fletcher said she has not received Mr. Vaughan’s invitation. She believes the province, which owns OPG, should step in and save the Hearn. “All eyes are on the waterfront,†she said. She will present a motion to city council Thursday in support of saving the Hearn.

A representative of Mr. Ford’s office said the Mayor would have no comment on the issue.

Readers lined up on both sides of the issue yesterday.

“It simply boggles the mind that anyone can see any ‘aesthetic’ value in restoring the Hearn,†wrote Paul Millar, an investor who owns heritage property in Toronto. “And to think that it might be a viable option to convert this into some kind of ‘ice palace’ for the sum of $32-million. Please!â€

But Madis Pihlak, an associate professor of architecture at Penn State university in Harrisburg, Pa., wrote to say that one of his student groups is worked on plans for a training centre in the structure, adding, “the Hearn is an amazing building that should not be demolished.â€

And William J. Phillips, a retired electrical utility engineer in Nova Scotia, noted that Nova Scotia Power is converting the Water Street Thermal Station, a smaller version of the Hearn on the Halifax waterfront, into a new corporate HQ, set to open next year. “The Hearn should not be demolished and in my view a rink is only one of many interesting possibilities that the building offers.â€

National Post
pkuitenbrouwer@nationalpost.com


Read more: http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/1...-save-hearn-generating-station/#ixzz1897U9chd
 
from today's Daily Commercial News, posted with the usual caveat......

SPORTS COMPLEX Proj: 9043030-16
Toronto, Metro Toronto Reg ON PREPARING PLANS

Portlands Sports Centre Project, 85 & 95 Commissioner's St, Unwin Ave, Cherry St, Port Lands, M5A
$34,000,000 est

Start: October, 2011 Complete: October, 2013

Note: Cons is undertaking preliminary planning, sustainability and finalization studies. The scope of work for a stacked arena was approved in principle by City Council late Fall 2010. Owner is seeking final City Council development and funding approvals. Prequalification for General Contractors was issued by the Owner's Rep early 2010. Schedules for Working drawings and Invited tender to be issued to six proponents are undetermined pending approvals and direction from City Council, anticipated early 2011. Further update Spring, 2011.
Halsall Assocs Limited are the LEED Consultant for the project.

Project: proposed const of a regional sports complex in the Port Lands area. The project will consist of an eight-storey all-glass facility with four ice pads stacked on top of each other. Some of the pads could be left dry at times to be used for basketball, soccer or lacrosse. The first rink would be halfway below ground and the next three would rise above at approximately two and a half storeys each; surrounded by glass. Some underground parking would be available with addition parking at grade. The project will be certified under the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating system.

Scope: 180,000 square feet; 2 storeys; 4 units
Development: New
Category: Recreational bldgs; Public bldgs
 

Back
Top