adma
Superstar
I think you may have nailed it.
...Though I find a lot of women and straight guys on other architecture forums.
And don't forget the comment threads on Spacing, Torontoist, et al...
I think you may have nailed it.
...Though I find a lot of women and straight guys on other architecture forums.
I have noticed a gay-friendly overtone to this website
You'll notice this pattern in architecture/urban planning/transportation forums from other locales as well, so it's really not just a UT phenomenon - though what might be unique is that the core group of gay UTers actually know each other in real life, and some of us we're a bunch of carry overs from the pre-UT days even.
And no, not all the mods are gay. About half and half.
AoD
I just think most women either don't know about this site and/or just can't be bothered with contributing to messageboards of this ilk? I don't know a single woman who posts on messageboards but know of a whole bunch of men that do.
Straight guy here. Do people really use the accronym LGBT/GLBT? What about the undecided?I apologize if I offend anyone, but so what? I for one find that labels are use by people who are just looking for control of one thing or another. We are who we are, I my be a demographic to a politician buy to myself I am an individual that shares or does not share the opinions of others.
A ratio of LGBT/GLBT, etc to "straights" is meaningless to me.
(a little ranty but labelling pisses me off)
Straight guy here. Do people really use the accronym LGBT/GLBT? What about the undecided?
It's the same in my line of work. I am a translator and practically all the translators I know are gays or lesbians. It may not be relevant, but it is interesting.