DavidJamesTO
Active Member
I hope they don't go with that much grey.
I like your design much better. Think we can convince TTC/Bombardier to go with that and move a headlight into the middle?
I hope they don't go with that much grey.
Don't be so quick to criticize the existing CLRVs now that we are getting new streetcars, Mr. Hume. I'd say if it wasn't for the CLRVs Toronto might not have a streetcar network today, and you won't have a new streetcar design to drool over.
The CLRV streetcar is unique to Toronto. It's the number one transportation icon of modern Toronto, and shows up in quite a number of postcard shots of the city. I'd like to see it retired honourably, and some should be preserved in a heritage fleet.
What? No PRIMOVE Catenary-Free Technology? Darn.
Some North American city sooner or later will most likely order the Bombardier Primove and everyone here in Toronto will be wondering why we didnt. Then again i guess it makes more sense for a more up to date eco-city that has the majority of its hydro wires already buried underground to be ordering this kind of technology.
What? No PRIMOVE Catenary-Free Technology? Darn.
I actually question how much serious examination it was given. I'm in an urban planning class where Rod McPhail (Transportation planner for Toronto) is the prof, and I brought up the technology with him regarding its potential use on Transit City. He was unaware of it, but seems intrigued by it, and has told me he's going to look into why it isn't in the TTC's plans. When he gets back to me, I'll let you all know what he says.
The PRIMOVE technology would be considered a luxury item.
At one time, air conditioning was considered a luxury. That is why there's a $100 air conditioning tax on motor vehicles. Wonder if the TTC will have to still the air conditioning tax on non-petroleum vehicles like streetcars or subway cars?