Dan416
Senior Member
Is it allowed to get petitions signed on TTC property? I'd think Don Mills would be the most natural place do so, since Don Mills will be the new Kennedy.
The fact that my postal code starts with an L and I live in Mississauga should be an eye opener, not a detriment. The fact that someone from Mississauga can see the benefit to a line that doesn't directly influence him whatsoever should show you that I don't have personal interests at stake.
I thought we had moved beyond petty 416/905 bickering. But apparently not.
I'm not arguing that your opinion isn't well-founded because, seriously, in an ideal world with unlimited funds, Sheppard would and should be a subway to STC.
I'm just saying, as someone who is attempting to start an anti-Sheppard LRT movement, your Mississauga address hurts you. Campaigns like SOS and the anti-Blue22 folks in Weston got some traction with the media because they were founded by local people who could present relatable stories about how the transit plans would hurt their day-to-day lives. (Even if they were both kind of dumb.) You, as a transit fan from Mississauga who is unlikely to use any transit on the Sheppard corridor on a day-to-day basis, are not a good face for this movement.
You want this to work? Find some people who actually live and work on Sheppard who are concerned about the current plan. Then try to get local Councillor support. Continually profess your support for the TTC and the expansion of rapid transit. Avoid allying yourself with those who talk about the war-on-cars at all costs. Wear sunscreen.
I'm just saying, as someone who is attempting to start an anti-Sheppard LRT movement, your Mississauga address hurts you. Campaigns like SOS and the anti-Blue22 folks in Weston got some traction with the media because they were founded by local people who could present relatable stories about how the transit plans would hurt their day-to-day lives. (Even if they were both kind of dumb.) You, as a transit fan from Mississauga who is unlikely to use any transit on the Sheppard corridor on a day-to-day basis, are not a good face for this movement.
Ding.Its almost as if they want to start building the shepaprd east line jsut to put the nail in the coffin for the possibility of a sheppard subway extension.
The "war on car" thing isn't as ridiculous as many downtowner's think it. At least for something like Sheppard, the nearest alternative (Finch) is more than 2 km north. Yea, there is the argument that people will just switch to public transit, but by the TTC's own numbers the SE LRT won't induce anyone to switch. Almost all of their ridership growth is due to expected population growth, not modal shifts. If you just take away capacity without adding a viable alternative (as in, something that travels faster than a bicycle), drivers do have a bit of a fair concern.
As for the petition goes, most of you really have NO CLUE how powerful it can be. If the petition gets enough support and visibility, the TTC might still refuse to cancel the line but that will put pressure on them to review the line. 23km/h is a real joke and if the petition and the arguments we put forward make them understand that we get that this line is NOT rapid transit, its a good compromise if they were to change it.
Uhh... most of Transit City's biggest boosters come from south of Bloor and chances are will never ride the SE LRT either. I don't think that really counts against them, except for when their plan for transit improvement on Sheppard centers around dreams of turning big box stores in the middle of nowhere into quaint little European villages. Someone from Mississauga or York Region would probably have a better understanding of suburban transit usage then your average TC booster, who then spends the rest of the day throwing out Kunstlerian denunciations of anything that isn't the Annex and about how Peak Oil will totally screw up everything.
It's simply addressed "To: City of Toronto ". It does later on mention "the Toronto Transit Commission, the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada" but it's addressed only to the City. An your making fun of my reading comprehension??? ROTFLMAOIf you read the body it's addressed to Toronto, TTC, Ontario and Canada. So shows your level of reading comprehension.
can anyone answer me why miller and the rest of the ppl behind transit city were so eager to get the sheppard east line started first? If anything i'd imagine the finch west would be more logical seeing as how it will connect to the future spadina subway extension (a line that will start tunnel boring soon) and accommodations must be met for it at the future keele station. Its almost as if they want to start building the shepaprd east line jsut to put the nail in the coffin for the possibility of a sheppard subway extension.
It's simply addressed "To: City of Toronto ". It does later on mention "the Toronto Transit Commission, the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada" but it's addressed only to the City. An your making fun of my reading comprehension??? ROTFLMAO
And it doesn't even mention the responsible agency - Metrolinx
The petition site asks you to address an organization. I chose the organization responsible for this mess.
Metrolinx? Don't make me laugh.
My understanding of English grammar says that "We the undersigned petition the City of Toronto, the Toronto Transit Commission, the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada" is addressed to all four entities mentioned.It's simply addressed "To: City of Toronto ". It does later on mention "the Toronto Transit Commission, the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada" but it's addressed only to the City. An your making fun of my reading comprehension??? ROTFLMAO
And it doesn't even mention the responsible agency - Metrolinx