42 ... did you intend to quote someone else when you posted the above comment? (you quoted my comment, but it looks like you were responding to one of the earlier posts about which stretch of John might best be shut down).
Cabeman - rereading my reply to you, I don't know exactly what I thought I was responding to at that moment. I understand what you're saying, which is a different point than whatever I addressed in my reply (and I agree with your potential purchaser perspective) but I wonder now if I had skimmed it too quickly and constructed something else in it that's not actually there. So, sorry about that - it looks like speed reading through posts can result in the occasional mishap.
42