turbanplanner
Active Member
So is MX's credibility not a relevant point? Can you explain why?
Look how many paragraphs you've typed out? if you ACTUALLY cared about the truth you'd ask her. Anything else is a waste of energy.
Toronto Ontario Line 3 | ?m | ?s
- Thread starter JasonParis
- Start date
Look how many paragraphs you've typed out? if you ACTUALLY cared about the truth you'd ask her. Anything else is a waste of energy.
fanoftoronto
Active Member
@turbanplanner if you ACTUALLY cared about the truth then you'd ask her.
It is relevant. But again, there's no proof that in this specific case MX did any wrongdoing. Innocent until proven guilty! Again, easily remedied if the supposed appraisal was shared with Global News. All we have right now is he said she said!
turbanplanner
Active Member
I go out of my way to post photos of construction in the city, I’ve emailed metrolynx with questions.
I don’t care enough to do the legwork on this story but everyone else is free to do so! You’d think with all the back and forth someone would take initiative? Crazy thought, I know?
fanoftoronto
Active Member
You'd think someone who argued the loudest on an unproven slight by Metrolinx would've cared enough to do the legwork on this story. You'd think with all the back and forth, @turbanplanner would take initiative? Crazy thought, I know?
Also, many of us on Urban Toronto contribute in a similar fashion to what you describe. And those who don't contribute like that also play their share in discussions and seeing others post. Unlike the others here, you seem to also have the tendency to toot your own horn, so to speak. Not a great look.
ARG1
Senior Member
Reading Comprehension, feel free to reread my post. You'll find the answer to your points in there.
turbanplanner
Active Member
Can you show me some initiative you've taken in general? I regularly post construction photos etc.You'd think someone who argued the loudest on an unproven slight by Metrolinx would've cared enough to do the legwork on this story. You'd think with all the back and forth, @turbanplanner would take initiative? Crazy thought, I know?
Also, many of us on Urban Toronto contribute in a similar fashion to what you describe. And those who don't contribute like that also play their share in discussions and seeing others post. Unlike the others here, you seem to also have the tendency to toot your own horn, so to speak. Not a great look.
You've written a lot, don't bother writing more about this though. If you wanted answers you'd ask HER not me.
fanoftoronto
Active Member
I don't need or want your approval. If you want, check my post history. This information is publicly available, unlike the secretive 2,500 sqft appraisal that you've been harping about.
I've spent enough calories trying to be reasonable with you. This is going to be my last response to you as you refuse to have a reasonable conversation and have side steps most points that has been brought up with irrelevant information.
Good day to you @turbanplanner.
Btw, I really appreciate your responses, @ARG1
Undead
Senior Member
Please stop derailing the thread.
felix123
Active Member
Reposting my question from right before the thread got derailed, in case it got lost amongst the catfight: anyone know whether the TBM launch/re-excavation site will be at Pape south or Pape north?
fanoftoronto
Active Member
I'm not sure if I understood the question correctly. From the information I can find in the Metrolinx website, the TBM launch shaft is going to be at Pape South and the TBMs will be tunnelling north from here.
I would presume that the TBMs will tunnel up to Pape station, will have to be dismantled south of the station and launched again north of the station and continue tunneling until the north portal at Minton Pl leading to the Don Valley bridge.
T3G
Senior Member
A thought I had, looking at Carto Metro's track map of Toronto rail. Is this accurate? Is there really not going to be a crossover before either terminal station?????
cartometro.com
Detailled Toronto transport map (track, depot, ...)
cartometro.com
max
Active Member
That track map for line 3 is quite woefully out of date as it still shows the east/northbound track along the LSE corridor as being on the south side.A thought I had, looking at Carto Metro's track map of Toronto rail. Is this accurate? Is there really not going to be a crossover before either terminal station?????
Detailled Toronto transport map (track, depot, ...)
adys123
Active Member
A thought I had, looking at Carto Metro's track map of Toronto rail. Is this accurate? Is there really not going to be a crossover before either terminal station?????
Detailled Toronto transport map (track, depot, ...)
Without crossovers at the terminals, it would be essentially impossible to run the service. Rest assured that they are part of the plan and that the Carto Metro map is very high level. Additionally though, crossovers will be located after the terminal stations (that's why there are long tail tracks) to support 90 second headways.
smallspy
Senior Member
It's not accurate. There are lots of errors on many of the lines.A thought I had, looking at Carto Metro's track map of Toronto rail. Is this accurate? Is there really not going to be a crossover before either terminal station?????
Detailled Toronto transport map (track, depot, ...)
That said, they frequently will "dummy in" the alignment of the line without any crossovers or special work, as those are frequently not finalized until much later in the process and so aren't known to the authors.
Dan
T3G
Senior Member
Thanks for the info. If you can, are you able to elaborate on what other errors there are on the map?
I guess we are a long way from anything that resembles Peter Dougherty's NYC trackbook.