androiduk
Senior Member
The glass for Shangri-La & Four Seasons is from the same company (http://www.fnglass.com/). They are also doing 222 Jarvis, FCP and Union Station.
I can't believe anyone would pay $1500 psf
Bay-Adelaide is a very nice building. It's got great cladding/facade on the outside, and contemporary interiors. It's boring, boxy design doesn't bug me though, as it fits in perfectly with the skyline. (reminiscent of First Canadian Place as well).
Four Seasons is the "sexier" version of Bay Adelaide. With a slimmer design, and more sophisticated design (with a few setbacks and balconies)
Both have little fins at the top.
Though I'm neutral on which one is better. Though they share many common and different features, Both are entirely different towers in purpose, location, etc....
The glass for Shangri-La & Four Seasons is from the same company (http://www.fnglass.com/). They are also doing 222 Jarvis, FCP and Union Station.
Four Seasons = mediocre?
Wait, what?
Merely my layman's opinion yet I would have expected more design and material for the money. Not only that but the building really does not match the rendering. It seems the sum parts nowhere near approach the value of the whole. An exercise in Canadan premium brand exploitation no doubt.
Again my final judgement is reserved for the end product assuming I one day have the privilege of visiting an actual suite.
Merely my layman's opinion yet I would have expected more design and material for the money. Not only that but the building really does not match the rendering. It seems the sum parts nowhere near approach the value of the whole. An exercise in Canadan premium brand exploitation no doubt.
Again my final judgement is reserved for the end product assuming I one day have the privilege of visiting an actual suite.