[I can't understand how this station got put back in when it is a maximum 4 minute walk away. You will be able to see ferrand station from Don mills station. ]
Well, it's probably a little closer to 6 minutes, since the access to Ferrand will be at the intersection with the off ramps. Unless you jay-walk across Eglinton to get to the west end of the platform. Which no one would do.
You're making the assumption that everyone who wants to use the Eglinton line is standing on Eglinton when this thought occurs to them. But they aren't. There are a number of large residential and commercial buildings north and south of the stop that will be withing 5-6 minutes' walk of Ferrand, therefore 11-12 minutes from the Don Mills station. This would be why local residents spoke up for restoring the stop.
Unless those buildings are located within the DVP ramp loops, the residents will not have to walk all the way to the DVP off ramps. Thus, the 6 minute walk is not accurate. Thus they would still be 10 minutes walk or less from the Don Mills station.
How odd. Last month Ferrand was out "due to geometric constraints," now it is back in exactly the same place as before.
Could it be that Metrolinx just wants to get rid of it because of speed and thought they would try to slip it through with the Don Mills launch plan?
Besides the Ferrand stop that cannot be built - but now suddenly can, I would also like to understand the portal relocation better as well.
Property Constraints. The questions to answer are; why was this condo project allowed to proceed and interfere with the biggest transit project in Toronto's history, now that it is built What would the cost of shoring the building foundations be, and How much can people from the condos complain about noise when other launch and extraction sites are not that far removed from residential areas and the condo is at a site that has been known to be under construction (for the portal) for about 5 years.
Traffic Impacts. A large source of the traffic impacts are due to the median LRT that is trying to be designed, requiring a realignment of Eglinton Ave. If the portal is on the South side of Eglinton for a South Side alignment, traffic disruption would be greatly reduced or almost eliminated.
Slope Stability. The concerns seem to be on the north side of Eglinton, thus simply locate the LRT on a South side alignment and not in the median.
Soil Contamination. What would the cost be to remove this soil. Although there is a great extent of contaminated soil shown, only that in the vicinity of the portal and West abutment (for the bridge over the West Don) would have to be removed.