News   Jul 16, 2024
 650     0 
News   Jul 16, 2024
 581     0 
News   Jul 16, 2024
 724     2 

Rob Ford - Why the Supervillian?

Don't be so sure most of them aren't from Toronto and that they won't be mad enough to vote. Keep in mind that these polsters aren't polling the 905.

They may not be polling the 905 area.. but I'm sure they've come across many 905'ers who were in Toronto at the time they were polling.

And quite frankly, I doubt anyone (un)intelligent enough to throw their support behind Ford would be able to figure out when or how to vote. And even if they could they probably wouldn't be bothered.

So I think (and sincerely hope) that Toronto is safe for now...
 
Yeah, hopefully the election will coincide with a NASCAR race on TV, or an episode of The Bachelorette, or something.
 
They may not be polling the 905 area.. but I'm sure they've come across many 905'ers who were in Toronto at the time they were polling.
The usual custom is to phone home numbers, which makes it pretty easy to identify where they are calling.
 
In the US they often break down polling to "likely voters". I've never seen that in Canada, though perhaps it would be too difficult or expensive to get a sufficient sample size.
 
You know Royson James is licking his chops, and somewhere deep down I'm sure Sue Ann Levy is actually cheering for those "socialist seals" in "silly hall" to take the reigns of power yet again.
Royson James is an opportunistic hack. Sue Ann Levy ... she's the ditzy tv host on the Mary Tyler Moore Show?
 
Possibly the most favorable news article written about Rob Ford yet. Maybe the media isn't as biased as I thought:
---

Talkin’ bout a revolution: Could Rob Ford take Toronto City Hall?
Tasha Kheiriddin June 14, 2010 – 10:45 am
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com...lution-could-rob-ford-take-toronto-city-hall/

Is common sense coming to Canada’s largest city? Two new polls show Toronto councillor Rob Ford running neck and neck with former provincial health minister George Smitherman in the race for the mayor’s chair in Toronto. In a CTV-Globe and Mail survey, Mr. Ford bests his closest rival, 17.8 per cent to 15.9 per cent, while all but one of the other contenders fall into single digits. In a Toronto Star poll, Mr. Smitherman rates 29 per cent to Mr. Ford’s 26 per cent, with their nearest challenger, publisher Sarah Thompson, sitting back at 17 per cent.

Both surveys reveal a high undecided vote, 38.9 and 44 per cent, respectively. They also show Mr. Smitherman’s numbers slipping precipitously in the last six months: in January, a Star poll had him at 44 per cent, while in April, a another Star survey showed “Furious George” falling to 34 per cent.

It appears that Toronto voters are looking for an alternative to the tax-and-spend ways of both City Council and the provincial Liberal government in which Mr. Smitherman prominently served – and Mr. Ford is their man. No surprise there – the penny-pinching councillor represents one of the few taxpayer-friendly voices in Toronto. His website lists the voting record of council on a host of issues, and it’s not pretty.

Outgoing Mayor David Miller and his band of merry spenders routinely threw taxpayers’ money at pet projects large and small: $347,000 for “graffiti murals”, $175,000 so Councillor Sandra Bussin could sue a local newspaper for defamation, and $7,000 to send then-councillor Kyle Rae to an AIDS conference in Austria. Meanwhile Council refused to declare garbage collection an essential service, reduce the mayor’s office budget from $2,4 million to $2,2 million, or publish the list of mayoral campaign contributions above $25.00.

Indeed, during the past eight years on Miller Time, many Torontonians felt their city had veered to the left of Lenin. Throughout that period, one of the few sensible voices on Council was Mr. Ford, whom I had the pleasure to meet several times when I worked for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. An affable and no-bs kind of guy, ten years in office have not changed him: Mr. Ford is still known for his penny-pinching, straight-shooting ways.

And also, for shooting his mouth off, which is the candidate’s Achilles Heel and the one thing which might prevent him from winning this election. Over the years, Mr. Ford has made some off-colour remarks about gays, cyclists, and minorities, as well as had a rowdy outburst at a Maple Leafs game. His family life has also has its share of turbulence.

But so far in this campaign, Mr. Ford has not missed a beat. If he manages to definitively overcome his foot-in-mouth disease, then he has a shot at Toronto’s top job. And beleaguered taxpayers have a chance to keep more money in their wallets, instead of sending it to City Hall. It’s a long way to the election in October, but there’s finally a race worth watching.
---

Ford is an interesting candidate and has a very good chance of winning. He may be a bit crazy when it comes to some social issues but as a mayor it wouldn't really matter much. He seems like a down to earth guy, with something that has been lacking in every level of government in Ontario-- common sense and integrity!

If/When Rob Ford is Mayor, watch the corrupt ones slink back under their rocks! No more buffet behind the wall, free dinners, passes and vehicles for the corrupt ~~ oh my ~~ what will they do when they have to buy their own dinners? hahahaha
 
Why are conservatives so often in favour of designating transit and/or garbage collection essential services? Is it just ignorance? I can't understand why they'd be in favour of something that always results in much higher labour costs.
 
If/When Rob Ford is Mayor, watch the corrupt ones slink back under their rocks!

This whole thing of penny-pinching from Ford gives rise to a question.

He goes on at length about how he spends none or next to nothing of his office budget, as if this is a badge of honour.

But what is the purpose of the office budget? Is it not intended to cover things like mailings to constituents, office supplies/equipment and the like?

Is Ford not running an office and doing the sorts of things this budget was intended for or is he paying for all this out of his own pocket?

If the latter, then how legitimate is that? Presumably spending his own money means he doesn't have to file expense reports with the city that would be available for public perusal, so in theory he could be drawing on the wealth built up in the family business, monetary levels that are not available to other councillors of more modest backgrounds, to spend excessively on self-promoting things like campaign newsletters, neighbourhood functions and whatever else catches his fancy or boosts his ego.

Now, one can say it's his (or his family's money) and he can spend it how he likes, but is it really a fair or equal setup where one's external financial status has a significant influence on political spending?

This is not to say that all other councillors are spending their budgets wisely, but at least the voters have visibility into how they are conducting their professional political activities. We don't see that when someone doesn't use the funds specifically allocated to that and instead draws on their private trust fund.
 
One good thing about Smitherman is that you can always count on him to go for the throat:

Rob, since you were first elected, taxpayers have paid you over $1,034,281 in salary and benefits.

The problem is you have another job. A real busy one.

You are also the Chief Financial Officer of Deco Labels & Tags. It’s your family’s business and it’s pretty big: over 250 employees in Toronto, Chicago and New Jersey and close to $100 million in annual sales.

Most CFOs will tell you they usually work more than 60 hours a week. Given the fact that you always describe yourself as a “businessman†and never as a “politician,†it’s clear which job has been your priority.

It’s no wonder your fellow councillors have described you as being: “poorly briefed on reports and frequently absent from debates and votes.â€

The real question is - if you haven’t been a full-time councillor – why have you been cashing a full-time pay cheque?
 
Maybe the media isn't as biased as I thought.

Those poor conservatives, so deprived of good media attention. I mean they only have three daily newspapers, (Post, Sun, and Globe), the two most popular networks (CTV and Global), and all of talk radio.


If/When Rob Ford is Mayor, watch the corrupt ones slink back under their rocks!

You mean like the last real scandal to hit city hall, where Rob Ford was firmly on the side that was trying to bury and cover it up?
 
Rob Ford pushed really hard to keep Julian Fantino (and mused recently about bringing him back) which doesn't lend him much credibility on the He'll-stop-corruption point.
 

Back
Top