Fred.S
Active Member
Maybe we can have the Gardiner just veer south and go down into the lake. That would eventually clear up traffic pretty good...
Cost-wise I think you are looking at around $500 million for that.
Maybe we can have the Gardiner just veer south and go down into the lake. That would eventually clear up traffic pretty good...
In any case, the Western stretch of Gardiner is staying put - the only question remaining is what to do with the section east of Jarvis.
AoD
Do we have any evidence that if Gardiner is removed, traffic will be a chaos?? Or it is all just subjective guess - because it is busy so removing it must lead to chaos?
Often people quickly adjust to alternative travel patterns. For example, traffic on Richmond and Adelaide is never too busy and I have never seen congestion on these two streets during rush hours. There are things drivers can do. Not everyone is stupid enough to think since Gardiner is gone, all I can do is to stick to Lake Shore Blvd, where Gardiner originally was.
In doing any long term improvement, you must be willing to pay a short term price. You can't expect a perfect solution sacrificing nothing. Ask Bostonians whether the big dig is worth it, most will say yes, despite the complaint when it was happening.
We can't do this because of this and that, so let's keep it as it is. This is typical Toronto thinking. We'd rather let the negative scare us into doing nothing, other than really weigh the pros and cons and make a good decision that's the best for the long term interest of the city and its people.
Toronto can't live without the Gardiner otherwise where will the car go? keeping tell us this forever and we will be stuck with this hideous thing forever until it collapsed someday killing thousands of lives.
junior43:
Removing or renewing a piece of infrastructure while it is being used will be chaotic regardless of time. It's not really a reason not to do it though because the alternatives are that much worse.
As to traffic in the West Donlands - it wasn't like the area (on the periphery) is stranger to traffic. Most of those cars are destined for the core, and it has to get off the Gardiner at some point. That's pretty much a reality of planning in general.
AoD
It would also be an interesting experiment. Shut down the entire Gardiner for July. (In theory less drivers, since teacher's are off) And see what commute times turn into.......I think you'd quickly find out how important the Gardiner is. If not in the municipal election, definitely in the provincial one.
yeah, let's.
I am positive the city will function. There will be traffic jams, but it is not like it goes smoothly now. Everytime I pass gardiner at Spadina it is like a zoo, obviously something is not working, and it is definitely NOT because we don't have enough highways or there are too many cars. It is the horrible design or roads and ramps that lead to such a mess almost any time of the day.
Too true, but now all that Gardiner traffic is in your face, your were complaining about it before the extra cars showed up. Enjoy the future, it's more of the same...... I coulda sworn McGuinty had a pledge to reduce commute times. How does removing any portion of the Gardiner achieve that????
reduce commute time?
let me suggest again for the 100th time, live closer to work. works 100 times more effective than expecting a great subway/highway system.
yeah, you will say many people can't etc, the truth is, they can't let go their big detached house with a deck a yard all that sort of suburban features.