News   May 29, 2024
 52     0 
News   May 28, 2024
 1.4K     1 
News   May 28, 2024
 1.8K     0 

New day, new political scandal

Now let's look at the more serious side of the issue, from the Post:

David Akin: Isotope firm questions Harper's plan to abandon production
Posted: June 11, 2009, 10:15 AM by NP Editor
MDS Inc. of Mississauga, Ont. announced its financial results this morning. MDS is the parent company of MDS Nordion, the Kanata, Ont.-based company which buys all of the medical isotopes produced by Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.'s at the Crown corporation's Chalk River Laboratory.

For the three months ending April 30, MDS Nordion had an operating profit of US$23 million and net revenue of $65 million. That was down from the same quarter last year of $24 million and $80 million. MDS also had this to say in its press release this morning:

After the end of the quarter, in May 2009, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) announced that its National Research Universal (NRU) reactor would be out of service for at least three months. Based on historical EBITDA trends related to NRU-supplied isotopes, MDS expects the financial impact of this shutdown to reduce MDS Nordion's adjusted EBITDA by approximately $4 million for every month the NRU is out of service. MDS is assessing plans to reduce costs over the extended shutdown period. MDS Nordion continues to deliver positive EBITDA from sterilization technologies and radiopharmaceutical product and service lines.

MDS continues to work to secure a long-term reliable supply of medical isotopes. In 1996, MDS Nordion contracted with AECL to complete and commission the MAPLE reactors, which were intended to replace the NRU. In May 2008, this project was unilaterally discontinued by AECL and the Government of Canada. MDS invested over $350 million in the MAPLE project, and believes that the completion of the MAPLE reactors is the best solution to provide global medical isotope supply. More recently, MDS Nordion urged the AECL and Canadian Government to consult with international experts and obtain their assistance to activating the MAPLE project to address the current medical-isotope supply shortage. In addition, MDS Nordion is examining longer-term supply alternatives and announced in the second quarter its collaboration with TRIUMF, Canada's national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics, to study the feasibility of producing a viable and reliable supply of photo fission-based Molybdenum-99.

This will have some relevance today. Last night, we reported: Prime Minister Stephen Harper says Canada plans to leave the production of medical isotopes to other countries — despite the fact that for a time last year, this country was producing nearly all such isotopes in the world.

“Eventually, we anticipate Canada will be out of the business,” Harper said Wednesday. [Read the rest of the story]

AECL -- again, it's a Crown corporation so taxpayers stand behind its obligations -- signed a deal with MDS Nordion guaranteeing a 40-year supply of medical isotopes. The MAPLEs were to produce that 40-year supply. MDS is suing AECL and Canada for $1.6 billion for cancelling the MAPLEs. What now will AECL and Canada owe MDS Nordion now that the prime minister has rather abruptly announced that Canada is out of the business altogether and will not -- MAPLEs or no -- honour its word to MDS Nordion to provide it with medical isotopes for the next 40 years?

MDS Nordion executives, as it happens, had already been scheduled to testify today at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources (hashtag #RNNR for you Twitterers) where executives are expected to make the case for the MAPLEs. Both Liberal and NDP MPs are pushing the government to at least have international experts review AECL's decision to kill the MAPLEs.

Why is all this important? The medical isotopes at Chalk River help 2 million Canadian cancer and heart disease patients every year.

National Post

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/...ions-harper-s-plan-to-abandon-production.aspx

AoD

I'd like Canada to stay in the isotope business, but isn't Chalk River's time almost up? It's a very old reactor and as we've seen it's having more and more problems these days. Without knowing a lot about the business of producing medical isotopes it's clear there's a good reason production isn't just shifted to Pickering or Darlington. From the article it becomes a matter of restarting these MAPLE reactors and the costs associated with them versus the costs in lost isotopes in not doing so. If the costs aren't prohibitive I'd certainly like to see Canada get back into the business of isotope production as it seems like a very profitable and important enterprise overall.
 
Apparently the Maple reactor(s) is fundamentally flawed, and can't be fixed. At least, that's what AECL told the CPC, which caused them to cancel the project. No excuse for not creating a plan for a new medical isotope reactor.
 
This whole thing is a massive and embarrassing f*ck up.



This country was once a world leader in nuclear technology.

Once.
 
unimaginative:

She isn't the only one - quite frankly, for her to flog this fact in defense of her behaviour just makes it doubly worse.

AoD
 
From the Post:

Raitt reassures Canadians: 'It’s not like we have no isotopes'
'It’s not like we have no isotopes. This week we had 75% of our normal supply.'

Katherine Laidlaw, National Post
Published: Thursday, June 18, 2009
TORONTO -- Minister of Natural Resources Lisa Raitt tried Thursday to assuage public fears that Canada is in the throes of a grave medical crisis, saying world isotope experts are working on a solution to medical isotope shortage and getting the Chalk River, Ont., facility up and running again is a top priority.

"We do have a shortage of medical isotopes. The province, the government and the medical community have been working together to ensure those who really need the medical isotopes will get medical isotopes," she said. "It's not like we have no isotopes. This week we had 75% of our normal supply."

Ms. Raitt was in Toronto yesterday to meet with international isotope experts. She said the other four reactors, in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and South Africa, are meeting the worldwide demand for isotopes, but if something happens to one of those reactors that could change.

"Even with Canada down, the total global need for isotopes is met by those four other reactors," she said. "With one of the others down, total global need will not be met."

Isotopes are used to treat and diagnose illnesses such as cancer and heart disease. Canada's reactor, the 52-year-old NRU at Chalk River produced more than half the world's supply of isotopes before it closed due to a radioactive water leak on May 14.

The Chalk River facility supplies 80% of the isotopes used by two million Canadian cancer and heart-disease patients every year.

The government has said they will look at other forms of diagnostic testing to supplement a Canadian shortage. The Canadian medical community has expressed concern with relying on other forms of testing, calling them less effective and more expensive.

Getting the Chalk River reactor running again is the top priority for Atomic Energy Canada Ltd., the Crown corporation responsible for the reactor, Ms. Raitt said yesterday.

"The Canadian government has made it very clear to AECL that this is their priority and getting Chalk River's reactor up and running safely and producing medical isotopes is the most important thing they can be doing right now," she said.

The three-month timeline for closure of the reactor is still accurate, she said. When asked if she was satisfied with AECL's work to locate the leak and restart the reactor, Ms. Raitt paused and responded, "we would like things to move faster."

Revisiting the cancelled MAPLE reactors project, which concluded last year after producing not a single isotope and coming in hundreds of millions of dollars over budget, wouldn't solve the world's current problem, Ms. Raitt said.

"To revisit it... there was a lot of study done," she said. "Even if in 2008 it was determined that it could be fixed, the timeline would still be 5 to 10 years."

Ms. Raitt said she hoped yesterday's meeting, which was scheduled to last all day, would address the production of isotopes by the four other reactors, as well as a new reactor in Australia that is nearing production stage. "The reality is reactors around the world are very old," she said. "We think the most appropriate thing we can do right now ... is look at things as a whole."

The group, meeting to discuss the world's isotope supply and distribution, was formed by the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The group has met twice since January and also participated in two conference calls, Ms. Raitt said. Members of the group include representatives from the four countries with operating reactors as well as countries dependent on isotopes but who don't have their own reactors, she said, adding that experts from Japan and U.S. were in attendance.

Dr. Robert Atcher, president of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, said Monday that the medical isotope shortage has left doctors scrambling. The Chalk River closure is having a "major impact" on medical care around the world, he said.

"It's clear that too many demands are being placed on too few facilities that are simply too old," Dr. Atcher said.

He said 91% of society members have reported that isotope shortages have affected their ability to perform tests.

"The patient community is facing one of its greatest threats in modern times -- the lack of access to a reliable, consistent supply of the most important medical isotopes used in the effective detection and evaluation of patients with cancers, heart and brain diseases and other disorders," Dr. Atcher said.

With files from Canwest News Service

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1709626
____

Not sure if this makes me want to laugh or cry. Seems like she never learned her lesson. I wonder if that's what happens if you only have 75% of normal brain function...

AoD
 
Gov't won't appeal order to bring Abdelrazik home

Updated Thu. Jun. 18 2009 9:34 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

The Tory government will comply with a judge's order to bring Abousfian Abdelrazik back to Canada.

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson made the announcement in Parliament on Thursday.

Earlier this month, Federal Court Justice Russel Zinn ruled that Abdelrazik's rights have been violated and Ottawa must bring him home within 30 days.

However, there had been speculation that Ottawa would appeal that ruling.

Abdelrazik, of Montreal, has been stuck in Khartoum since 2003 when he returned to his native country.

He was arrested on suspicion of having links to terrorism, but was released and never charged. However, the federal government had refused to let him come home.

One of Abdelrazik's lawyers said the government is making the right decision.

"Government compliance with the order is an excellent and expected step -- something we had hoped for in this file," Yavar Hameed told The Canadian Press Thursday.

"This first new development is very encouraging."

Abdelrazik has denied any involvement in extremism during his ordeal.

Later in the day, NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar made public a declassified Foreign Affairs memo which appears to show that Washington may have had a hand in the file.

In July 2006, the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa suggested that it would like "Canada's assistance in putting together a criminal case against Abdelrazik" so charges against him could proceed in the U.S., according to the memo.

Dewar asked if the White House had played a role in the case.

"What was the role of the Bush administration?" questioned Dewar.


Comments are now closed for this story

zwinky 120 65
I'm glad to hear they don't intend to inflcit any futher abuse on this innocent man.

It is shameful that our government did not do the right thing until forced by the courts since this man was never charged with or convicted of any wrongdoing.



This government does not respect the rights of Canadians, what they do to one they will do to two. It's ironic that they claim to be big on law enforcement when they don't follow the laws with respect to citizen rights where we have to take them to court to fight for our rights but they cut off funding to legal aid...they are a joke. Bushlite.
 
Well, at least when he gets back here he can sue the government and get a big fat cheque. The way he was treated was absolutely intolereable.

A memo was leaked that indicates he was exiled by request of the US government.
 
Paul Koring

From Saturday's Globe and Mail, Saturday, Jun. 20, 2009 03:57AM EDT

A coterie of high-ranking Canadian security officials first considered blocking Abousfian Abdelrazik's return five years ago at the request of a foreign government, but kept ministers of the then-Liberal government in the dark, The Globe and Mail has learned.

Only days before Mr. Abdelrazik was to be released in July, 2004, from the Sudanese prison where he had been interrogated by Canadian agents, a foreign government believed to be the United States made urgent high-level representations to senior Canadian security operatives seeking “Canada's agreement not to allow Abdelrazik to board aircraft bound for Canada.”

That's exactly what happened, although the role of Canadian security agencies remains murky. Mr. Abdelrazik was denied flights by both Lufthansa and Air Canada. Ever since, and as recently as last month in federal court, Canadian officials have claimed Canada had no hand in thwarting his return and that it was strictly an airline decision.

Yet heavily redacted documents suggest Canadian security agencies played a role and kept ministers in the dark.







“Put plainly, I was not informed by anyone of any request seeking Canada's agreement not to allow Abdelrazik to board aircraft bound for Canada,” said Irwin Cotler, who was justice minister in the Liberal government led by Paul Martin at the time.

Yet senior Justice Department officials, along with key security officials at CSIS, the RCMP, Public Safety, Transport and the Privy Council Office, were among the addresses on the closely held memo marked “secret” and circulated to consider blocking a citizen's return.

Mr. Abdelrazik, a Canadian citizen, has been stranded in Sudan for six years while Canada steadfastly refused to issue him documents to travel home. On Thursday, the government agreed to abide by court order to bring him back to Canada.

Mr. Cotler's flat denial that the matter was ever brought to his attention raises the possibility that a group of top Canadian security officials secretly discussed doing the bidding of a foreign government to unlawfully block Mr. Abdelrazik's return without bringing it to ministerial attention.

“If we are dealing with a situation in which a foreign government asked Canada to deny the boarding and the return to Canada of a Canadian citizen, such a decision should certainly have been made at the ministerial level,” Mr. Cotler said.

Mr. Cotler says any extraordinary consideration of denying Mr. Abdelrazik's return was never brought to his attention or to cabinet.

None of the other Liberal cabinet ministers with responsibility for security issues in 2004, including foreign minister Pierre Pettigrew, defence minister Bill Graham and deputy prime minister and public safety minister Anne McLellan replied to written requests from The Globe to comment on the document.

CSIS and the RCMP also declined to comment. Both said Foreign Affairs was now the only department explaining the government's handling of the Abdelrazik affair, but the department also declined to comment.

The “secret” note, dated July 22, 2004, and authored by Scott Heatherington, director of the shadowy Foreign Intelligence Bureau, came after an unidentified foreign government made representations to both Transport Canada – which then ran Canada's no-fly list – and the acting director-general of security at Foreign Affairs.

“It's known that Canada's security services were operating outside of the boundaries at the time,” said Amir Attaran, a law professor at the University of Ottawa.

Details of RCMP and CSIS involvement in the unlawful rendition to torture in Syria of Maher Arar were just surfacing at the time.

“Ministers should have known that the security services were running amok,” Prof. Attaran said, adding he, too, hoped a full-blown inquiry will be ordered into the Abdelrazik affair.

Then as now, Mr. Abdelrazik faced no charges in Canada or elsewhere and had the same constitutional rights as any other citizen to return home. The summer of 2004 was also two years before the Bush administration was to blacklist Mr. Abdelrazik by adding him to the UN Security Council's roster of al-Qaeda suspects.

Several pages detailing why the “foreign government” wanted Canadian agents to help block Mr. Abdelrazik's return, which were appended to Mr. Heatherington's note, have been entirely blacked out.

“What we don't yet know is what Canadian agencies did,” said Paul Champ, one of Mr. Abdelrazik's lawyers.

Mr. Cotler has said it is important that governments – both Liberal and Conservative – be held accountable for what happened to Mr. Abdelrazik. A federal court judge ruled his constitutional rights were violated and his claims of torture were credible.

The government has decided not to appeal the ruling.

Current Justice Minister Rob Nicholson has so far ignored calls for a public inquiry. “He either thinks Canadians are naive or they don't care, and neither is the case,” NDP MP Paul Dewar said yesterday. “Canadians care deeply about this case. They want to know why yet again a Canadian citizen has been left stranded amid allegations of torture.”

Meanwhile, documents implicating CSIS in Mr. Abdelrazik's original imprisonment – without charge – in Sudan have yet to be explained, although the antiterrorism agency has publicly insisted it did nothing wrong and never arranges for the arrest or torture of Canadians overseas.

The rapid-fire timeline from July, 2004, raises doubts about Canadian claims of non-involvement.

Sudanese security agencies told Canadian diplomats early in July, 2004, that they intended to release Mr. Abdelrazik on condition the he fly home to Montreal. Canadian diplomats made arrangements for him to fly to Montreal on July 22, 2004. Then, two days before the Lufthansa-Air Canada flight, a diplomat from a foreign government – believed to be the Untied States – seeks a meeting with Transport Canada security officials in Ottawa. One day later, the same request, backed by a dossier of material, is delivered to intelligence and security officials at Foreign Affairs. On the same day, Lufthansa says it won't carry Mr. Abdelrazik. Air Canada follows up with the same refusal.

Meanwhile, in Khartoum, Canadian consular officers are kept in the dark, as were ministers in Ottawa.

When in August, 2004, an alternative routing via Casablanca is worked out by consular officials in Khartoum, the route home – according to another document marked secret – “was refused by officials in Ottawa.”


Here's an idea, how about those responsible pay the big fat check and not the Canadian tax payer this time!
 
One of the most quietly disturbing things we've found out in recent years is the extent to which senior officials in the Canadian security services appear to take their orders from the United States rather than their putative Canadian political masters.
 
The naivete of this current government is astounding. I hope Canadians step up to the plate and spank them good next election.
 
One of the most quietly disturbing things we've found out in recent years is the extent to which senior officials in the Canadian security services appear to take their orders from the United States rather than their putative Canadian political masters.
That has a lot to do with Canada not having its own foreign intelligence service. That means Canada has to rely on its allies for a lot of its information. And it means there's often no way to verify claims by foreign sources. Other than that, you'll notice that both CSIS and the RCMP cleared Abdelrazik. And they did not co-operate with any US agency to build a case against him. The decision to make his return difficult was entirely political.
 
That's an interesting point, though CSE does collect foreign intelligence. Your second comment doesn't match the article, though. The article clearly says that several senior security officials prevented him from flying home without notifying the Canadian political level. The same thing happened with Arar.
 
I think it's a more a matter of left hand not talking to the right hand. Keep in mind that each of the intelligence offices and bureaus within the government is an independent entity. Whereas Transport Canada might have assessed Mr. Abdelrazik as hazardous to aviation, Foreign Affairs or CSIS or the RCMP could have disagreed (or agreed) with the assessment. And that seems to be what happened here. In the process, it's likely that the ball got dropped.

Also, while unfortunate, I would put down a lot of his misfortune to the fact that his case started in 2004. Canada was just getting its no-fly list setup back then. A lot of the policy kinks were still being worked out. Post-9/11 most intelligence agencies are constantly caught between deciding how far to enforce existing policy, restrict an individual personal liberties, and how much risk to the public to allow, etc. And in the few years immediately after 9/11, there was a lot of chaos behind the scenes. Hopefully, this kind of stuff does not happen again.
 
I know, but look at the article:

Yet senior Justice Department officials, along with key security officials at CSIS, the RCMP, Public Safety, Transport and the Privy Council Office, were among the addresses on the closely held memo marked “secret†and circulated to consider blocking a citizen's return.

That sounds like a pretty comprehensive list, excluding the political level.
 

Back
Top