To all the posters who railed againt me for suggesting there was a media bias to put Scarborough down here is a local councillor Norm Kelly suggesting the same.
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/20/a-place-with-no-name
On the most asinine grounds. I mean, really: if you want to defend yourself, can't you do better than that? Quoting Norm Kelly in the Toronto Sun?
Look, as I've said before: maybe the repeated references to "Scarborough" may have something backhanded to do with Scarborough actually having such a strong
positive identity, even now, 15 years after mega-amalgamation. A strong identity, historically, culturally, etc.
And as I've said before, but may I direct it to you, malvern2: prove your Scarberian mettle. Without Googling,
do you know who Doris McCarthy is?
Because I'll betcha 10 to 1 that these Scarberians who are so self-conscious about their identity that they rally for Rob Ford, *wouldn't* be able to identify her. Because they're "taxpayers", pure and simple. Scarborough is little more than "a place to live" for them--all the cultural/historical stuff is pointy-headed stuff. As Rob Ford would say, they're too busy "working hard and earning their keep" to notice, or care, etc.
But as far as
I'm concerned,
they're the insults to Scarborough.
They're the one's who fuel its degraded no-man's land identity.
And the funny thing is: I'll betcha Rob Ford is the same viz. Etobicoke. You certainly can't see him penning an ode to his turf a la London's "embarrassing right-wing mayor" Boris Johnson.
So...here's a Rob Ford-versus-the-gangs-and-immigrants-esque Scarborough-cultural-literacy proposal to you, malvern2. If you can't identify Doris McCarthy without Googling, tasteless, philistine garbage line you doesn't belong in Scarborough. Get out of Scarborough; get out. Go to the yokelville where you belong. Okay?
(Of course, that last paragraph might as well constitute a "projected" Ford critique in its own right.)
(