News   May 03, 2024
 349     0 
News   May 03, 2024
 255     0 
News   May 03, 2024
 137     0 

Mayor Olivia Chow's Toronto

Cut service around parks e.g. the expensive to maintain Love Park with water fountains and features etc. should be cut
I heard a study done on parks to build it yield the same results as all other studies around park (why people use them and what people want in them)
And the consultant charged the city 500k....????

Save those dollars for more important things.

huh?

To what are you replying?
 
Yes, 'consultation paused".

View attachment 553480
Aka opponents/social media have seized onto it as a "rain tax" and that has gained a memetic life of its own, so depsite Chow's assertions, it is being being paused to allow the media attention to focus elsewhere/quietly sent behind the shed to be shot.

It's just politics, next time get ahead of the press instead of allowing them to define the battlefield.

How hard would it have been to have named it the "floodwater prevention fee" instead? This adds a layer of linguistic armour around it (same as BLM), and allows people to immediately connect the dots.
 
Last edited:
Aka opponents/social media have seized onto it as a "rain tax" and that has gained a memetic life of its own, so depsite Chow's assertions, it is being being paused to allow the media attention to focus elsewhere/quietly sent behind the shed to be shot.

It's just politics, next time get ahead of the press instead of allowing them to define the battlefield.

How hard would it have been to have named it the "floodwater prevention fee" instead? This adds a layer of linguistic armour around it (same as BLM), and allows people to immediately connect the dots.
Yes, it could have been presented better but it is part of a whole array of projects and proposals dealing with climate change and it is wise if they are all aligned.
 
Aka opponents/social media have seized onto it as a "rain tax" and that has gained a memetic life of its own, so depsite Chow's assertions, it is being being paused to allow the media attention to focus elsewhere/quietly sent behind the shed to be shot.

As someone in on the discussions, nothing has been shot yet.

How hard would it have been to have named it the "floodwater prevention fee" instead? This adds a layer of linguistic armour around it (same as BLM), and allows people to immediately connect the dots.

Stormwater charge is the same name Mississauga used when it passed a similar measure years ago without incident.
 
As someone in on the discussions, nothing has been shot yet.



Stormwater charge is the same name Mississauga used when it passed a similar measure years ago without incident.
I was already aware of the stormwater charge in Mississauga, but I admit I didn't know much about it.

In case anyone is interested, here is the link detailing it and there's an informative video about it too. TBH not even sure how something like this got so politicized, seems totally reasonable.

 
Stormwater charge is the same name Mississauga used when it passed a similar measure years ago without incident.
Yes, but memetic status is entirely unpredictable (who knew it would be seized on as the 'rain tax' by global social media), and dependent on a variety of contextual issues. In this case, Chow is continually viewed with suspicion by the right-wingers and the Sun (Kinsella particularly has a hate-on for her), and therefore the stormwater charge became a convenient platform of attack.

My opinion is that labeling potentially politically triggering things explicitly with linguistic armour helps diffuse the issue for low-information viewers.
 
By backing down on police cuts, Chow thought she could appease the police union for at least one year. She was wrong.

Mayor Olivia Chow weighs in on police union request that she condemn councillors over statement about protests​

 
I had been told the Clarence Square encampment would be cleared by now; someone, it seems got cold feet.

However, the police did remove a couple of people running a sizable illicit drug ring out of the camp.


I noted in the past clear evidence of a criminal theft ring. (far more bikes than encampees by a few dozen at least)

This camp does need to be cleared, with compassion for any who are legitimately homeless, but it is clearly a material criminal enterprise more than emergency shelter.
 
I had been told the Clarence Square encampment would be cleared by now; someone, it seems got cold feet.

However, the police did remove a couple of people running a sizable illicit drug ring out of the camp.


I noted in the past clear evidence of a criminal theft ring. (far more bikes than encampees by a few dozen at least)

This camp does need to be cleared, with compassion for any who are legitimately homeless, but it is clearly a material criminal enterprise more than emergency shelter.
Two drug dealers and a bike thief turn the entire encampment into a criminal operation? That's a bad take.
 
Two drug dealers and a bike thief turn the entire encampment into a criminal operation? That's a bad take.

First off, its not one bike thief, its a ring.

Second, the take is fine.

You often give takes without having a single fact in your possession, which should suggest that you remain silent,.

But you're happy to insult multiple posters here for 'bad takes' who have a far better understanding of things than you do.

That's a bad take.
 
Council are again talking about alcohol in parks and, as one might expect, it is taking hours. So far we have 3 motions

Motions (City Council)​

1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Brad Bradford (Final)
That City Council amend Economic and Community Development Committee recommendation 1 to include the following additional parks in Ward 19, Beaches-East York:

a. Stan Wadlow Park, 373 Cedarvale Avenue; and

b. East Lynn Park, 1949 Danforth Avenue.

2. Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Paula Fletcher (Final)
That City Council amend Economic and Community Development Committee recommendation 1 to include Dieppe Park, 455 Cosburn Avenue, in Ward 14, Toronto-Danforth.

3 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor James Pasternak (Final)
That City Council direct that no parks in Ward 6, York Centre, be designated for personal alcohol consumption.
 
Council are again talking about alcohol in parks and, as one might expect, it is taking hours. So far we have 3 motions

Motions (City Council)​

1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Brad Bradford (Final)
That City Council amend Economic and Community Development Committee recommendation 1 to include the following additional parks in Ward 19, Beaches-East York:

a. Stan Wadlow Park, 373 Cedarvale Avenue; and

b. East Lynn Park, 1949 Danforth Avenue.

2. Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Paula Fletcher (Final)
That City Council amend Economic and Community Development Committee recommendation 1 to include Dieppe Park, 455 Cosburn Avenue, in Ward 14, Toronto-Danforth.

3 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor James Pasternak (Final)
That City Council direct that no parks in Ward 6, York Centre, be designated for personal alcohol consumption.

Isn't there a clothing drop box location, a fence dispute or a tree removal we can debate instead? LOL
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DSC

Back
Top