News   Dec 09, 2025
 334     1 
News   Dec 09, 2025
 367     0 
News   Dec 09, 2025
 443     1 

Finch West Line 6 LRT

Council decided not to enable full signal priority years ago. Last year a motion was brought to council to look at enabling it again and they were supposed to get a report beck a few months ago but its been radio silence. City council also has the power to enable better transit signal priority on several bus corridors and on eglinton.

And everyone’s favourite city department - transportation services - is doing the report.

Aka the people that live and die by total vehicle throughput rather than any kind of vehicle throughput metric weighted by passengers. Generally known to be one of the most change resistant departments in the city.
 
And everyone’s favourite city department - transportation services - is doing the report.

Aka the people that live and die by total vehicle throughput rather than any kind of vehicle throughput metric weighted by passengers. Generally known to be one of the most change resistant departments in the city.
Can everyone stop yapping about TSP when that isn't even the biggest issue this line faces?

When Metrolinx/Mosaic were testing the line, they utilized full design speed and were able to have much lower travel times with the same TSP settings we have now.

I don't want to be sitting in a train with TSP at an average speed of 10 km/h.

The TTC needs to be put under fire for its terrible operating procedures. The line could be improved tomorrow if they just drove faster and reduced unnecessarily long dwell times.
 
That's why theres the turnback switch at Laird. There's going to be a branching of services with the Scarborough portion getting the short end of the stick.
I'm only finding out about this now. Something tells me a lot of posters on this thread are unaware of this as well.

Metrolinx wouldn't have built this in if they didn't think underground trains catching up to surface levels trains was going to be an issue.
 
One of the many things that should piss people off about this line is that, by the way it is set up, it is more expensive to run.

They could easily cut these travel times in half by complete transit priority having the trains stop ONLY at stations and then can automatically proceed. Maintaining the 6 minute frequency, would mean that for every 1 trip made currently, they could make 2 and cut the staff by 50%. All this from the TTC and City who say they are starved for transit funding.
 
After years of operating them already? If they weren't ready, it shouldn't have opened. The bad press from this (which I don't think has barely scratched the surface yet), could be epic.
TTC operators HAVE NOT been operating them for years... the first class were only trained to operate them this year about a month or two before RSD even started and the second class only finished training last week.
 
Can everyone stop yapping about TSP when that isn't even the biggest issue this line faces?

When Metrolinx/Mosaic were testing the line, they utilized full design speed and were able to have much lower travel times with the same TSP settings we have now.

I don't want to be sitting in a train with TSP at an average speed of 10 km/h.

The TTC needs to be put under fire for its terrible operating procedures. The line could be improved tomorrow if they just drove faster and reduced unnecessarily long dwell times.

Fair enough, sort of.... but from my observation there is a very clear practice forming of coasting when the light ahead isn't favourable. If they tell the operators to speed it up, they can easily go faster and will reach the intersection sooner - but then be held just as long. It's just so obvious that the tram is not maintaining speed because the light ahead is red.
And the slow entry to platforms is the result of stopping at the red.....with TSP they can maintain full speed most of the way thru the intersection before braking. Not much point in flooring it from a stop upon getting the green, only to have to brake again. Again, it's obvious they are plodding because they are getting stopped at intersections.
Cutting a few seconds from dwell and post-stop startup will shave a couple of minutes over the length of a run, but clearing the lights might shave a dozen.

- Paul
 
Can everyone stop yapping about TSP when that isn't even the biggest issue this line faces?

People are posting, in good faith, for the most part, based on their experience and knowledge, which is informed, in part, by past experience on other TTC routes, where TSP is claimed, but the route does not operate in a manner that suggests this is true.

Is the TSP here the only factor in its speed of operation? No. Absolutely not.

Is TTC SOP playing a role here, for sure!

But I'm disinclined to dismiss the TSP issues as trivial.

If a tram is sitting at red lights frequently or for extended waits, then those doing the programing of the TSP are simply not doing their job to an appropriate or acceptable standard.

But I digress.

Also playing parts here are at least one or two more stops than would be ideal; and apparently a technically absurd design of curved track in the Humber College Portal/Tunnel that requires entirely unreasonable speed restrictions.

***

I have it on good authority, neither the Mayor's Office, nor the Premier's are pleased by the reception here and negative media coverage. How they will respond, remains to be seen.

Collectively, we need to keep the pressure on everyone here, from the TTC to Mx, from the Mayor to the Minister to make clear this performance is not acceptable and must not be allowed to continue.
 
Last edited:
People are posting, in good faith, for the most part, based on their experience and knowledge, which is informed, in part, by past experience on other TTC routes, where TSP is claimed, but the route does not operate in a manner that suggests this is true.

Is the TSP here the only factor in its speed of operation? No. Absolutely not.

Is TTC SOP playing a role here, for sure!

But I'm disinclined to dismiss the TSP issues as trivial.

If a tram is sitting at a red lights frequently or for extended waits, then those doing the programing of the TSP are simply not doing their job to an appropriate or acceptable standard.

But I digress.

Also playing parts here are at least one or two more stops that would be ideal; and apparently a technically absurd design of curved track in the Humber College Portal/Tunnel that requires entirely unreasonable speed restrictions.

***

I have it on good authority, neither the Mayor's Office, nor the Premier's are pleased by the reception here and negative media coverage. How they will respond, remains to be seen.

Collectively, we need to keep the pressure on everyone here, from the TTC to Mx, from the Mayor to the Minister to make clear this performance is not acceptable and must not be allowed to continue.
                   Apprently the city and the TTC need to come up with a transit priority policy. Really?
 
I am going to put this debate to bed about whether it's red lights or excess station dwell times that affect the final travel time more.

For reference, I timed the average dwell times for Line 6 Finch West to be 49 seconds on average for the 16 intermediate stops, from door open chime to vehicle moving again. Line 1 dwell times are around 20 seconds, which in turn are longer than Line 2. So ~30 seconds excess dwell times for each of the 16 stops. Just under 8 minutes total time wasted.

52 minute (travel time average corroborated by TTC Instructor) Finch West to Humber College trip, video not mine:
StopDwell Time (sec)Notes
Sentinel20
Tobermory50
Driftwood50
Jane and Finch85
Norfinch45
Signet65
Emery55
Milvan90
Duncanwoods35
Pearldale20Door-open buffer after vehicle fully stops is unusually 4 sec instead of 2 sec
Rowntree53
Mount Olive65
Stevenson87
Albion25
Martin Grove23
Westmore17Door open chime→door close; then 40s additional delay at red light (not a dwell)


Here is the red light time wasted, only partially accounting for time lost to deceleration. I want to emphasize this, time lost due to having to decelerate/accelerate before/after a red light is not fully accounted for. I only listed the 23 vehicle intersection traffic lights. A pedestrian crossing light is omitted due to its likely disuse. Line 6 had to slow and stop for 15 out of 23 intersections, for a total delay of at least 620 seconds or 10 minutes, 20 seconds. Average red light time ~41 sec.
10 min 20 sec is a very conservative figure, in reality, the time lost is probably closer to 12 minutes.
LocationSec#Notes
Finch West Portal201out of tunnel straight into red light lol
Sentinel02
Tobermory03
Driftwood304
Jane705
York Gate756
Norfinch07
400 East58
400 West209
Signet010
Emery011
Jayzel1012
Milvan5013
Duncanwoods2514
Pearldale2015
Milday016
Rowntree (Islington)4017
Mount Olive (Kipling)6018
Albion Mall8019
Albion7520
Martin Grove021
John Garland022
Westmore4023

When you subtract the red light (10) and excess dwell time (8) from 52 minutes, you get 34 minutes, which is more than in line with what Metrolinx originally claimed ("33 to 34" and "38" minutes). This also disproves the other claims that acceleration and cruising speed is too slow for Line 6. @Bordercollie The bigger problem is lack of strong signal priority—the current "conditional priority" might as well be "no priority"—and asinine dwell times of up to 90 seconds.

Source:

TL;DR red lights lead to 10 minutes of delays, which is more than the 8 minutes of excess dwell time. But, if both were removed, then this hypothetical 34 minute travel time would match Metrolinx's claims.

One of the many things that should piss people off about this line is that, by the way it is set up, it is more expensive to run.

They could easily cut these travel times in half by complete transit priority having the trains stop ONLY at stations and then can automatically proceed. Maintaining the 6 minute frequency, would mean that for every 1 trip made currently, they could make 2 and cut the staff by 50%. All this from the TTC and City who say they are starved for transit funding.
You are assuming the City isn't an incompetently weak negotiator at best or colluding with the TTC union at worst, maybe to protect good ol' boys' jobs. Case in point: Line 3 Scarborough RT inexplicably not being automated, as well as union push back anytime automation is discussed.
 
Last edited:
I am going to put this debate to bed about whether it's red lights or excess station dwell times that affect the final travel time more.

For reference, I timed the average dwell times for Line 6 Finch West to be 49 seconds on average for the 16 intermediate stops, from door open chime to vehicle moving again. Line 1 dwell times are around 20 seconds, which in turn are longer than Line 2. So ~30 seconds excess dwell times for each of the 16 stops. Just under 8 minutes total time wasted.

52 minute (travel time average corroborated by TTC Instructor) Finch West to Humber College trip, video not mine:
StopDwell Time (sec)Notes
Sentinel20
Tobermory50
Driftwood50
Jane and Finch85
Norfinch45
Signet65
Emery55
Milvan90
Duncanwoods35
Pearldale20Door-open buffer after vehicle fully stops is unusually 4 sec instead of 2 sec
Rowntree53
Mount Olive65
Stevenson87
Albion25
Martin Grove23
Westmore17Door open chime→door close; then 40s additional delay at red light (not a dwell)


Here is the red light time wasted, only partially accounting for time lost to deceleration. I only listed the 23 vehicle intersection traffic lights. A pedestrian crossing light is omitted due to its likely disuse. Line 6 had to slow and stop for 15 out of 23 intersections, for a total delay of at least 620 seconds or 10 minutes, 20 seconds. Average red light time ~41 sec.
LocationSec#Notes
Finch West Portal201out of tunnel straight into red light lol
Sentinel02
Tobermory03
Driftwood304
Jane705
York Gate756
Norfinch07
400 East58
400 West209
Signet010
Emery011
Jayzel1012
Milvan5013
Duncanwoods2514
Pearldale2015
Milday016
Rowntree (Islington)4017
Mount Olive (Kipling)6018
Albion Mall8019
Albion7520
Martin Grove021
John Garland022
Westmore4023

When you subtract the red light (10) and excess dwell time (8) from 52 minutes, you get 34 minutes, which is more than in line with what Metrolinx originally claimed ("33 to 34" and "38" minutes). This also disproves the other claims that acceleration and cruising speed is too slow for Line 6. The bigger problem is lack of strong signal priority—the current "conditional priority" might as well be "no priority"—and asinine dwell times of up to 90 seconds.

Source:

TL;DR red lights lead to 10 minutes of delays, which is more than the 8 minutes of excess dwell time. But, if both were removed, then this hypothetical 34 minute travel time would match Metrolinx's claims.


You are assuming the City isn't an incompetently weak negotiator at best or colluding with the TTC union at worst, maybe to protect good ol' boys' jobs. Case in point: Line 3 Scarborough RT inexplicably not being automated, as well as union push back anytime automation is discussed.
Thank you for this. Can't help but think we are circling back to the first post I made on this topic yesterday.

See the operational differences between how trams function in Europe compared to our streetcars in the below clip. It demonstrates how these delays add up visually. We may as well just replace the side-by-side clip of the TTC streetcar with the clip of the Finch West LRT in the above videos.

 
Case in point: Line 3 Scarborough RT inexplicably not being automated, as well as union push back anytime automation is discussed.
I mean, that is the point of a union. If my job were being threatened and my union didn't make every possible effort to protect its continued existence, I would be outraged. What am I paying dues for if not exactly for the union to fight my corner?
 
So some people are now claiming that during PM rush hour today, the shuttle buses along Finch were crammed. It seems quite a few people are not keen to ride the LRT. Can anyone confirm this?
 
Saw CityNews about how people are already complaining about how slow the line is. They did a test comparison on time and the shuttle buses that were running along Finch temporarily as a back up stopped at all LRT stations and several more and took 31 minutes from Humber to Finch while the LRT took for 47 minutes.
 
I mean, that is the point of a union. If my job were being threatened and my union didn't make every possible effort to protect its continued existence, I would be outraged. What am I paying dues for if not exactly for the union to fight my corner?
You glossed over more relevant discourse just to try a gotcha moment on me. Even then, you misunderstood my point entirely. I never disputed what the union's motives were or what the point of having a union was for an employee. I pointed out a potential explanation to the apparently paradoxical behaviour pointed out by @ssiguy2 "All this from the TTC and City who say they are starved for transit funding."

Their conclusion was a bit hyperbolic; I don't think a 50% cut is possible, but less staffing is entirely possible if travel times went down to 34 minutes.
One of the many things that should piss people off about this line is that, by the way it is set up, it is more expensive to run.

They could easily cut these travel times in half by complete transit priority having the trains stop ONLY at stations and then can automatically proceed. Maintaining the 6 minute frequency, would mean that for every 1 trip made currently, they could make 2 and cut the staff by 50%. All this from the TTC and City who say they are starved for transit funding.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top