unrealestate
Active Member
It makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills trying to rationalize how transit is built and run in Toronto. Years and billions spent only to have TTC neuter the line with insanely slow operations. Like WTAF are we doing?
Yes, yes, but just think of all the capacity we're gaining.It makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills trying to rationalize how transit is built and run in Toronto. Years and billions spent only to have TTC neuter the line with insanely slow operations. Like WTAF are we doing?
You are probably being sarcastic, but I think you're right. Officials now seem to be saying the line was not built for speed, but for comfort. In that case, they were probably lucky to have opening ceremonies during a snowstorm!Yes, yes, but just think of all the capacity we're gaining.![]()
![]()
Stretch your legs out and enjoy the ride. Why are you in such a rush? Take life slow. Just as Toronto transit planners intended for us.
They don't care. They'll never have to ride it. They'll fly by these trains in their luxury SUVs. They'll come and do their photoshoots and then never step foot in these trains again for years until another photoshoot/ announcement is warranted.You are probably being sarcastic, but I think you're right. Officials now seem to be saying the line was not built for speed, but for comfort. In that case, they were probably lucky to have opening ceremonies during a snowstorm!
No, they do not need to stop and wait to adjust the spacing.
Let's say they run at 30 kph in the tunnel section, and the service interval is 5 min. That means, the distance between the trains in the tunnel is 30 x 5 / 60 = 2.5 km.
Then, one of them exits the tunnel, and runs on surface at 20 kph. At that point, the next train is 2.5 km behind.
In the next 5 min, the first train covers 20 x 5 / 60 = 1.67 km. The next train (still undrground) covers 30 x 5 / 60 = 2.5 km, and reaches the tunnel exit. Thus, the distance between the trains naturally shrunk from 2.5 km to 1.67 km. Neither of the trains had to stop and wait just to make the right distance.
And after that, both trains run on surface at 20 kph, and the distance between them (1.67 km) does not change.
Why do you think those trains in the tunnel will not also be stopped at red lights for several minutes?This seems perfectly reasonable if the trains on the surface were running at a consistent speed, but they won't be. Sometimes they'll be stopped at a redlight for several minutes. Does that means all trains in the tunnel will just extend their dwell times to compensate?
I don't think you can compare a grade separated line with an "at-grade" line.Why do you think those trains in the tunnel will not also be stopped at red lights for several minutes?
Perhaps they won't all hit the exact same intersection for the same duration of time, but it makes little difference if one hits the lights at Victoria Park and another at Birchmount and another at Ionview and another at Leslie and another at Pharmacy, it all averages out, just like some subway trains encounter very heavy loads and some encounter lighter loads, depending on what has been occurring above them.
Now there's something we do agree on!What do they care? They'll never have to ride it. They'll fly by these trains in their luxury SUVs. They'll come and do their photoshoots and then never step foot in these trains again for years until another photoshoot/ announcement is warranted.
Rich & wealthy think their "time" is more valuable than everyone else's. Slow transit gets built in neighbourhoods where the inhabitants "time" isn't valued. The residents of NW Toronto have been deprived of rapid transit.
- "Here's your transit."
- It's slow
- "What do I care? I'll never have to ride it. Goodbye!"
No, it just means that some parts of the slow/surface line run slower than others. It doesn't change the principle one bit.This seems perfectly reasonable if the trains on the surface were running at a consistent speed, but they won't be. Sometimes they'll be stopped at a redlight for several minutes. Does that means all trains in the tunnel will just extend their dwell times to compensate?
I can, because grade separated lines are subject to operational irregularities, just like any other form of transportation.I don't think you can compare a grade separated line with an "at-grade" line.
Do we really need funding to fix this? Or can we just flip a switch and turn it on?
I'm no longer suggesting "bunching", but what I am suggesting is that we'll see extended dwell times at platforms. I already said this in an earlier post in the Line 5 thread.I
I can, because grade separated lines are subject to operational irregularities, just like any other form of transportation.
Look, man, I've tried to engage on this point in good faith with you. Me and quite a few others have explained why this is an overstated concern. If you don't want to believe us, that is your prerogative, but you're barking up the wrong tree here. The experience with Finch causes justifiable concern about how the 5 will be operated, but this is completely and totally focusing on the wrong thing. When you understand why bunching is not caused on the 900/927/MiWay 11/35/109 bus at the exit to the highway, despite the dramatic difference in operational speeds on the highway vs. on the city street, you'll understand the principle at play on Eglinton, too.




