Streety McCarface
Senior Member
To run the same headways as they do today all the way to Highway 7, they'd need about 11 more trains in the morning rush.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
But we're talking about frequencies better than those today.
To run the same headways as they do today all the way to Highway 7, they'd need about 11 more trains in the morning rush.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
But we're talking about frequencies better than those today.
Well there's a limit to how many vehicles you add.Well, the number of trains directly correlates with the frequency of service then, doesn't it?
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
Well, the number of trains directly correlates with the frequency of service then, doesn't it?
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
Yes, so if 11 trains are required to fill today's frequency levels, how many would be needed for trains arriving at frequencies 5/3 of those today (when CBTC is installed)? Twice as many? 1/3? Regardless, it should be about or more than 15. There's no doubt that a yard up there will help with line management, but won't it only really have a noticeable effect in the extension area? Logically, building the Sheppard west extension seems to be a better alternative to extending the Yonge line into Richmond Hill for increasing train deployments. Also, won't a significant spare ratio be required for any sort of yonge north expansion? Are these spares included in the 11 trains you cited?
I brought this up in another thread that yes the deadheading on the crosstown will be insane. However I do believe the Crosstown East will likely have its own storage facility. I know there is some land by Morningside and the 401 that could probably be used. It doesn't need to be a full blown maintenance facility only a storage yard with basic amenities.
So, what exactly are you looking for, since it sounds like you're trying to come up with some sort of fantasy scheme? Figure it out - if it requires 11 trains on a 2:21 headway, you should be able to do the math to extrapolate what the requirements on ever lower headways.
Because he promised to cancel it on more than one occasion? He's made his views clear on surface LRT on many occasions.Finch LRT is in Etobicoke, Ford territory. What makes you think he would give the finger to where he's from?
There is a significant payout by Metrolinx to cancel over 100 Flexity cars. While I don't know which project(s) this got booked for, surely Finch West is one of them. And also the payments already made to Alstom.I'm surprised they've already spent 20% of the budget, with almost no physical work yet completed.
The plan at one point would be to use the same carhouse at Conlins/Sheppard for Sheppard East, Scarborough/Malvern, and the SRT replacement, I believe. I'd assume then, that this would also be used to feed the central portion of Line 5.I brought this up in another thread that yes the deadheading on the crosstown will be insane. However I do believe the Crosstown East will likely have its own storage facility. I know there is some land by Morningside and the 401 that could probably be used. It doesn't need to be a full blown maintenance facility only a storage yard with basic amenities.
The plan at one point would be to use the same carhouse at Conlins/Sheppard for Sheppard East, Scarborough/Malvern, and the SRT replacement, I believe. I'd assume then, that this would also be used to feed the central portion of Line 5.
Though that may have been messed up, now that Metrolinx has cancelled the Flexity cars for the lines opening in 2022 and later, and are only using them for the line opening in 2021. (Why Metrolinx is unconcerned that Bombardier can get 70+ cars for Eglinton in 2021, but has freaked out about 20 more for Finch West in 2022 (or later) is beyond me ...).