interested
Senior Member
In fairness to Mr. Flaherty, the government can't set mortgage rate policy for the whole country based on 1 market; Vancouver.
The rest while worrisome is not nearly so "out of whack" as Vancouver.
Besides, Flaherty has just made 2 major mortgage rule moves in the past year. He has to see the effect. I would suggest if the effect would have been to trigger a major correction everyone would be yelling and putting blame on the Conservatives for "wrecking the housing market". Therefore, I expected his moves would be designed to cause somber second thought and not outright correction. I believe the aim all along was to slow or stall growth in prices, not cause a decline but this is a tough thing to get right.
As for Mr. Carney; his mandate is not to set mortgage rates but to control inflation. While the inflation is tepid at present (if you buy statscan's numbers) all he can do is encourage Canadians not to overextend themselves. He can't prevent them from placing themselves in precarious positions. All he can do is try and warn them, which he has been doing for over a year.
The fact that the party will keep going on for a while longer doesn't mean that most of those who are "sober" have either gone home or are in the process of sobering up before going home, and not continuing to party (i.e. buying). Again, I am talking about investment purchases for capital appreciation alone and not personal usage property.
I again emphasize that I do not have a crystal ball. I just feel the downside risk outweighs the upside potential in my view.
The rest while worrisome is not nearly so "out of whack" as Vancouver.
Besides, Flaherty has just made 2 major mortgage rule moves in the past year. He has to see the effect. I would suggest if the effect would have been to trigger a major correction everyone would be yelling and putting blame on the Conservatives for "wrecking the housing market". Therefore, I expected his moves would be designed to cause somber second thought and not outright correction. I believe the aim all along was to slow or stall growth in prices, not cause a decline but this is a tough thing to get right.
As for Mr. Carney; his mandate is not to set mortgage rates but to control inflation. While the inflation is tepid at present (if you buy statscan's numbers) all he can do is encourage Canadians not to overextend themselves. He can't prevent them from placing themselves in precarious positions. All he can do is try and warn them, which he has been doing for over a year.
The fact that the party will keep going on for a while longer doesn't mean that most of those who are "sober" have either gone home or are in the process of sobering up before going home, and not continuing to party (i.e. buying). Again, I am talking about investment purchases for capital appreciation alone and not personal usage property.
I again emphasize that I do not have a crystal ball. I just feel the downside risk outweighs the upside potential in my view.