Ahead of a meeting of the TTC board on Wednesday, the commission’s CEO Andy Byford told reporters that “given the potential uncertainty” around the mayor’s race, the agency is concentrating on preliminary work that could apply to either subway or light rail. He suggested the TTC is reluctant to spend tax dollars on a subway line that could be cancelled depending on who wins the October 27 vote.
"What we're trying to avoid is wasting money. So whether it were an LRT or a subway there's certain things that you would have to do anyway by way of preparatory work," he said. "We're proceeding with work that needs to be done regardless of the mode."
* * *
Chow's campaign was quick to jump on Byford's comments, claiming them as proof that “above-ground rail is doable."
"The studies are done, the environmental assessment is complete and construction can begin next year,” said Jamey Heath, Chow's spokesperson, in an email.
Supriya Dwivedi, a spokesperson for candidate David Soknacki, who also supports light rail, said subway proponents have been claiming the project is "a done deal, but it's clear that it's not."
Both candidates argue that the above-ground plan is the better option because it would have four more stops and serve thousands more people than the subway. They also criticize the 30-year, 1.6-per-cent tax increase that would pay for the city’s $1-billion contribution to the $3.6-billion underground line.