News   Jan 09, 2026
Last Chance to Vote in UrbanToronto’s 2025 Year-End Poll!
 460     0 
News   Jan 09, 2026
12-Storey Liberty Village Office Plan Flips to 51-Storey Rental Proposal
 2K     1 
News   Jan 09, 2026
Distillery Side-by-Side: No. 31 Rises, Goode Condos Begins Occupancy
 1.1K     0 

GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

PShells said:
Page 21

The Dundas and Logan bridges are expected to be complete by March.

At one point I was hopeful that 3rd and 4th tracks could be laid once the four bridges were completed while maintaining a safe work zone from OL construction, but I don't think these tracks can be laid until East Harbour station is completed.
Click to expand...
Any hope for just a third track in the meantime?
 
giantorangehead said:
Any hope for just a third track in the meantime?
Click to expand...

No, once all the bridgework and sound walls are in place there will be enough separation to lay both tracks at the same time.

But, as noted, the choke point is East Harbour. Wouldn't surprise me if they will build in stages - ie build the north side first, then route the two active tracks through that side, and build the south side where the active tracks currently sit. In any event there will be displacement of the tracks with a new curvature.

I'm not so sure having 3 or 4 tracks west of Danforth even matters considering there will be only 2 tracks from Danforth to Scarborough Jct once work begins on Danforth station and the Birchmount overpass. It's going to be a long process.

- Paul
 
crs1026 said:
The other vaccilation that (mis)informed this plan was the service plan for Bowmanville, which at times has on the one hand been only five or so peak direction only trains, and at other times has been presented as a full extension of LSE 2WAD with the minimum headways.

A bypass around the existing station makes a lot of sense if the peak only service is the end plan.... just interleave these trains with the Oshawa service and maybe make them express at some point towards Union.

A bypass also makes sense if you envision a 2WAD model where not all trains need to go all the way to Bowmanville, Maybe every second train terminates at Oshawa using the existing station. If headways reduce to 15 or 10 minutes, this is service as good or better than today to the "old" station and probably adequate service for downtown Oshawa and points east of there. Bowmanville-Newcastle is developing density but not to the extent of points further west.

Running the full build LSE around those tight curves and out to Bowmanville just seems like a desperate solution to fulfill all needs. And a desperate way to avoid the embarassment of having rebuilt Oshawa's depot only to move out of it.
Click to expand...
Even today, every third peak-period train starts at Whitby instead of Oshawa because Oshawa only has enough capacity to turn back 4 trains per hour.
Capture2.PNG


In a future with a branch to Bowmanville I could see 4 trains per hour travelling to Oshawa Centre (some of which continue to Bowmanville), while up to 4 additional trains per hour terminate at the existing Oshawa station.
crs1026 said:
Oh, and the whole idea was to have a transfer point to VIA....but Alto will not stop there, so that ship is sailing anyways.

- Paul
Click to expand...
Bypassing the current Oshawa station and losing the connection to Via would't necessarily be an issue because that connection could alternatively be provided at any other Lakeshore East station. I think Pickering or Ajax would be good candidates.
 
Last edited:
I personally do not see the speed restriction being such a big deal that people are making it out to be here. The train will have to slow down to enter Oshawa GO station anyways, and also accelerate out of it to leave east.

Having a slow, tight curve in the middle of a rail section with high speed is one thing, but it will add minimal difference right next to a station that already the train would have been slowing down to stop at anyways.

Not to mention the downtown Oshawa station isn't far off from after the bridge as well.

I think its fine and will be worth not creating a branch line situation like Hamilton GO/West Harbour GO
 
robmausser said:
I personally do not see the speed restriction being such a big deal that people are making it out to be here. The train will have to slow down to enter Oshawa GO station anyways, and also accelerate out of it to leave east.

Having a slow, tight curve in the middle of a rail section with high speed is one thing, but it will add minimal difference right next to a station that already the train would have been slowing down to stop at anyways.

Not to mention the downtown Oshawa station isn't far off from after the bridge as well.

I think its fine and will be worth not creating a branch line situation like Hamilton GO/West Harbour GO
Click to expand...

I can't think of another spot in the GO network where this degree of speed restriction is being accepted. Bayview-West Harbour has 25 mph restrictions, where this one may be as low as 15 mph, and for close to a mile.

The system should be designed such that Run 8 acceleration is possible from the platform onwards. This falls way short of that.

I'm sure glad you weren't on the team designing the Finch LRT - or were you? (Just kidding)

- Paul
 
robmausser said:
I personally do not see the speed restriction being such a big deal that people are making it out to be here. The train will have to slow down to enter Oshawa GO station anyways, and also accelerate out of it to leave east.

Having a slow, tight curve in the middle of a rail section with high speed is one thing, but it will add minimal difference right next to a station that already the train would have been slowing down to stop at anyways.

Not to mention the downtown Oshawa station isn't far off from after the bridge as well.

I think its fine and will be worth not creating a branch line situation like Hamilton GO/West Harbour GO
Click to expand...
Typical Ontario transit mentality.

"It's fine to sacrifice speed for better connectivity." :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

What's the point of extending the LSE GO line to Bowmanville if it'll be faster to just drive to Oshawa GO and ride it from there?
 
Last edited:
robmausser said:
I personally do not see the speed restriction being such a big deal that people are making it out to be here. The train will have to slow down to enter Oshawa GO station anyways, and also accelerate out of it to leave east.

Having a slow, tight curve in the middle of a rail section with high speed is one thing, but it will add minimal difference right next to a station that already the train would have been slowing down to stop at anyways.

Not to mention the downtown Oshawa station isn't far off from after the bridge as well.

I think its fine and will be worth not creating a branch line situation like Hamilton GO/West Harbour GO
Click to expand...
GO trains can enter platforms at nearly 100 km/h and still stop at the end (a distance of about 320 metres) and it's pretty common for them to enter going 70-80. Adding a 15 mph (24 km/h) restriction for 2300 metres is an enormous time penalty regardless of where it is relative to stations.

An electric regional train can accelerate to 75 km/h WITHIN the station:

The distance from Oshawa to Thornton Corners is about 1400 metres (which would be by far the closest spacing on the network).
Screenshot 2026-01-06 at 12.13.36.png


Here's a clip where I compare the speed of O-Train Line 2 (with a 55 km/h limit) and the REM (with a 100 km/h limit) with a stop spacing of about 1.5 km (1450m for O-Train, 1504 for REM).

The REM trains reaches 85 km/h and AVERAGES 55 km/h between those stations. The O-Train takes 49% longer, primarily due to the 25 km/h limit in stations and 50-55 km/h limits between stations.

Now just imagine how slow the O-Train would be if the 25 km/h speed limit also applied between stations! Actually you don't need to imagine, because you can easily calculate that 1500m at 25 km/h is 216 seconds. So even with infinite acceleration and deceleration, the (G)O Train would take 118% longer than the REM. And that's not the whole slow zone either - the speed restriction will continue for another 500 metres beyond the station, plus the length of the train, so about another 850 metres.
 
Last edited:
reaperexpress said:
GO trains can enter platforms at nearly 100 km/h and still stop at the end (a distance of about 320 metres) and it's pretty common for them to enter going 70-80. Adding a 15 mph (24 km/h) restriction for 2300 metres is an enormous time penalty regardless of where it is relative to stations.

An electric regional train can accelerate to 75 km/h WITHIN the station:

The distance from Oshawa to Thornton Corners is about 1400 metres (which would be by far the closest spacing on the network).
View attachment 707042

Here's a clip where I compare the speed of O-Train Line 2 (with a 55 km/h limit) and the REM (with a 100 km/h limit) with a stop spacing of about 1.5 km (1450m for O-Train, 1504 for REM).

The REM trains reaches 85 km/h and AVERAGES 55 km/h between those stations. The O-Train takes 49% longer, primarily due to the 25 km/h limit in stations and 50-55 km/h limits between stations.

Now just imagine how slow the O-Train would be if the 25 km/h speed limit also applied between stations! Actually you don't need to imagine, because you can easily calculate that 1500m at 25 km/h is 216 seconds. So even with infinite acceleration and deceleration, the (G)O Train would take 118% longer than the REM. And that's not the whole slow zone either - the speed restriction will continue for another 500 metres beyond the station, plus the length of the train, so about another 850 metres.
Click to expand...
Is it also going to have the tightest curve on the system? How does it compare to the Richmond Hill Line when it joins the LSE/ST Like at the Don River area?
 
Allandale25 said:
Is it also going to have the tightest curve on the system? How does it compare to the Richmond Hill Line when it joins the LSE/ST Like at the Don River area?
Click to expand...
Well according to OpenRailwayMap.org that curve has a 25 mph speed limit (40 km/h). Which actually seems pretty fast for such a tight curve. Are there any Richmond Hill line riders here who could check the actual speed? (Or Transee Pro subscribers)
Capture2.PNG


According to Google Earth, the radius seems to be around 165 metres.
Capture3.PNG


The curve entering Ottawa station is much larger radius
Capture.PNG


yet its speed limit is also apparently 25 mph (40 km/h).
Capture4.png


It looks like the radii on the Bowmanville alignment would be about the same as the curve at the bottom of the Don.
Capture5.PNG

OLWest2.png
 
reaperexpress said:
Well according to OpenRailwayMap.org that curve has a 25 mph speed limit (40 km/h). Which actually seems pretty fast for such a tight curve. Are there any Richmond Hill line riders here who could check the actual speed? (Or Transee Pro subscribers)
View attachment 707120

According to Google Earth, the radius seems to be around 165 metres.
View attachment 707119

The curve entering Ottawa station is much larger radius
View attachment 707124

yet its speed limit is also apparently 25 mph (40 km/h).
View attachment 707123

It looks like the radii on the Bowmanville alignment would be about the same as the curve at the bottom of the Don.
View attachment 707118
View attachment 707117
Click to expand...
Great analysis. One thing to consider on the Bowmanville Extension is that the curve is not just a curve, but a pretty significant grade change. Curve + grade is not super ideal for trains to navigate.
 
Bojaxs said:
This is the problem with the UPX approaching and leaving Pearson, is it not?
Click to expand...
Yep. I dont think that flyover counts as mainline rail, so I dont think it can qualify for the title of tightest mainline rail, but it is tighter than all the examples posted above at a whopping 130m radius by my satellite guessery
1767759608105.png
1767760257363.png


I'm a bit too young in the transit space to know the debate with UPX when it was being built, but it surprises me they didn't dig a new underpass under the hwy for a wider turn radius.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top