News   Nov 29, 2024
 329     0 
News   Nov 29, 2024
 209     0 
News   Nov 29, 2024
 529     0 

Zoning Reform Ideas

More coverage of the impending change to building codes that will no doubt spread across the country this Fall. Highlights sensible changes that address safety concerns without giving in to hystetics and anecdotes.

One aspect that I was unaware of was the two-lot requirement to develop although it sounds like that is going to be eliminated.
Does the plan included in the G&M article not include one elevator running to the top floor? This makes more sense to me, allowing for access to the more elderly, infirm, and those with injuries or disabilities to rooftop views as well. (Not to mention laws on the books about access requirements for those less abled) And perhaps striking more of a balance for smaller lots and developments to 4 or 5 stories. Above that, I think we are just accepting that we are dealing with an apartment building. And maybe we can still allow for one staircase access (with all the advancements in building materials and fire detection and suppression) , but the need for elevators will increase.
 
Here is a list of streets being considered for Major Streets zoning.


IMG_6937.png
 
Last edited:
More zoning rules changes?! Glad to see but I am lost as to what all of the changes mean as of today?!


Not exactly a zoning change.........

A new Provincial Planning Statement, and the repeal of the Growth Plan for the Golden Horsehoe.

The effect would seem to be one of allowing more urban sprawl.


The Liberals certainly don't seem impressed:

1724199518278.png

Environmental Defence doesn't seem at all pleased either:


From the above:

1724199610874.png
 
More zoning rules changes?! Glad to see but I am lost as to what all of the changes mean as of today?!

I found that article a bit vague, so I found the government press release:


OTTAWA – The Ontario government is releasing a new set of land-use planning rules that will continue to provide municipalities with the tools and flexibility they need to hit their housing targets in a way that is responsive to local challenges and reflective of local priorities. Building on the government’s Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, the new Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) will help municipalities support growth by reducing and streamlining planning rules, simplifying approvals to build homes and eliminating duplication. It also gives municipalities additional tools and flexibility that, along with the government’s historic and ongoing investments in housing-enabling infrastructure and its expansion of strong mayor powers, will help get more homes built across the province.
“In the face of high interest rates and a challenging global economy, our government is working closely with municipalities to cut red tape and give them the tools they need to build more homes and hit their housing targets,” said Paul Calandra, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. “The new Provincial Planning Statement recognizes that municipalities know best where and what types of homes are needed to address the unprecedented population growth we’ve seen. It gives them the tools and flexibility they need to get it done.”
The new PPS, which consolidates the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, streamlines land-use planning and cuts red tape by creating one province-wide land-use planning policy statement, which eliminates over 100 pages and 30,000 words of administrative burden and will save municipal staff an estimated 6,600 hours.
The PPS is a set of directions provided by the province that municipal planners, planning boards, and decision makers follow for land-use planning and development in Ontario. They use the PPS to make long-term plans for how their community will grow. This helps them, as well as the province, forecast and plan for which areas will be used for new housing, which areas will be used for industry, and which areas will be reserved for farming, parks and other greenspaces so that we will have the homes and businesses we need, while ensuring the protection of agricultural lands, cultural heritage and natural areas.
Speaking at the annual conference of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), Minister Calandra outlined key changes to the PPS, such as encouraging the building of more homes in areas close to major transit stations, including subway, GO, light rail and rapid transit bus stations. The new PPS also promotes building more homes on underused low-density lands like shopping plazas and malls.
The new PPS also encourages building a broader range of housing options, including housing for students and seniors. It supports better and more integrated planning for future growth in a way that maximizes public investment by, for example, promoting better coordination between municipalities and school boards.
The new PPS is responsive to input from three rounds of consultations over two years, including engagement with Indigenous communities and organizations, and represents provincial land-use planning interests from 21 government ministries, such as the protection of agricultural areas, aggregates, and natural heritage and the planning for infrastructure such as roads and energy supply. The new PPS will come into effect on October 20, 2024.

Quick Facts​

  • Ontario is currently experiencing unprecedented growth, with more than 500,000 new residents in 2022 and projections forecasting an additional two million by 2031.
  • Ontario is supporting standardized designs for housing, including for modular homes, and innovative construction methods, such as through upcoming changes to the Building Code to support the use of mass timber.
  • Through the first round of investments from the province’s Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund, the province is enabling the construction of more than 500,000 new homes by investing $970 million to help municipalities develop, repair, rehabilitate and expand drinking water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure. In response to the high demand for funding, the government is also allocating an additional $250 million for a second round of applications, bringing the total amount in the fund to $1.2 billion.
  • Ministers, Associate Ministers, and Parliamentary Assistants held about 700 meetings with municipalities and municipal organizations from across Ontario at the 2024 AMO conference. They discussed key priorities including housing, infrastructure, and public health, including mental health and addictions and emergency health services.
 
I have been following these developments and have the following half-baked thoughts:

•the amount of zoning change since Covid is staggering and is the most dramatic change of any jurisdiction in NA.

•though there are well-founded concerns with greenfield development the suburbs of 2024 are very different than the last century.

•zoning is one factor along with transportation and economic factors which are also very different than in the past

•there has been so much change in the last 5 years that a bit of a pause is not a bad thing!
 
•though there are well-founded concerns with greenfield development the suburbs of 2024 are very different than the last century.
It sounds like what Ford is doing is relaxing some of the density requirements that lead to the suburbs of 2024 looking the way they do. I'd hate for the suburbs of 2030 to look like the suburbs of 2000.
 
It sounds like what Ford is doing is relaxing some of the density requirements that lead to the suburbs of 2024 looking the way they do. I'd hate for the suburbs of 2030 to look like the suburbs of 2000.
The 3-4 units per lot across the province should take care of that! Lol
 
Canada has the most restrictive laws regarding point access stairwells and why that has knock-on effects in terms of unit size, livability, cost and availability.
We’re finally seeing some movement on this issue.
Paywall free: https://archive.is/C4xd0
 
More:

 
More:


There is absolutely no evidence that this results in more affordable housing in the North American context. The few approved projects thus far, such as those in Seattle are not the least bit affordable.

The modest space savings, results in greater ft2 per unit, which is the basis of a higher sales price or rent. Meanwhile, there is not only no savings in construction cost, there is actually an increase, in the typical build, because the fire rating (typically thickness of walls and floors actually goes up, creating a more expensive build per ft2.
 
I am not over concerned by this as 1)it’s BlogTO and 2)another signal that an election is coming up and everything will resume after.

 
Last edited:
I am not over concerned by this as 1)it’s BlogTO

Its Global News. (BlogTO is just relating what Global published)

2)another signal that an election is coming up and everything will resume after.

I wouldn't draw the conclusion prematurely.

 
Is it really that relevant to have "massive density" concentrated around transit stations now that city-wide zoning reforms are being implemented to bring missing-middle style density to all the major streets as of right?
 

Back
Top