T3G
Senior Member
I do not think it is only down to people being ignorant of local culture. At least, it isn't in my book. There were proposals to rename the square after Gordon Lightfoot after he died, and, given the general quality of the public space there, I would think naming the square after anyone who was not generally reviled in our local culture would be an insult.I think it's great that they're looking for a new name, but the end result is puzzling. Did all the people getting outraged participate in the process, though?
Or did a good chunk of the population just dismiss the idea of renaming places with "Dundas" in the name and spend their spare time watching foreign movies, shopping for imported goods, and consuming foreign culture in general?
Frankly, I'm just as guilty of it as others. But I know we need to do better with our place names than merely honouring early colonists who didn't accomplish that much from a cultural perspective but happened to buy up a lot of land or just happen to be the first colonists in an area.
The point is that too few people invest themselves in local culture, resulting in a vacuum effect where you can get this sort of puzzling result. Instead of saying "let's not spend money on this" more people should have thought out a better name as a matter of cultural pride and sense of ownership. The ship has sailed on not changing the name. We need to do it more responsibly, since it should only happen once in a lifetime or even more rarely.
The whole area needs to be ripped up and rethought. It is nice to have public gathering spaces, but Yonge and Dundas is one of the most distasteful intersections in our core. I'm dreading the thought of having to go there now to document Dundas station before its renaming.
Now all of that being said: I think the proposed name is apropos of nothing, and reeks of something inorganic put together by a committee, but I don't see what relevance its lack of relevance to "Canadian culture" has. We have streets and towns named after various places in Europe and Asia, which are no more relevant to Canadians than any other word or place from any other language. The real problem here is that the proposed renaming is performative and solves no real issues. Rename Dundas Square or keep it as it is; the end result is the same. No one's life has gotten better, no one has gotten worse, no one has been made richer or poorer. Why are we expending money and energy on such an empty, hollow act?
NB: I am not a fan of cultural protectionism. A well rounded individual should consume a variety of culture from a variety of different places, and that includes foreign cultures.
Last edited: