Blovertis
Active Member
A silly decision. As has been pointed out, Dundas, by the standards of his time, was one of the good guys. He was an abolitionist but knew Wilberforce's bill had no chance of passing unless softening language was inserted. He backed a compromise on the logic that half a loaf was better than no loaf at all.
That said, I don't have any problem renaming the square, but why did it have to be something that has no relevance to Canada's history? We've missed a huge opportunity to pay tribute to the Indigenous people who first occupied this land.
Yet another disappointing move from Chow.
That said, I don't have any problem renaming the square, but why did it have to be something that has no relevance to Canada's history? We've missed a huge opportunity to pay tribute to the Indigenous people who first occupied this land.
Yet another disappointing move from Chow.