News   Jul 12, 2024
 1.2K     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 1K     1 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 377     0 

Who would you like to see win the 2016 US election?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is Trump relying on Putin to deliver the general election?

IUE0aGaO_normal.jpeg
Elliott Schwartz@elliosch
12 mins ago
PATTERN: Trump praises & defends Putin
Manafort Kremlin ties
Trump aide was Gazprom exec
GOP platform now pro-Putin
Kremlin leaks DNC emails
 
Cruz, Kasich may be effectively banned from running for public office again as a new Trump revenge plot takes hold.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...acs-aimed-at-taking-down-cruz-kasich-iqybu9m1

Trump plans to create and fund super-PACs specifically aimed at ending the political careers of Ted Cruz and John Kasich should either run for office again, after both snubbed the Republican nominee during his party's convention this week, a source familiar with Trump’s thinking told Bloomberg Politics on Friday.

During an event in Cleveland on Friday, Trump hinted at the prospect of funding an outside group against Cruz in the future. “Maybe I’ll set up a super-PAC if he decides to run,” Trump said of Cruz. Turning to Mike Pence he asked rhetorically, “Are you allowed to set up a super-PAC…if you are the president, to fight someone?”

The source said that despite another former nomination rival Jeb Bush skipping the national convention and refusing to back the Republican nominee, Trump “does not care” about doing the same against Bush because the former Florida governor is already publicly “destroyed.”
 
Last edited:
Republicans Reveal an Anti-Urban, Anti-Public Transit Platform
The Grand Old Party platform calls for an end to using gas taxes for public transit as well as other non-road purposes like "bike-sharing," opposes increases to the 23-year-old gas tax, and would eliminate the U.S. DOT Livability Initiative.

See link.

Progressive Railroading reported on the American Public Transportation Association's position on the newly adopted Republican platform.

Adopted by Republicans on Monday, the GOP platform proposes to eliminate mass transit dollars from the federal Highway Trust Fund.

That proposal would "undo more than 30 years of overwhelming support for dedicated federal investment in public transit," APTA Acting President and Chief Executive Officer Richard A. White said yesterday in a prepared statement.

Referring to the Highway Trust Fund, page five of the Republican platform [PDF] states:

One fifth of its funds are spent on mass transit, an inherently local affair that serves only a small portion of the population, concentrated in six big cities. Additional funds are used for bike-share programs, sidewalks, recreational trails, landscaping, and historical renovations...These worthwhile enterprises should be funded through other sources."

We propose to phase out the federal transit program and reform provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act [NEPA] which can delay and drive up costs for transportation projects.

The Mass Transit Account dates back to legislation signed by President Ronald Reagan, the 1982 Surface Transportation Assistance Act.

For the record, it is closer to 15 percent*, not 20 percent, of fuel tax funds that are directed to the Mass Transit Account.** According to the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) "Primer on Transit Funding," December 2015 [page 22 of PDF]:

The current share of the tax on gasoline is 15.5 percent to the Mass Transit Account, 83.9 percent to the Highway Account, and 0.6 percent to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund. The current share of the tax on diesel fuel is 11.7 percent to the Mass Transit Account, 87.9 percent to the Highway Account, and 0.4 percent to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund.

The platform also speaks to what they call the Democrats' 'social engineering' orientation:

The current Administration...subordinates civil engineering to social engineering as it pursues an exclusively urban vision of dense housing and government transit. Its ill-named Livability Initiative is meant to “coerce people out of their cars.”

This is the same mentality that once led Congress to impose by fiat a single maximum speed limit for the entire nation, from Manhattan to Montana.

Like the Mass Transit Account that traces back to President Reagan, the 55 mph speed limit dates back to another Republican president, Richard Nixon, who signed the Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act. Of course, it was a different "energy era" then, with the onset of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Oil Embargo after the Arab-Israeli War that year.

Motorists have been enjoying the fruits of an oil glut since the summer of 2014, and gas prices are projected to remain low until the EIA expects global oil inventory draws to begin in the third quarter of 2017, according to the Energy Information Administration.

The lowest gas prices in 11 years would appear to be an ideal time to raise the federal gas tax, unchanged since 1993, but the Republican platform opposes increasing it. APTA is on record as supporting an increase in the tax as its "purchasing power has gone down by more than 37 percent," states White.

The Washington Post also reports on the anti-transit position of the Republican platform, noting the irony that Donald Trump "loves trains" and that "transit was key in bringing the RNC to Cleveland."

Footnotes:

*"The Mass Transit Account in the Highway Trust Fund was established in the 1982 Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 to receive part of the motor-fuel tax," according to the Federal Highway Administration.

** "Effective October 1, 1997, the deposit to the Mass Transit Account is 2.86 cents per gallon of most taxable highway motor fuels," according to the FHWA.

Hat tip to Clyde Anderson
 
Right wing propaganda? I guess you never listened to anything that left wing Bernie Sanders said. But since you are a single issue voter who only cares about race, her problems really don't matter to you anyway.

I never said anything against Bernie Sanders but Hillary won fair. Now the choice is between Trump and Hilary, the first who is a racist so the choice is clear that Trump should be banned. And yes the right wing will do whatever it takes to make up lies about the choice of minorities.
And no I don't care about race. I also fight for gay/LGBT rights, animal rights/petitioning for the banning of all meat and fish products, environment causes etc.

Racists, sure, they're on all sides of the political spectrum, GOP included. Fascists? Do you know what fascism is? Fascism is all about a central strongman and about the importance of the state over the individual. The US has one of the most decentralized governments in the world, the president has little power without the support of Congress and the Supreme Court, much to Obama's annoyance in this round. There never has been a central strongman in US politics because the system prevents it. Nor do we see fascism's abandonment of the individual over the importance of the state's needs, in fact there are few nation's where the individual has a more independent nature, as seen in the gun rights and castle laws.

To invoke Godwin, perhaps your confusing fascism with Nazism? Are you suggesting American wants to gas and otherwise murder all black people? That's a tall accusation that needs to be defended with evidence beyond the admittedly outrageous killings by cops.
There are hardly any racists in the Democratic party. Those people go to the Republicans, who are pretty much all racist. And Trump is both a Nazi and a fascist which is why he shouldn't be allowed to run for office.
 
n1h-p7TI_normal.jpeg
Jeet Heer@HeerJeet
38 mins ago
General Mike Flynn, key Trump advisor, re-tweeting openly anti-Semitic statement.

CoJATprWEAAt-3r.jpg


CoJAMruXgAkjzea.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CoJATprWEAAt-3r.jpg
    CoJATprWEAAt-3r.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 357
  • CoJAMruXgAkjzea.jpg
    CoJAMruXgAkjzea.jpg
    40.8 KB · Views: 365
Instead of posting screenshots, can someone explain how this is a scandal?

It's disappointing that someone has to explain why it's a scandal that the Democratic Party conspired to sabotage the campaign of Bernie Sanders. It was quite obvious all along but now the email leaks provide undeniable proof along with a slew of other embarrassing shit. Today the chairwoman of the DNC resigned over this. Then almost immediately Hillary welcomes her with open arms to serve as honorary chair of the campaign, and gave not so subtle praise thanking the disgraced woman who ran the party organization that rigged the election in favour of Hillary. To say that this move by Hillary was tone deaf would be an understatement. But in Clinton-world, corruption gets rewarded.
 
Last edited:
It's disappointing that someone has to explain why it's a scandal that the Democratic Party conspired to sabotage the campaign of Bernie Sanders. It was quite obvious all along but now the email leaks provide undeniable proof along with a slew of other embarrassing shit. Today the chairwoman of the DNC resigned over this. Then almost immediately Hillary welcomes her with open arms to serve as honorary chair of the campaign, and gave not so subtle praise thanking the disgraced woman who ran the party organization that rigged the election in favour of Hillary. To say that this move by Hillary was tone deaf would be an understatement. But in Clinton-world, corruption gets rewarded.

The question you really should be asking isn't that - but how the DNC got hacked, the implications of this time release and who is behind it. It's a feign within a feign - the political sleaze is just distraction from the real game. This election is becoming considerably more high stakes than it already is.

AoD
 
The question you really should be asking isn't that - but how the DNC got hacked, the implications of this time release and who is behind it. It's a feign within a feign - the political sleaze is just distraction from the real game. This election is becoming considerably more high stakes than it already is.

AoD

The US feels the need to meddle with other countries' affairs, spy on their governments and influence elections for their own interests. So honestly, I really don't care. They deserve this.
 
The US feels the need to meddle with other countries' affairs, spy on their governments and influence elections for their own interests. So honestly, I really don't care. They deserve this.

Sure, except that the US is a nuclear state and a key member of a military alliance we are part of (not to mention trading partner, etc). You don't care less or "deserve it" isn't good enough. Besides, if you dislike the US, I am sure you will find the various powers that be even more repugnant - and they certainly don't have any qualms about your values and interests.

AoD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top