Admiral Beez
Superstar
Both my parents died from addiction in their 60s, one to alcohol, the other to tobacco. But they voluntarily chose and commenced their poison and their ultimate demise, and it shouldn’t impact others' choices. I do not need harm reduction, I responsibly enjoy my alcohol and smoke the very infrequent cigar. I'm no fatalist, but none of us get out of this alive, so enjoy yourself. The only harm reduction I care about is whatever is needed so you won't harm me or others, such as jailing drunk drivers and drug dealers, but if you feel compelled to harm yourself without directly impacting others, that's on you.Increasing access to alcohol without providing proper harm reduction resources to go with it is not a good idea. Alcohol is a highly toxic, highly addictive, and highly destructive drug. You can't on one hand push down the price of booze whilst trying to tax out of existence tobacco, for example.
So, to bring up back on topic (sorry for the tangent folks) LCBO, skip the publication and put the money towards lower prices.
Last edited: