From the Star, by Hume:
What's not so sweet about new Sugar Beach
Feb 02, 2008 04:30 AM
Christopher Hume
First the good news; Toronto will have a new beach at the foot of Jarvis St.
Now the bad news; Toronto will have a beach at the foot of Jarvis St.
Everyone loves a beach, of course, but what a strange place to put one – next to a corporate head office, just across the slip from the Redpath Sugar refinery. Imagine lying in the sand under a hot sun, unable to go into the water but watching ocean-going tankers unload 50 metres away.
No doubt it will be an interesting experience, if not exactly appealing.
But such was the decision reached yesterday by a jury on behalf of the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corp, now known as Waterfront Toronto. The body chose a submission from leading Montreal landscape architect Claude Cormier, called, for obvious reasons, Sugar Beach. The scheme also includes a paved plaza punctuated by trees, and a promenade that extends through the site.
"The jury agreed the design had a confidence, a purity and a playfulness that would make Sugar Beach a favourite destination," said panel chair, architect Siamak Hariri.
Despite Hariri's enthusiasm, one can't help but wonder if this isn't the wrong place for Cormier's proposal, precisely because of its playfulness. The HtO "urban beach" farther west on the water's edge makes sense because it occupies open space and is connected to the lake. Mostly, though, it's not industrial, or even corporate. By contrast, the Jarvis St. slip is emphatically both. Indeed, Redpath represents one of the last remaining industrial uses on the waterfront.
On the other hand, perhaps that's the idea, to create some sort of hyper-urban precinct, a beach-of-the-future where bathers splash about in the oil slick and dodge cargo ships. Sounds like fun, in a grim post-apocalyptic way.
And let's not forget that this is the same spot where TEDCO (Toronto Economic Development Corp.) will build a headquarters for Corus Entertainment. The building has been much criticized by the Waterfront Design Review Panel, which last month turned it down outright. Now it seems Waterfront Toronto will allow the project to proceed despite its acknowledged lack of architectural merit.
"Not every building will be the Sydney Opera House," said Waterfront Toronto vice-president of planning and design, Chris Glaisek. "Do they think this is a great building? No, they do not." Other than TEDCO's unabashedly self-serving CEO Jeff Steiner, who called the Corus building "gorgeous," no one will disagree with Glaisek.
Which is why the prospects for waterfront revitalization don't look as good today as they should. No, not every building will be a Sydney Opera House, but does that justify a Corus?
The whole point of revitalization was to establish a new model of growth in Toronto. It was to be sustainable, intelligent, urban and elegant. The intention was to bring the city into the 21st century and provide housing for 100,000 along with parks, businesses, culture and recreation. It was meant to prove that mixed-use development could do all these things and encompass design excellence.
But with the very first project on the waterfront, that has been brought into question.
There will be opportunities to make up for the damage Corus has done, but TEDCO's development-at-any-cost mentality has no place on the waterfront. The optics couldn't be worse; people expect the first project should set a standard for what will follow. Instead, it's more of the same.
Suppose that project had been the Sydney Opera House. The waterfront's success would have been assured, and with it the city's.
As it is, Sugar Beach will have to be pretty sweet to make such a bitter pill easier to swallow.
Christopher Hume can be reached at
chume@thestar.ca
AoD