crs1026
Superstar
Reading the fine print - the IB is offering support for additional study only.
Yeah - apparently we need more study.
/s
- Paul
Yeah - apparently we need more study.
/s
- Paul
|
|
|
VIA Rail
- Thread starter ehlow
- Start date
nfitz
Superstar
I'm not sure that would paint the government in good light leading into the election.
It will be interesting to see what they are proposing between Windsor and Toronto.
DSC
Superstar
Member Bio
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 19,821
- Reaction score
- 28,727
- Location
- St Lawrence Market Area
I used to take VIA often in those days and I must say the trains very seldom met the 3.59 minute time! However, even after spending $$$ it will be sad if they cannot get (reliably) back to less than 4 hours.
cplchanb
Senior Member
On that note, what do they need to do other than the grade crossings to get the track to higher speed ready (200km/h+)?
They are right now aiming for a palsy 177km/h which in this age is actually quite slow even for HFR
They are right now aiming for a palsy 177km/h which in this age is actually quite slow even for HFR
nfitz
Superstar
Northern Light
Superstar
To hit 200km/ph + you need complete or pretty close to complete grade separation, at least on the segments where that speed is planned.
You might be able to retain grade crossings in sections where trains would be slower for other reasons.
You also really need track exclusive to the higher speed passenger service. You don't necessarily need an entire corridor, and the separation, theoretically could be temporal.
But you can't run trains clocking that kind of speed w/vastly slower trains operating on the same track at the same time.
Over 200km/ph also requires fairly straight track, and very good quality of rail infrastructure.
Finally, you need the rolling stock that can hit those running speeds.
Its potentially, many Billions of dollars expensive.
That said, if you keep the aim at 200km/ph, and only upgrade 2 or 3 extended line segments to hit the max speed for a 30km-40km stretch............there may be workable economy there somewhere.
Right now, most of us so frustrated at under-investment in the corridor, for so long, we'd be happy w/what's proposed, subject to some question's about to the level of realism of some of the preliminary estimates being subject to greater rigour.
Northern Light
Superstar
On a gross basis, buying all of CN would cost 66.5B at today's market-value.
You could certainly recover that cost in reselling, provided you didn't amputate CN's mainline.
The benefit here, would be control.
You gain control of the mainline.
You then sever the ROW in two, and dedicate 1/2 to VIA wherever that would prove useful.
You then immediately build the additional track required, and then take CN public again, but with VIA retaining exclusive track in 'The Corridor'; and probably along Bala up to NB.
Elsewhere, exclusive track would be overkill.
But you build the sidings/passing track you need, and attach 'running rights' to VIA prior to any new IPO.
robmausser
Senior Member
Considering that the difference in speed between 177kmh and 200kmh isnt much, id say this isnt worth it until we upgrade the line in the future to to HSR at 250kmh+
To spend billions to maybe shave 30 minutes off the travel time simply isnt worth it.
kEiThZ
Superstar
Looks like the CIB is funding further study. Guess that doesn’t mean that much after all.
Looks a lot like the Wynne Liberals committing to the EA for HSR right before the election. This actually makes me mad. They had years and have nothing to offer but more study? The CIB is proving to be more useless by the day. And this government really is trying hard to live up to those accusations of virtue signalling.
Looks a lot like the Wynne Liberals committing to the EA for HSR right before the election. This actually makes me mad. They had years and have nothing to offer but more study? The CIB is proving to be more useless by the day. And this government really is trying hard to live up to those accusations of virtue signalling.
Northern Light
Superstar
I was not advocating that, merely answering a question.
There maybe some small sections of track where the case could be made; but only if the rolling stock could hit 200km/ph in the first place; and if the cost were incremental (ie. the track already had to be rebuilt or relaid in section 'x', and its a comparatively cheap endeavour.
kEiThZ
Superstar
The CIB is trying hard to prove how useless it is. At this point, I really wouldn’t be upset if the Conservatives killed the outfit. Two years. All they “funded” (loaned to) was two public infrastructure projects that were already planned or underway by provincial governments. They’ve not done what they were supposed to do: bring in private and institutional capital leveraged by public capital. Funding projects that would have happened is not achieving that.
And two years they’ve been operating, they couldn’t have funded that study earlier? These guys deserve to lose their jobs.
Last edited:
rbt
Senior Member
The stated target of the expansion being revenue neutral is promising.
VIAs execution has been terrible in the past (though not necessarily their fault; railways helped). If CIB can, as an independent agency, demonstrate it's a practical plan and avoids previous pitfalls then it'll be really hard for any government to turn down.
That's certainly true.
nfitz
Superstar
Looking at the distance - the old Smith Falls to Toronto on the CP through Havelock was 338 km. Add in the 66 km from Smith Falls to Ottawa and current 187 km from Ottawa to Montreal, though from the G&M map, it looks like is shaves off about 5 km north of Coteau, presumably by running along the CP Winchester Subdivision, instead of coming down to Coteau.
The total distance from Toronto to Montreal is 586 km (compared to 539 km on the current route).
The average speed then, for the 4.75 hour journey, would be 123 km/hr. Presumably then great extents of the trip wouldn't even be at 177 km/hr.
Compare to the average 135 km/hr speed on the existing track when VIA used to run it in under 4 hours.
Hmm ... if Montreal to Toronto trains stayed alongside the CP Winchester sub instead of going all the way up to Ottawa and back, that would knock off almost 34 km to bring the route length down to 552 km - and less curves. I wonder if that's feasible in the long-run.
Certainly Ottawa to Toronto service should significantly improve. Currently from Smith Falls to Toronto is 380 km as fast as about 3.4 hours. It's only 338 km through Peterborough.
I'm still scratching my head on timings. The best Ottawa to Montreal time is about 1:50. Perhaps this drops to 1:45? Then about an 45 minutes to stop in Ottawa and get to Smith Falls? That leaves about 2:15 to get from Smith Falls to Toronto. I'm scratching my head on how it does Montreal to Toronto in much less than 5:15.
kEiThZ
Superstar
Where you getting these numbers for travel time?
nfitz
Superstar
The current ones? Via's timetable.