VIA Rail

[cplchanb]

They looked at these before and they got out bid. You would need to spend money on getting them up to VIA standard, but by cannibalizing the LRC seats at least they wouldn't need to spend money on that. They made need a mechanical overhaul. When they were in service they smoked a lot.

But once the snow inhaling probably goes away they could spare an F40 and two Budd coaches and use the baggage car as a cab car. They should have the baggage cars that were used in the corridor before COVID. Could they not use those?

dude are we that ghetto that we would have to scrounge for dinosaur relic parts just to keep our ancient fleets going...they belong in museums!

on another note, the via historical society should grab these if they have the funds to:

Ozark Mountain Railcar

Ozark Mountain Railcar || CN/VIA Rail Cafe Car #761

ozarkmountainrailcar.com

Ozark Mountain Railcar

Ozark Mountain Railcar || New York Central

ozarkmountainrailcar.com

https://ozarkmountainrailcar.com/railEquipment.php?itemId=648&category=Passenger%20Equipment

 

[Mihairokov]

ohhh... you got my hopes up for a minute....sad and ashamed that our standards are so low that 11 minutes is considered on time...

It would be viewed as acceptable, or at least equivalent, to trains in Germany, Italy, Portugal...

anywhere else overseas especially in Japan this would be unacceptable

I encourage everyone here to see the departures board from Guangzhou South Station from this past week for Chinese New Year migration, or the headway times for trains running Shanghai-Beijing.

 

[cplchanb]

It would be viewed as acceptable, or at least equivalent, to trains in Germany, Italy, Portugal...


I encourage everyone here to see the departures board from Guangzhou South Station from this past week for Chinese New Year migration, or the headway times for trains running Shanghai-Beijing.

https://chuuchuu.com/2025wrapped

more info here.

as for china i would say that is the exception not the norm. statistics have shown a consistent high 90%s on time performance. Regardless even 80% on time performance considering just how many orders of magnitude larger their network and passenger load is to ours is already worlds better.
we cant even keep 1 line on time let alone 2 dozen simultaneously.

 

[Admiral Beez]

ohhh... you got my hopes up for a minute....sad and ashamed that our standards are so low that 11 minutes is considered on time... anywhere else overseas especially in Japan this would be unacceptable

True. But we need to compare ourselves to other networks where intercity passenger rail shares the tracks with commercial freight. How do we compare on that score?