News   Nov 25, 2024
Work Advances at Line 5 Condos Near Yonge and Mount Pleasant
 600     0 
News   Nov 25, 2024
Pinnacle Resubmission Bumps Heights of Lakeside Project at Sherbourne and Lake Shore
 862     0 
News   Nov 25, 2024
Toronto’s Construction Boom: Prioritizing Worker Safety in High-Risk Environments
 422     0 

VIA Rail

dowlingm said:
By the time 2035 rolls around VIA may have 3 more Siemens sets whose three cars can handle Sarnia and the like, and freeing up 3x5 car sets for increased frequency to reduce the need for 6+ car sets…
Click to expand...
Where will the slots for more frequency come from?
 
dowlingm said:
Nine configs seems like a lot. Will be interesting to see who gets tapped to produce them, and whether they are interoperable with existing cars during ramp up.
Click to expand...
The HEP1 fleet currently consists of 9 types of car: Baggage, coach, Diner, Dome-Lounge, 3 kinds of sleeper (Chateau, Manor and Prestige) and the 2 versions of the Park-series tail end dome cars.

Considering that there is likely to be some standardization of types with the new fleet, plus the addition of the HEP2 replacements into this fleet, 9 car types sounds about right.

Dan
 
micheal_can said:
Is that the same number of cars currently in use on the non Corridor routes?
Click to expand...

I did some rough calculations years ago and came up with 33 Locomotives and 253 cars for non-corridor use.There certianly could be issues with my calculations but these order quantities seem much higher.

EDIT: I should add that I didn't include the RDCs in my calculations, but that won't have that much affect.
 
I counted 104 Renaissance cars in the „Canadian Trackside Guide 2021“ and 154 HEP I cars, but these 258 cars include the proportion of Renaissance cars which were actually allocated to the Corridor and are now retired:

Renaissance
9 BAG
14 CLUB
31 COACH
17 SERVICE
3 DINING
27 SLEEPER
3 BAG TRANSITION

HEP I
25 Coach
29 Chateau*
40 Manor
13 Diner
15 Skyline
18 Baggage
14 Park*
*includes 8 Prestige Chateau and 4 Prestige Park
 
roger1818 said:
I did some rough calculations years ago and came up with 33 Locomotives and 253 cars for non-corridor use.There certianly could be issues with my calculations but these order quantities seem much higher.

EDIT: I should add that I didn't include the RDCs in my calculations, but that won't have that much affect.
Click to expand...

Urban Sky said:
I counted 104 Renaissance cars in the „Canadian Trackside Guide 2021“ and 154 HEP I cars, but these 258 cars include the proportion of Renaissance cars which were actually allocated to the Corridor and are now retired:

Renaissance
9 BAG
14 CLUB
31 COACH
17 SERVICE
3 DINING
27 SLEEPER
3 BAG TRANSITION

HEP I
25 Coach
29 Chateau*
40 Manor
13 Diner
15 Skyline
18 Baggage
14 Park*
*includes 8 Prestige Chateau and 4 Prestige Park
Click to expand...

So, it sounds like the order is for a little more than what is currently used.. My thoughts is that is to bring back the 3rd frequency of the Canadian.
 
smallspy said:
The HEP1 fleet currently consists of 9 types of car: Baggage, coach, Diner, Dome-Lounge, 3 kinds of sleeper (Chateau, Manor and Prestige) and the 2 versions of the Park-series tail end dome cars.

Considering that there is likely to be some standardization of types with the new fleet, plus the addition of the HEP2 replacements into this fleet, 9 car types sounds about right.

Dan
Click to expand...
As a replacement for the current LD fleet maybe but I would use a sharper pencil. Each variant means smaller runs for each and a smaller pool to absorb collision or other long term maintenance absence, and being a single fleet should mean no need for transition cars (and if any are needed during ramp up, that it is the legacy cars that are adapted)

1 Baggage
2 Coach
3 Sleeper
4 Dining Car
5 Lounge with a dome, I guess.
6 Maybe an accessible Sleeper if making all Sleepers accessible gave up too much revenue space
7 Crew sleeper/bag-dorm

Even with those lesser variations these trainsets will surely dwarf what is being spent on Corridor per 85 feet of consist. Even more so if they aren’t a joint venture with Amtrak. Perhaps VIA have gotten the idea that if they propose something expensive enough, the Tories will allow them to get out of the LD business entirely and let Rocky run whatever seems profitable.
 
dowlingm said:
As a replacement for the current LD fleet maybe but I would use a sharper pencil. Each variant means smaller runs for each and a smaller pool to absorb collision or other long term maintenance absence, and being a single fleet should mean no need for transition cars (and if any are needed during ramp up, that it is the legacy cars that are adapted)

1 Baggage
2 Coach
3 Sleeper
4 Dining Car
5 Lounge with a dome, I guess.
6 Maybe an accessible Sleeper if making all Sleepers accessible gave up too much revenue space
7 Crew sleeper/bag-dorm

Even with those lesser variations these trainsets will surely dwarf what is being spent on Corridor per 85 feet of consist. Even more so if they aren’t a joint venture with Amtrak. Perhaps VIA have gotten the idea that if they propose something expensive enough, the Tories will allow them to get out of the LD business entirely and let Rocky run whatever seems profitable.
Click to expand...
That would require the government walking away from the remote communities service. I think as UrbanSky has shown us, none of them outside of the corridor are 'profitable', which is probably consistent with many other inter-city services.

Curious why they would need a crew car. I don't think it is something VIA has ever had. I understand Amtrak uses them, but I would imagine it would entail a complete re-working of collective agreements.
 
lenaitch said:
Curious why they would need a crew car. I don't think it is something VIA has ever had. I understand Amtrak uses them, but I would imagine it would entail a complete re-working of collective agreements.
Click to expand...

VIA has always had crew accommodations - by simply allocating one or more sleeper cars to crew use. And/or, by allocating a roomette to the attendant for that car (in the bad old days, sleeping car porters only had a small pull-down seat in the aisle, although many were astute enough to grab a seat in the old mens’ smoking lounge, or a vacant section, in the wee hours when no one would notice).
To my mind a dedicated space may be more suitable as there may be different space requirements for stowage of supplies, crew bags, etc.

- Paul
 
dowlingm said:
By the time 2035 rolls around VIA may have 3 more Siemens sets whose three cars can handle Sarnia and the like, and freeing up 3x5 car sets for increased frequency to reduce the need for 6+ car sets…
Click to expand...
They have already sent 5 f40's to CAD to be overhauled.
 
According to the Invitation to Tender, the current rebuild program is only supposed to extend the service life until 2035:
VIA is operating a fleet of fifty-one (51) GPA-30H locomotives, that were built by General Motors (EMD) from 1986 to 1989. The objective of this project is to further extend the expected lifetime of thirty-nine (39) GPA-30H locomotives until 2035 by restoring system performance and increasing reliability. In order to better respond to its commercial needs and operational constraints, VIA is looking to analyze the possibility of overhauling the locomotives according to a fixed and optional number of units, as explained in the ITT Scope of Work.
It is to be noted that this program is NOT related to VIA’s Long-Distance, Regional and Remote Fleet Renewal project (LDRR).
Click to expand...
IMG_6949.jpeg
 
dowlingm said:
As a replacement for the current LD fleet maybe but I would use a sharper pencil. Each variant means smaller runs for each and a smaller pool to absorb collision or other long term maintenance absence, and being a single fleet should mean no need for transition cars (and if any are needed during ramp up, that it is the legacy cars that are adapted)

1 Baggage
2 Coach
3 Sleeper
4 Dining Car
5 Lounge with a dome, I guess.
6 Maybe an accessible Sleeper if making all Sleepers accessible gave up too much revenue space
7 Crew sleeper/bag-dorm

Even with those lesser variations these trainsets will surely dwarf what is being spent on Corridor per 85 feet of consist. Even more so if they aren’t a joint venture with Amtrak. Perhaps VIA have gotten the idea that if they propose something expensive enough, the Tories will allow them to get out of the LD business entirely and let Rocky run whatever seems profitable.
Click to expand...
As pointed out by others above, there will be no dormitory car.

You're also missing out on replacements for the Prestige equipment. That service can not be discontinued, as it is the only thing propping up the rest of the service and making it even remotely close to profitable.

Bordercollie said:
They have already sent 5 f40's to CAD to be overhauled.
Click to expand...
6. There has been one at CAD for the past 6 or 8 months, acting as a prototype for the rebuild process. The 5 will be the first "production" batch.

Dan
 
smallspy said:
You're also missing out on replacements for the Prestige equipment. That service can not be discontinued, as it is the only thing propping up the rest of the service and making it even remotely close to profitable.
Click to expand...

Agreed. VIA may also want separate cars for economoy sleeping accomodations (i.e. upper and lower births) instead of having them in the same car as the cabins (like they currently are). This would make it easier to provide different services to different accomodation classes, giving more value to for money to those who upgrade and making it more affordable for those who don't.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top