News   Jul 16, 2024
 236     0 
News   Jul 16, 2024
 362     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 1.1K     3 

Urban Shocker's Neighbourhood Watch

You'll have to ask someone with better seats, lol.

I think it was pink.

Some off-topic thoughts:
- After dinner, I approached the opera house from the West, on foot, and the City Room looks stunning when it's full of people.
- Margaret Atwood caught me staring at her.
 
Otello reviews

The critques are in on Otello.

- The Star sort of liked it.

- The National Post liked it too.

- The Globe & Mail gave it a complete thrashing, a hate-a-thon.

The singing of Clifton Forbis has prompted some revisiting of the "artistic/dramatic value vs. voice-voice-voice" topic.
 
Welcome to the Neighbourhood, gristle. I share your opinion.

I changed seats after the first act because of the wheezy, snuffly, scratchy, belchy, garlic-infused slob next to me. These morons really shouldn't be let out in public. The COC sets aside a few seats for such eventualities, so I asked for one. Row 'J' was my new home for the evening, and I loved it there - close to the stage, the nuances of the acting, and the band. Frightfully nice neighbours, too.

Clifton Forbis sounded a bit wobby at first but soon settled in and was magnificent as Otello, going from strength to strength throughout the evening. It struck me as near-perfect casting - the intersection of role, voice, and career trajectory. Tiziana Caruso ( Desdemona ) also quickly found her stride, and Scott Hendricks ( Iago ) was on right from the start. Those three, I thought, were a well matched ensemble. The chorus, and the orchestra under maestro Olmi, were superb.

The sets were subdued, and gloriously colourful when the Venetian dignitaries arrived in Act III, and that made sense to me. The craggy rocks worked well enough as symbol, and well enough as a practical staging area, I thought.

Otello isn't done often, which is a shame. I think Paul Curran was smart to downplay the spectacle and stress the relationships, because there's so much going on, an epic quality to the story. The audience wasn't wildly demonstrative at the end, unlike with the more popular and often-produced operas, but some things take longer to sink in.

My pink silk hankie worked well with the black penguin suit, patents, and white dress shirt open at the collar, and drew appreciative glances from the discerning few especially during my second intermission walkabout. One must make an effort and show oneself - they expect it.

Nobody famous when I breezed through the fancy lounge, but I stood next to John Rosen in the loo. I wanted to ask him about psychopaths - Iago in particular - and whether they generally don't have an endgame ( which Iago didn't ) ... but it didn't seem the right time. Back downstairs, I chatted to a woman I know from Eglinton St. George's who informed me that they're hoping Yannick will be able to conduct for them when he's here in June for the TSO concerts.
 
I can only ditto your review. My bet is that the Globe critic sat next to a belchy garlic press, and stayed there for the whole show.

Would have loved to see the suit/hankie.
 
Not sure if I'll theme-dress for Carmen - my toreador outfit's a bit tight and I wouldn't know where to stick the banderillas. Could go as a bull, I suppose. Or just tuck a pink cocktail ciggy behind one ear and a rose behind the other.

I've renewed my subscription for next year, asking for the second row of Ring 3 - with a choice of several nights. If that's too specific my fall-back is to renew where I am. But I was so taken by my near-stage experience.

The National Ballet announces their new season in a few minutes.
 
I'm just catching up with these critiques now, having returned from a quick trip to New York (had fun!).

Thanks for these reviews, gentlemen (or, I should say gentle persons?). We'll be going to hear Otello on Tuesday the 16th.
U_S: I am glad to hear that the COC had an alternative seat for you in that situation. During Carmen, someone directly behind me was fidgeting with a piece of plastic during the first act. Fortunately, another patron stopped the offender -- a few threatening words were uttered, you had to be there!

I would have liked to see them threads, U_S. In our Tuesday night opera series, there are two or three male couples who turn themselves out very nicely (or, attractively, I should say). I wish the rest of the audience would take a cue from these guys, looking at them is akin to experiencing a slice of heaven -- they've perfected the "great jeans with sportcoat" look which is uniquely urban, and which comes off so well on the right body. In any event, do keep up the great tradition of dressing for the occasion!
 
Last edited:
...
I've renewed my subscription for next year, asking for the second row of Ring 3 - with a choice of several nights. If that's too specific my fall-back is to renew where I am. But I was so taken by my near-stage experience.
...

Second row in a balcony is a good choice for a lanky person such as yourself -- the knee room in first row of all balcony levels is a tad short (well, the exception would be on the grand box ring, I suppose). I am toward lankiness, and could perhaps move from first row of Ring 4 to the second row.

I will be at Koerner tonight. My squeeze has to work, so a favourite neighbour will be escorting me, keeping me out of trouble.
 
Last edited:
I will be at Koerner tonight. My squeeze has to work, so a favourite neighbour will be escorting me, keeping me out of trouble.

I get nervous when the words squeeze and Koerner are used that closely together.

An old art school chum's treating me to a birthday supper tonight, otherwise I might have gone too. It's not my actual birth date, just the official one - like the Queen has. Last Friday's day off work ( oops! 'work' ) for the ROM Colloquium was another such official celebration.

Let us know how Debus handles the kids. I'm tempted to see Massenet’s Cendrillon next month:

http://performance.rcmusic.ca/performance/index/year/2010/month/03/day/20/time/1930/venue/koerner
 
I was at the TSO last night to take in Fidelio's Overature and Symph. 5 last night. Both renditions were great. The 5th looks really fun to conduct.

Unfortunately we were also "treated" to a modern procussionist piece written by Simon Holt, admirably performed by Colin Currie. Here's my problem with modern art. It's not accessible without an accompanying ten page essay which deconsructs the piece. This piece probably stood for a lot in the artist's eyes, but screw him and his self-indulgence for not giving a shit about us. I could go on stage and fart 5 times, and you better clap. And I'm sure I could write an after-the-fact deconstruction of the metaphors involved.

And if any of the musicians hit a wrong note, no one will know!

EDIT:

A review from an another performance:

He wanted to avoid the reckless flamboyance of many a percussion concerto and decided that the soloist’s instruments should be few enough (glockenspiel, whistle, block, bongo, klaxon, cowbell) to fit on a table, though he also has a xylophone and sits on his cajon. The restraint pays off. One can follow the solo line, unpitched though it mostly is, more clearly than often in such pieces. In other ways, the music is unbridled, favouring the sonic extremes of piccolo and contrabassoon, and dispensing with the normative presence of violins and violas. The arresting opening is a raucous duo for the percussionist and a pair of spiky piccolos, and the 10th of the 11 brief movements is a bass-clarinet solo, one of five interludes called “ghosts”. This overlaps with movement nine, “table top”, a cadenza where the soloist chooses freely among his instruments.

The titles of the main movements all relate to Uncle Ash: the first movement is “jute”, the stuffing for the animal skins; the third “fly”, the name of his dog, “who used to fall asleep standing while staring into the fire”. Here, the soloist plays an elaborate, “spectral” xylophone part, gently backed by two orchestral xylophones, and the striking combination is used again, more equitably, in the frenetic “skennin’ Mary”, about a neigh-bour whose glass eye was wont to spin when she was angry. Uncle Ash’s supply of such appurtenances for animals provides the lurid title of “a drawer full of eyes”, a brittle scherzo. Uncles, eccentric or otherwise, make good subjects for artists, for they can be observed in close-up, like parents, but without the blur of Oedipal tensions. Holt has produced one of his most likeable and subtly coloured scores.


So maybe I just don't know enough about music? Or perhaps this piece should studied, and not actually played to the mainstream...
 
Last edited:
Maybe. Or maybe it's the shock of the new? Or spectacle without substance? Or technique without content?

Nobby Kubota once told a group of us, at art school in the '70s, that some of his performances with the Artists' Jazz Band* were so discordant he'd feel physically sick.

.......................................

* Artists' Jazz Band (AJB). A pioneering Canadian free-jazz group initially composed of Toronto visual artists associated with the abstract-expressionist movement of the late 1950s. Collectively self-taught, it was formed in 1962 in a studio over the First Floor [jazz] Club by Dennis Burton, who played saxophone, and Richard Gorman, who played bass - both were members only briefly - with Graham Coughtry (trombone), Nobuo Kubota, (saxophones), Robert Markle (tenor saxophone and piano, b 1936, d 1990), and Gordon Rayner (drums). It has included on a casual basis many other artists and musicians - including Bill Smith, Michael Snow, the bassist Jim Jones, and the guitarist Gerald McAdam - sympathetic to its adventurous style of spontaneously composed music. The AJB has generally performed in private (eg, for many years in Rayner's downtown loft) but has given occasional concerts at universities, galleries, and clubs in Ontario and was influential in the development of free jazz in Toronto during the 1970s. Some of its infrequent performances during the 1980s were made under the name An Artists' Jazz Band.

........................................

In the short video interview with Richard Gorman ( also a member of the Artists' Jazz Band ) that you can watch at the AGO's gallery 224, he talks about his painting Kiss Goodbye that's hanging nearbye. The point he makes is that if you're in a frame of mind to take a work in, if you let it talk to you in its own way, you may find something that moves you. But he also says that if it doesn't move you there's nothing wrong with you. I have a problem with Mahler, the last of the great Romantic composers ( TonyV doesn't ), but I'm certain that there's nothing wrong with me because I don't "get" it.
 

Back
Top