Railization
Active Member
When I look up the bus routes that will be replaced by Transit City on the Service Summary reports, I get worried with the possible headways. A hybrid bus seats 36 people with a crush load of 53. Compare that with just a CLRV with a crush load of 132, and a possible crush load 260 on a LFLRV, we do have to wonder what the headways will be.
I would like to make sure that the current headways will be the minimum headways of Transit City, but I would prefer to see headways that match the subway's headways.
Service planning is not based on crush loads, and it never is because service cannot be sustained at crush load, and everybody in the industry is well aware of that. They have a loading standard for regular service far below crush load to use for calculating service levels as per demand along a given route. The loading standard for the new LFLRVs has a design target of 130, half of the crush load. Sure, headways might drop to every 3.5 minutes at peak, but they're trying to schedule 1.5 minute frequencies today with the buses, which just isn't doable even in dedicated lanes, nevermind mixed traffic (the result is, of course, 6-8 minute frequencies in packs of 3 or 5). While that's over double the headway, but I hardly think that's anything to worry about. You can handle 3-4 minutes, right?