TopOfRail
New Member
Only one request from me: no fabric seat covers, please. Ew!
The TRs don't do okay on line 1 at all.What I am wondering is if they will match the excelleration profile of the T1's so that they can maintain schedule. The TR's are okay on line 1 due to the stations being more far apart but on line 2 the stations require quick acceleration and stopping to maintain schedule. If anyone remembers the H1 and H2 days they could get that done real quick.
Because it's easier to access by road. The rail link to greenwood was removed a few years ago to both expanded the rail corridor and the yardWhy are they delivering them to Wilson and not Greenwood?
Gives me similar vibes to the Tobu 70000 Series trains in Tokyo.Not sure if these images are there because I didn't log in but someone sent them to me.
View attachment 433755
View attachment 433756
7 for Scarborough, 4 for maturityJust on time, @Steve Munro is out with a story on the RFP and has highlights:
TTC Issues RFP For New Subway Trains
On October 13, 2022, the TTC issued a Request for Proposals for a new fleet of subway trains. The submission deadline is July 28, 2023, and the anticipated contract award date is December 22, 2023.…stevemunro.ca
A couple of graphics from Steve's story, for the rest, follow the link:
View attachment 433757
View attachment 433758
Lots of other interesting bits from Steve!
So the base scope is 480 cars (80 6-car trains) to replace Line 2's T1 trains for today's service.7 for Scarborough, 4 for maturity
8 for Yonge North, 8 for maturity
Can someone explain to me the math here?
Shout out to the misguided person in the Linkedin comments suggesting that the new trains should be battery powered only to save peak time energy useCross posted to TTC Other.
Not sure if this has been posted somewhere. Maybe time for a new thread?
Bem Case on LinkedIn: P76PH22075 - Request for Proposals For New Subway Trains | 18 comments
The TTC has just posted an RFP for 80 new subway trains - that’s a big order at 480 subway cars! This is a big milestone for my team, for the many who have… | 18 comments on LinkedInwww.linkedin.com
The preference is for a stainless steel body, although there is a provision within the RFP to offer aluminum provided the proponent can show that it will last the full 35 year lifespan of the cars.The only thing i'd read into the early renderings is that the TTC seems set on a stainless steel (or similar material) for the design. I havent gone through the RFP yet so I dont know if they actually spelled that out yet.
It's not 80 trains for Line 2. It's 63 trains for Line 2, and 17 trains for Line 1.80 trains for line 2 sounds like a lot. How many trains are currently running on that line?
That was supposed to be the plan with the 7th car add on. The add on will be a small car and better off going to 7 equal length. You could have one end pass the platform for a short distance since they will be only the driver on the train in the first place. In time, there will be no driver at all.And why not build them longer to take up the whole platform.
That would change the turning radius and you would need to modify tunnels.And why not build them longer to take up the whole platform.