Toronto Union Station Revitalization | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto | NORR

DavidH:

Sigh. Just made the mistake of reading some of the comments on that article. Why do I do that to myself?

Heh, I did that - and what I see didn't surprise me one bit. I wonder what private sector jobs those posters have that would actually allow them to hang out at newspaper forums all day.

Good thing UT is moderated :p

AoD
 
DavidH:
Heh, I did that - and what I see didn't surprise me one bit. I wonder what private sector jobs those posters have that would actually allow them to hang out at newspaper forums all day.
Oh, I wasn't surprised, but it was still disappointing to see that level of ignorance, particularly the peoiple who opine that it is all just a waste of money or that it is all just going to increase retail space.

Granted, the City desperately needs a proper Union station site, on line with the one GO set up for the trainshed work, to explain what the project actually will be without forcing people to read upteen staff reports.

DavidH:
I wonder what private sector jobs those posters have that would actually allow them to hang out at newspaper forums all day.
No idea. :)

DavidH:
Good thing UT is moderated :p
I think the UT readership is just a bit more informed on these issues. :)
 
DavidH:

Yeah, the city site isn't good for people who just wanted quick and dirty fast facts - personally, I wanted to see *everything* - engineering reports, etc - which are nowhere to be found of course.

I think the UT readership is just a bit more informed on these issues. :)

True, but don't bet on it - we have our share of one-trick ponies on here.

AoD
 
DavidH:

OT- Even more interesting is the individuals posting in the comments section - you should have seen the tweets by DaveMcD for example.

AoD
 
Last edited:
DavidH:
Even more interesting is the individuals posting in the comments section - you should have seen the tweets by DaveMcD for example.
His response was a classic case of running off the rails.

Of course, the articles are part of the problem. The Star focusses more on the retail than on the increased space for transit or the desperate need of a general reno of the building, so naturally, that's what people take away.
 
DavidH:

I wouldn't blame the media - citizens have to responsibility to learn about an issue however they can if they are interested in it. Ranting prior to having done so is like an invitation to be ignored (and so they are).

The amount payable to the city is still pretty pitful for a prime site like Union Station - but if I remember correctly, the original Union-Pearson plan only gives the city 500K per annum for 100 years.

AoD
 
These are separate projects but what is the status of the Front St. district plan between York & Yonge? Is restoration of the façade of the station included in the overall renovation plan?

Restoration of the façade is definitely included but the Front Street District Plan would be a different budget that isn't yet committed to. If Queens Quay, the Front St District, and John Street were done for 2015. that would be something spectacular.
 
Does this mean we're going to lose another Harvey's

harv.jpg
 
Does anyone know where VIA is going to load trains during construction of their concourse? Will they be sharing York Concourse with GO during that period?

That is likely the case at certain points during the construction. The VIA Lounge will be built in the space on the Ground Level where a bar/restaurant used to be located north of the candy business. Harvey's will be forced to close as it will become an access point from the Great Hall to the GO York Concourse providing easy access from both VIA ticketing and the VIA lounge. The York Concourse will be larger than the current GO concourse so I don't expect much space constraints.
 
Redcliff is going to lease 160,000 sq ft. of retail space for 2.5 million a year? Less than $16 per sq ft. per year. Something stinks.
 
Yep. The business which puts in only $10 million gets retail space in Union Station directly connected to the ACC and PATH for $16/sqft when downtown residential rentals are typically at minimum $20/sqft. I really wonder why the Osmington / Redcliff needed to be part of the original agreement. Considering their minimal investment it would have made more sense to finish the construction and then look after the leasing deal. If Osmington could only get the rate of $20/sqft that would mean their investment would be paid back in about 16 years. Seems like they assumed a worse case scenario and took no risks at all.
 
Although not related to the renovations, I thought this quick history of Toronto's Union Stations from Inside Toronto was interesting for those not familiar

Tracking Union Station's turbulent 151-year history

LIAM LAHEY

5bec8478469d885da6d95a213bb1.jpeg


Toronto's second Union Station as it stood in 1873 between York and Simcoe streets, a block west of the current station. Photo/DEREK BOLES

Who knew complaining about pedestrian access to the waterfront is a Toronto tradition dating back to the late 1800s?

During over 151 years of Union Station history, Torontonians demanded improved waterfront access as crossing a dozen train tracks was often a matter of life and limb.

So says Derek Boles, railway historian for the Toronto Railway Historical Association, board member at Heritage Toronto, and chair of the Union Station Revitalization Public Advisory Group. He provided an illustrated history of Union Station at a North Toronto Historical Board meeting in the Northern District Library, at 40 Orchard View Dr., on Nov. 25.

The familiar commuter train hub at 65 Front St. W. wasn't Toronto's first Union Station either. Moreover, the station we know today sat dormant and unused for the first seven years of its existence due to warring train companies and local politics - ironically, "union station" by definition is a railway station shared by two or more companies.

"The first was in service from 1858 to 1871; the second from 1873 to 1896. The third one was an extensive alteration to the 1873 station and it served until the present Union Station opened in 1927," he said. "With all these train tracks being built, access to the waterfront was a real problem for the people of Toronto...the great crossing issue remained an important priority with thousands of people streaming across the busy tracks."

On May 16, 1853, the first steam-powered passenger train left Toronto for Aurora via the Ontario-Simcoe-Huron Railway from a "wooden depot located close to the eastern entrance of today's Union Station. Over the course of the next century, the railways were to have a profound impact on the City of Toronto and its geography."

The first Union Station was shared by the Grand Trunk Railway Co., the Ontario-Simcoe-Huron Railway Co., and the Great Western Railway Co.

The second, considered to be the most opulent of its time, was opened on Dominion Day 1873. The clock that once adorned the tower of that station is still in use today at the town hall in Huntsville, Ontario.

By 1884, the Canadian Pacific Railway Co. entered Toronto. Shortly thereafter the renovations were completed in 1896 and marked what was to be the third incarnation of Union Station. It functioned until 1907 though not necessarily to satisfactory levels.

"By this time, Union Station had become totally rundown...there were up to 200 trains a day, almost as many that come into it now," he said.

And then there was the Great Toronto Fire of 1904. It cleared off all the buildings on the site for what later would become the current Union Station. Toronto Terminals Railway - group of architects - was incorporated in 1906 to build a new Union Station, but construction wouldn't actually begin for another decade.

Once built, it sat vacant for seven years because of political disagreements over where tracks running in and out of the city should be laid.

This was a huge issue in Toronto throughout the 1920s.

"You can only imagine how frustrated Torontonians must have been to have this beautiful, massive building, one of the largest and most impressive structures in the city, sitting empty for seven years while they were forced to use the old Union Station," he said.

Leap ahead to 1966 when Toronto came dangerously close to losing Union Station.

It was called inadequate for modern transportation needs and talk turned to replacing it with something more contemporary.

"New York City's mighty Pennsylvania Station was being demolished between 1963 and 1966...there was increasing pressure to do the same with Union Station," he continued. "The facility over the decades became adapted primarily for commuter traffic...the fact that Union Station was built as a through station rather than a stub-end terminal was a huge factor in its adaptation."

The most serious threat to Union Station came in 1968 when the railways decided to commercially redevelop its land.

"The railways were encouraged by a pro-development city council under Mayor William Dennison who never saw a new building he didn't like."

In 1975 Union Station was declared a national historic site, but the designation didn't afford much protection; that came in 1990 with the Heritage Railway Stations Protection Act.

If you peer up today at the Front Street entrance, you can see the names of the railways that built it, which includes the Grand Trunk Railway.

"By the time the station opened the Grand Trunk Railway was no longer in existence...none of their trains ever actually used the station."

With respect to the modern-day renovations at Union Station, Boles said he's "very much in favour of the current plans that the city and GO Transit have to revitalize the station."

For an in-depth look at Union Station's history, Boles' new book on the subject, Toronto's Railway Heritage (Arcadia Publishing), is available at Chapters-Indigo.
 
A train shed with wow factor

Angela Kryhul
Special to The Globe and Mail
Published on Tuesday, Dec. 08, 2009 12:00AM EST
Last updated on Tuesday, Dec. 08, 2009 11:06AM EST


During winter weekends in 1976, when he was a University of Toronto architecture student, Tarek El-Khatib would sometimes catch a train from Union Station to spend time with friends in Montreal. He loved train travel but loathed trudging up the dingy and heavily salted stairwells of the Toronto station to reach the damp, dimly lit platforms.

Getting on and off trains at the shed behind Union Station isn't quite the grand occasion one experiences in many European cities where platforms are protected by cathedral-like structures made of iron, steel and glass.

When its platforms were built 80 years ago, Toronto's train shed was shortchanged in the grandeur department - unlike the Beaux Arts-style Union Station building, the largest and most opulent station erected in Canada.

Behind the station, the low-ceiling, wood-and-steel train shed was designed by American engineer Abraham Lincoln Bush to serve freight operations and long-distance intercity passengers, not to impress the tens of millions of commuters who use it today.

By the end of 2014, though, Toronto will finally have a train shed with wow factor. A 5,000-square-metre glass atrium - designed under Mr. El-Khatib's guidance - will be cut into the middle of the historic train shed roof, part of a $196-million renewal plan.

"The idea is that we will ... create a sense of arrival and sense of identity for the station," says Mr. El-Khatib, a senior partner at Zeidler Partnership Architects in Toronto.

GO Transit, a division of Metrolinx, recently awarded the train shed's multimillion-dollar general contract to Aecon Group Inc., a Toronto construction and infrastructure development firm. The train shed refurbishment represents almost one-third the cost of Union Station's massive $640-million, five-year revitalization project. That overall plan includes a new 11,150-square-metre retail concourse; two new GO Transit concourses; and a tunnel connecting Union Station to Toronto's underground PATH system.

The train shed aspect is both a restoration and reinvention of the historic space. The plan calls for retrofitting the east and west sections of the 33,500-square-metre Bush roof with new galvanized steel and replacing the central section with a three-metre-deep, box-like glass ceiling that will appear to float 15.25 metres above the tracks and platforms.

The Aecon contract also includes adding nine passenger elevators and 50 new glass-enclosed stairwells to the platforms, restoring the heritage features on platform 12/13, removing and repairing 4,200 metres of existing track beds, waterproofing at track level to prevent leakage to the concourse below, installing new signalling systems and track switches, upgrading public communications equipment, and installing new roof drainage and snow melting systems.

The 65.4 million passengers who use the station every year will notice the construction, but they won't see any reduction in rail service, says Michael Wolczyk, GO Transit's director of Union Station infrastructure. The trains are already running at capacity, so the station has no choice but to get the work done without cutting service, he says.

"Even if we were able to shut down Union Station and do this work, it would still be a difficult project, but it would go much quicker," Mr. Wolczyk says. "There's a lot going on behind the scenes that people won't see. Every time we do a [train and platform] change, we have to communicate that to customers ... and there is a change to how the trains move in and out of the facility ... it's very highly orchestrated."

The biggest issue for the shed's general contractor is logistics, says Keith Williams, senior vice-president, Aecon Buildings division, Greater Toronto Area. "It's a huge challenge - material delivery, material storage, material handling. Separation of workspace from the public. And safety is absolutely paramount."

The train shed work is particularly tricky. The roof runs east-west and covers 13 tracks and 23 platforms. The plan is to close off two tracks and two platforms at a time, which means the work has to be done in narrow strips measuring about 13 metres wide by 366 metres long. Each strip will take four to seven months to complete. Work will begin at the south end and once a strip is completed, the platforms and tracks will be put back into commission. Travellers will see the space take shape.

"They will be able to look up and see sections of the roof as they are replaced and certainly, the atrium will be a key feature. Not too long in the future, there will be light coming in," Mr. Williams says.

The new north-south oriented glass atrium will be constructed in strips coinciding with the platform work below. "It's actually an engineering feat because, in most cases, the [supporting] columns land on existing footings. When they build the first strip [of the atrium], that line is actually going to anchor the whole [glass] roof," Mr. El-Khatib explains. The glass box will overhang the refurbished east and west roofs where the original industrial steel trusses will be visible. Inside the glass box will be steelwork that echoes, on a larger scale, the Bush shed steelwork.

There will be both transparent and translucent glass panels "so that there is a kind of a play between seeing the steel and sometimes just seeing the shadow of it," he says.

This idea was inspired by the large, arched windows at the east and west ends of Union Station's Great Hall. These windows also act as glass corridors connecting the station's southern and northern wings. "We thought, okay, why don't we take that [design] and lie it horizontally as an idea for the roof," Mr. El-Khatib says. At night, the lit atrium will be reminiscent of London's Tate Modern art gallery, a converted power station with a two-storey glass roof addition.

It's important to the architects, Mr. El-Khatib says, that people who use the station find the new train shed to be a fascinating space.

"We hope that [travellers] will appreciate it that way. ... We are very confident that it's going to be a really elegant piece that will do the station a lot of justice."

Green features

The green features of Union Station's train shed project:

The north end of the glass atrium will connect to a restored section of the Bush train shed roof. The underside will show original wood planking, while the exterior will house 914 photovoltaic panels that will feed 148,000 kilowatt-hours of energy per year into the public power grid.

The east and west shed roofs will be outfitted with hardy green plants.

The structure will feature high-efficiency lighting; a building automation system to control HVAC and lighting; Enwave Deep Lake Water Cooling; solar water heating for in-building use; low-water-use plumbing fixtures; a storm-water retention and grey water reuse system; and high-efficiency electrical transformers.

Ventilation of train exhaust will be non-mechanical. The original smoke ducts in the east and west Bush roofs will be restored.
 

Back
Top