Oh, leave the boy alone.
In other news, I'm surprised the ridership has only doubled. Keeps getting busier and busier.
It seems to have slightly more than doubled by now, at least from my impressions. Everytime I walk by, there seems to be more than twice as usual people for the specific hour of the day of the week. Probably is still ramping up.
It's only doubled and many of those used to take the GO train. So actual revenue across the system is down quite a bit.
Didn't they say most were airport commuters? Not sure that is "quite a bit".
If airport commuters went up, say 75% airport and 25% commuters, then it's not a huge cannibalization of revenue.
I would presume that after a few more months, it'll have been a revenue-improving overall move, since Weston/Bloor just got 15-minute GO service (via UPX), which would increase GO ridership:
-- Lower Pearson prices: Increased airport ridership
-- Higher frequency GO service at Weston/Bloor: Increased commuter ridership
So ultimately, over the next few months, I doubt the revenues would have gone down anymore. I would guesstimate we need a 2.5x factor (6000-6500 per day) for system-wide Metrolinx revenue-neutrality of the merger of UPX-GO fares -- I believe only 0.5x more increase to cancel-out the GO ridership cannibalization with the equilibrium of increased commuters caused by lower fares (new revenue).
For keeping the GO RER momentum moving forward, one concern is how quickly Metrolinx can increase ridership of UPX to comfortably fill the trains even off-peak, without frustrating people with too many standees during peak. At 5 dollars, being a standee is far less frusrrating than a nearly-$30 fare. At least Pearson/Union are termini for airport travellers, so they are very likely to get seats (since lugging baggage at maximum fare, they appreciate first crack at the musical chairs with the seats).