MD writes:
[Harmonizing the animal policy is probably a good idea...]
Well, by "Harmonize", if you mean bring GO to match UPX, great. But that's not going to happen. Let me give you an example of *contrary to all common-sense" how some personnel will dictate rules that don't exist.
I'm a distance cyclist, in amazing shape for my age (a chronic cancer survivor) and I ride a superlative classic 531 frame, rebuilt by Argos Racing in the UK. Trust me, it's an invaluable machine almost fifty years old, but still unbeatable in ride comfort today. One of my favourite joys in life is to take GO to a destination, do a hundred kilos or so (did up to 150 kms in 6.5 hrs last year), get back on the GO in another location, and come back to my starting point. Now I'm back in Toronto, there's some incredible rail-trails to the east. Have to do Uxbridge to Peterborough, GO to Uxbrige, GO from Peterborough back.
http://spacing.ca/toronto/2014/08/03/revisiting-uxbridge-peterborough-rail-trails/
I spent time in Southern California where the local transit agency requires you to use a velcro strap attached to the bike rack to secure the rear-wheel. Absolutely sensible and brilliant, especially with quick-release wheels where if some bozo loading on his junker hits the front wheel QR lever, your bike is going to come flying off, since that front wheel is all that's holding it on! There are at least two cases of this happening in the SO-CAL jurisdiction of which I speak. (Some drivers tell me it's happened to GO, but been hushed up)(one on the 401!) Plus no rider who values his/her machine would 'plonk it' on a GO bike rack (pioneered in New Mexico, btw, years before they had them here) without the peace of mind of knowing it's adequately secured. They lose it, you get nothing.
And then I started running into drivers giving me a hard time, actually getting verbally abusive and refusing to let me load my bike, all because I wanted to add three inches of double sided velcro strip to the rear wheel rim and wrapped around the rack. Long story short, I started having run-ins with supervisors, to the point that cops were called in Guelph, hands on their guns. ("The driver was scared of you"). One supervisor at Square One radioed all the drivers to tell them not to let me on the bus. I was stranded that night because of it ...Meantime, I had searched the Highway Traffic Act, and the associated "Securing a Load" provisions....and found that GO were not only in non-compliance with the Act, the supervisors counseling them to break it were committing a criminal offence, not covered under the GO Act, btw. Certain responsibilities "acting for the good of the corporation" release drivers from prosecution. Counselling a criminal act isn't, and shouldn't be. It got really nasty. Btw: The super at Square one? Asked about his reasoning: "We'd rather it go flying off on the highway than get dragged under the bus cutting brake lines." (He hasn't a clue as to how Alexander-Dennis route their hydraulics, but I digress)
National Post started asking questions (did I contact them and others? Damn right...sent them the damning evidence too) and I took my info indirectly to Del Duca through another cabinet minister who shall remain unnamed in this forum.
Two days later, I get a phone call, a *very* apologetic GM of the bus division, even after GO PR Dep't had also threatened me (I have all the emls saved) GM stating: "It was all a huge misunderstanding". He was on his day off, btw, and he was genuinely sincere and I also received a good chunk of free travel for my inconvenience. I'm told all of the supers were "severely counselled". Head of PR sent me a letter, which I carry to this day when taking my bike on the GO, instructing any staff giving me a hard time to contact her, or anyone in the top executive for a discourse on *policy*. (The supervisor at Square One actually stated: "I don't care what management says, we make the rules"). There's more, but I leave it at that, save to say many drivers who know me say" You know what, you were absolutely right on that,. Who could possibly think that fully securing your bike for the 30 seconds it takes isn't a good thing?". I still smirk at those who were looking for fisticuffs. (Three of them surrounded me at Aberfoyle when one of the drivers called them all and a supervisor to meet me when the bus pulled in there). I have their names. And it would have taken all three, but I'll leave it at that....I certainly wasn't about to cow to them.
So the lesson is this: Given the chance, X number of persons wearing uniforms and with some sort of power over you, will act like Nazis. So when I take the dog on UPX, I will have the printed regs, I will have my cell-phone, and I'll be braced for someone to try and trip me up on it. Because sure as hell, some of them look for it. That being said. most drivers who last in the system are great, I've befriended quite a few.
If tomorrow didn't look so poor weather-wise, I'd do it then, but I will try as soon as it warms up enough. The dog, who belongs to one of the partners at work, is an absolute delight, btw. All it takes is one person on the vehicle to object though, and all the regs in the world go out the window. This has happened on the Jane bus, where people from the islands go hysterical over big black dogs. It can be the best behaved dog in the world...guess who the drivers side with? I got kicked off the bus. Now who's Black?