Developer: RioCan REIT, Allied Properties REIT, Tridel, Woodbourne Canada Management, Inc.
  
Address: 410 Front St W, Toronto
Category: Residential (Townhouse, Market-Rate Rental, Condo), Commercial (Office, Retail), Public Space / Park
Status: CompleteCompletion: 2023
Height: 571 ft / 174.03 mStoreys: 46 storeys
Project Forum 7.1K posts
Real Estate Forum 24 posts
Follow 58 followingUpload 10951 photos
Official WebsiteReport Error


Developer: RioCan Living, Woodbourne Canada Management, Inc.
  
Address: 450 Front St W, Toronto
Category: Residential (Market-Rate Rental)
Status: CompleteCompletion: 2024
Height: 516 ft / 157.40 mStoreys: 46 storeys
Project Forum 7.1K posts
Real Estate Forum
Follow 2 followingUpload 0 photos
Official WebsiteReport Error


Toronto The Well | 174.03m | 46s | RioCan | Hariri Pontarini

It would be interesting to have a cat fountain, to mirror the dog fountain at Berczy park. These places are at roughly the same longitude.
They're even closer to being at the same latitude!

42
 
I'm not a fan of the site plan and that weird diagonal curved street thing in the middle or the "a humongous podium followed by a humongous podium" concept but I do hope this project properly animates Wellington.
 
I'm not a fan of the site plan and that weird diagonal curved street thing in the middle or the "a humongous podium followed by a humongous podium" concept but I do hope this project properly animates Wellington.

Don't get your hopes up. Just look how great the Eaton Centre has been for lower Yonge Street :rolleyes:

The new landscaping on Wellington will be A+ though.
 
SPA drawing sets have been posted for the highrise and midrise portions of the project.

On a related note, the thread title doesn't currently account for architecture consultants Adamson, aA, Wallman, and BDP.
 
Last edited:
upload_2017-10-27_17-52-28.png


upload_2017-10-27_17-53-35.png


upload_2017-10-27_17-55-5.png


upload_2017-10-27_17-55-28.png


upload_2017-10-27_17-57-31.png


getting some serious Liberty Village vibes from the Wallman buildings (and not in a good way).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-10-27_17-52-28.png
    upload_2017-10-27_17-52-28.png
    562.1 KB · Views: 618
  • upload_2017-10-27_17-53-35.png
    upload_2017-10-27_17-53-35.png
    969 KB · Views: 641
  • upload_2017-10-27_17-55-5.png
    upload_2017-10-27_17-55-5.png
    507.3 KB · Views: 590
  • upload_2017-10-27_17-55-28.png
    upload_2017-10-27_17-55-28.png
    222.2 KB · Views: 594
  • upload_2017-10-27_17-57-31.png
    upload_2017-10-27_17-57-31.png
    527.6 KB · Views: 626
Those Wallman ones are old. The bricks are like this. GFRC for the solid areas in the setbacks.

20171027_180813.png
 
SPA drawing sets have been posted for the highrise and midrise portions of the project.

On a related note, the thread title doesn't currently account for architecture consultants Adamson, aA, Wallman, and BDP.

There may be a character limit for thread titles haha :D
 
To be honest, those tower designs are pretty underwhelming. I think it works for the middle building with the heritage-esque podium, since it echoes the dynamic of buildings like QRC. But overall I was hoping for something with more variety. I guess its better to have memorable podiums (podia?) and generic towers than the other way around though.
 

Back
Top