ratoronto
New Member
Love the podium (hopefully this will liven up this corner a little bit), already bored with the tower...
There may be at least a few who feel the high point of "Yamasaki Modern" was this:
What, it sure has no historical value and see nothing special in trying to restore this... Its butt ugly, Yuk
Of course, what I *really* have in mind is "Yamasaki Gothic" a la One Woodward (or, for that matter, the metal-rather-than-concrete WTC)--which is only "Brutalist" to those who'd rather obtusely-contemptuously bundle *everything* 60s/70s-concrete under that brand of convenience.
That's precisely the 'thinking of the day' towards every era of architecture that's been discarded. People tore down buildings like the Temple Building because they said it had no historical value, it was nothing special, and it was butt ugly. Most 1960s-1980s architecture won't fully be appreciated for another 40-50 years and our grand kids will look at us and ask why we had to tear 90% of it down because it wasn't fashionable at the time.
Do you really think people tore down all those old buildings because people back then valued them? No, they tore them down because they didn't like them. In 40 years when Toronto has hardly none of these 70s buildings left the same chorus of 'what were they thinking' will arise. Then the pattern will repeat.
40 years from now people will be calling our current building style ugly and of no historical importance. They'll call for their re-development because its 'ugly'. People never learn from history or past mistakes.
Gee, it must be boring around here when you have to dig up a post from 6 months ago to prove a lame definition (Temple Bldg. vs the Global House Bldg.)
Hey, if they hadnt demolished some of those old buildings in the core, we wouldnt have had much of a CBD...unfortunately same has happened to many other world citys, and have lost a lot of history to become what they are,
.. Come-on, 40 years from now people including our grandsons will understand just like we've had to understand the price you pay for progress.
Bottom line is, you can't have your cake and eat it too,...i still say, no love-loss on this building
So many spelling errors, syntax errors, and mangled phrases! My brain hurts!
So many spelling errors, syntax errors, and mangled phrases! My brain hurts!
That's precisely the 'thinking of the day' towards every era of architecture that's been discarded. People tore down buildings like the Temple Building because they said it had no historical value, it was nothing special, and it was butt ugly. Most 1960s-1980s architecture won't fully be appreciated for another 40-50 years and our grand kids will look at us and ask why we had to tear 90% of it down because it wasn't fashionable at the time.
Do you really think people tore down all those old buildings because people back then valued them? No, they tore them down because they didn't like them. In 40 years when Toronto has hardly none of these 70s buildings left the same chorus of 'what were they thinking' will arise. Then the pattern will repeat.
40 years from now people will be calling our current building style ugly and of no historical importance. They'll call for their re-development because its 'ugly'. People never learn from history or past mistakes.