Ramako
Moderator
So was this the big reveal? The secret aA design that was supposedly going to be vastly superior to the massing study boxes?
Agreed. That said, it does leave the argument of unspecified density being a necessity for economic viability for various projects around the city in a bit of a bind - if a project can survive a downsizing of this magnitude and remain economically worthwhile to pursue, then what is the justification for the significantly higher densities originally requested?
AoD
This is far too sterile and corporate looking for Yonge St--looks more suited for the CBD or upper Bay. The intention of any new developments on Yonge should be to add to the street vitality, not suck it away like this soulless monster.
So was this the big reveal? The secret aA design that was supposedly going to be vastly superior to the massing study boxes?
Unfortunately this is only the first foray into the north part of downtown Yonge with several others yet to come. As for this project surviving a downsizing and still being profitable, remember that this will have above ground parking which is considerably less expensive than 4 or 5 levels of below ground parking. It's still going to be a really tricky (and time consuming) site building over the subway line.
what you are trying to communicate, DT....your last two sentences are contradictory. the above grade parking makes it more profitable....but the construction over the subway makes it less profitable...
This is far too sterile and corporate looking for Yonge St--looks more suited for the CBD or upper Bay. The intention of any new developments on Yonge should be to add to the street vitality, not suck it away like this soulless monster.